Project 2025

I heard a little bit about this from the biased left-wing media. They obviously are biased and a disgrace to the country. With their bias coverage of the BLM riots compared to January 6, for example

Anyway, I briefly looked at project 2025 The project 2025 is not at all racist from what I’ve seen. They actually want to eliminate racism including anti-white racism. They want to criminalize pornography. They want to Make abortion illegal.

There are some things I might disagree with like taking some of the funding away from Medicaid and Medicare.

Also Christian values would play more of a role in the government which is something that’s not controversial. It’s always played a part in our countries history and we are a Christian majority country. Realize that many of the charitable groups in the world are Christian based.

The lying and bad politics from Democrats is hopefully going to end. I bet some of them never even read what project 2025 is about. Apparently, Mr. Trump does not endorse project 2025 but maybe he should. Democrats make Project 2025 out as if it is something from the devil and it’s once again something they blatantly lie about. Please just educate yourself on the project itself,


TrumpProject2025 redirects to the DNC

This is a bunch of BS typed up for some democrat fever dream

Trump's platform is Agenda47.com


 
Why should anyone keep their personal thoughts to themselves in a society that cherishes free speech?
Talk all you want.

Don’t make laws based on your beliefs
 
That's What I said Moron......then why push the "Christian" on us?
No one pushed anything on YOU, (what is this us garbage? Have you got a crab in your pocket?) Are you trying to say that the predominant religion in the US is not Christianity? Hmm, maybe this is why our schools are failing.
 
Just because most of us are Christians, does not make us a Christian nation. If one day Muslims out number us do you want us to be a Muslim nation? Then stop what you are doing.

There are many of us who are not Christians. So this is not a Christian nation. We are secular nation. Or should be. I know the radical Republican judges are going to try to make us a Christian Nation.

Christian values? Like slavery and murdering indians?

Why is one state trying to put the 10 commandments in every classroom? Sounds like somehting the Heritage Foundation would be behind. Sorry, I don't want to see those 10 rules, that Trump gets to break and you still vote for him.

I don't believe in magical thinking
If and when the population of the USA is predominantly Muslim, we will then be a predominantly Muslim country just as are the 50 predominantly Muslim countries now existing in the world. The fact that not every person in most of those countries are Muslim does not change that.

One state is trying to require the 10 Commandments (which are Jewish by the way) in classrooms because the elected leaders of that state want the 10 Commandments in the classrooms. That is no different than the elected leaders of a state wanting no posting of the 10 Commandments in the classrooms. In my opinion, both positions are wrong and unconstitutional but neither have anything to do with the demographics of a country being predominately of white European heritage and predominantly Christian.
 
We are a majority Christian nation
Which means absolutely nothing since very few modern, American, Christians choose to be "Christ-like" in the least.
"Christian" is just a useless name tag they clip to their shirt pockets.
It doesn't really stand for anything.
 
2025 reminds you of Glorious Five Year Plan, Comrade?


Blow off clown. Clinton years rode it to less destruction than normally done by Commee criminal DemWitted loons.

The Contract with America was a legislative agenda advocated by the Republican Party during the 1994 congressional election campaign. Written by Newt Gingrich and Dick Armey, and in part using text from former President Ronald Reagan's 1985 State of the Union Address, the Contract detailed the actions
 
What needs 'condemned' exactly?


Hard for any of them to say. It is 30 chapters and nearly 1000 pages. It is not a bunch of bullet points. For example, This is a small snippet of DEPARTMENT OF
THE TREASURY (I thought maybe I could find some concrete spending plan or debt reduction).
******************


