The media gave Dan Quayle hell over the spelling of potato. The media gave Palin hell over stumbling over the question about what news papers she read. G. W. Bush got hell for not pronouncing nuclear correctly (and for many other things). Why hasn't the MSN given Obama hell for not understanding math?
Even though I'm still new here and hence, aren't yet familiar with you, I've little to no doubt that you well know the answer that question, man.
Remember when Nancy Pelosi told Bill O'Reilly that he was "disrespectful" to the president during their
mano-y-mano Super Bowl interview?
Awwwwww, wasn't that just so cute?
Now, let's open up our memory banks and reflect back just a bit further.
Remember all the times Ms. Pelosi and her crew of fellow blue Washington jackwads were "disrespectful" (her word, not mine) to President George W. Bush? Too many times to count, unless we're both writing our doctoral dissertations right now, huh?
The last person in the world who should have the right to call anyone else "disrespectful"—toward the president, toward pretty much just everyone in the entirety of the world in general—is a Democrat.
That's the thing with liberals: they think their stuff don't stink. They like to think they know what's best for all of us, and they say so in the most condescending manners imaginable.
And we both know that most of the (I would've used the term
mainstream right here just a few years ago; but nope, not anymore) American media are Obama's driving wheel.
Our favorite dundering, doltish Obama dittoheads on tv are never going to ask him that question, or any other pointed "disrespectful" question designed to get to the bottom of any given Obama Administration fiasco.
May as well get used to it: that's just the way it is. And it ain't gonna change.
But glass half-full: given the routine mistakes President Obama makes, it should be fairly obvious to most of us now that he isn't the antichrist.