THE “EQUITY” AGENDA
Under the Biden Administration, the Treasury Department has appointed a
Counselor for Racial Equity, established an Advisory Committee on Racial Equity,
and created an o"ce for Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility. All these
should be eliminated. Treasury has created several new o"ces to promote “equity”
and has made this its first of five strategic goals in its Fiscal Year 2022–2226
Strategic Plan. “Equity” is identified as a cross-cutting theme in 15 of 19 of the
plan’s objectives.
The avowed purpose of these initiatives is to implement policies that deliberately favor some races or ethnicities over others. The casual acceptance and
rapid spread of racist policymaking in the federal government must be forcefully
opposed and reversed. The next conservative Administration should take a"rmative steps to expose and eradicate the practice of critical race theory and diversity,
equity, and inclusion (DEI) throughout the Treasury Department.
These steps will include:
l Identify every Treasury o"cial who participated in DEI initiatives and
interview him or her for the purpose of determining the scope and nature of
these initiatives and to ensure that such initiatives are completely ended.
l Make public immediately all communications relating to the work of the
Treasury’s critical race theory and DEI initiatives.
l Treat the participation in any critical race theory or DEI initiative,
without objecting on constitutional or moral grounds, as per se grounds for
termination of employment.
l Expose and make public all training materials and initiatives designed to
single out any race, ethnicity, or sex for special treatment.
The Administration should eliminate the 25-member Treasury Advisory Committee on Racial Equity.
CLIMATE-RELATED FINANCIAL RISK
Treasury has created a new departmental o"ce, “Climate Hub,” and has made
“combating climate change” one of the Biden Treasury Department’s top five
— 709 —
2025 Presidential Transition Project
principal goals. The next Administration should eliminate the Climate Hub O"ce
and withdraw from climate change agreements that are inimical to the prosperity
of the United States.
The Climate Hub o"ce “coordinates Treasury’s work to inform, guide, incentivize, and mobilize financial flows for climate mitigation and climate adaptation
and supports the broader alignment of the financial system with a path to netzero emissions by mid-century.“71 According to the Biden Administration’s Fiscal
Year 2022–2026 Strategic Plan for Treasury, the fourth of five Treasury strategic
goals reads:
Combat Climate Change
The United States and the world face a climate crisis and a narrowing
window of action to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. At the same
time, the transition to a low carbon economy represents a historic economic
opportunity for the U.S. and global economy. The U.S. federal government
must work alongside our domestic and international partners to respond
ambitiously to tackle the challenges of climate change, adapt to an already
changing climate, mitigate the risks, and position the global economy for
clean and sustainable growth.72
Yet history shows that economic growth and technological/scientific advance
through human ingenuity are by far the best ways to prevent and mitigate extreme
weather events. Moreover, virtually all of the initiatives that the Biden Administration has adopted would, even if successful, have a de minimis impact on changing
global weather patterns, in part because most nations—notably China—are not
cooperating with climate summits and international agreements. Virtually all
nations, for example, that signed the Paris Agreement73 have not met their treaty
obligations. Such routinely violated treaties weaken the U.S. economy with no o!-
setting societal benefits. To that end, the next conservative Administration should
withdraw the U.S. from the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change74 and
the Paris Agreement.
The next Administration should use Treasury’s tools and authority to promote
investment in domestic energy, including oil and gas. It should reverse support for
international public- (and private-) based e!orts promoting Environmental, Social,
and Governance75 and Principles for Responsible Investment,76 both of which have
badly damaged U.S. energy security.
OTHER REFORMS
U.S. Coast Guard and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and
Explosives. Congress should examine whether to return the Treasury’s former
— 710 —
Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise
in-house law enforcement capabilities via the return of the United States Coast
Guard and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. Bringing
these agencies back from the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice, respectively, would allow Treasury, in the case of U.S. Coast Guard,
to increase border security via a vigilance with respect to economic crimes (for
example, drug smuggling and tax evasion).
U.S. Trade and Development Agency. Congress should eliminate the U.S.
Trade and Development Agency (USTDA). The USTDA is intended to help companies create U.S. jobs through the export of U.S. goods and services for priority
development projects in emerging economies. The USTDA links U.S. businesses
to export opportunities by funding project planning activities, pilot projects, and
reverse-trade missions while creating sustainable infrastructure and economic
growth in partner countries.
These activities more properly belong to the private sector. The best way to
promote trade and development is to reduce tari! and non-tari! trade barriers.
Another way is to reduce the federal budget deficit, and thereby federal borrowing
from abroad, freeing more foreign dollars to be spent on U.S. exports instead of
federal treasury bonds.
Other Issues. Many Treasury Department issues cut across multiple parts of
Treasury or other governmental agencies. Several are discussed in this chapter,
but not all can be covered here in depth. Other issues of concern include China,
cybersecurity, digital assets, digital services taxes, international debt defaults, Iran,
Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds and private sector pensions, sanctions
policy, and treasury auction and debt issuance
 
Actually, I made an A in science.
Man Made Climate Change is a weak hypothesis.
It is not a proven fact.
The way you refute science is to present your own BETTER science.
So where is your "better" science to support your ridiculous claims here?
 
Touched a nerve I see. Are you one of those fake "Christians" yourself?
Please link to where I claimed to be a Christian, moron. You know what assuming does. BTW, stating the fact that Christianity is the predominant religion of the nation does not necessarily make one a Christian--just someone who tells the truth. You should try it sometime.
 
It does make us a predominantly Christian nation founded by predominantly Christians on predominantly Christian values.

Let do the same thing but in WHITE:

"It does make us a predominantly WHITE nation founded by predominantly WHITES on predominantly WHITE values."



Lets see you sqeeze out a difference in argumenation between racial and religious bigotry.
 
Last edited:
Blow off clown. Clinton years rode it to less destruction than normally done by Commee criminal DemWitted loons.

The Contract with America was a legislative agenda advocated by the Republican Party during the 1994 congressional election campaign. Written by Newt Gingrich and Dick Armey, and in part using text from former President Ronald Reagan's 1985 State of the Union Address, the Contract detailed the actions

Right. Very little of it ever got implemented and Clinton was able to call it "The Contract ON America" as a punchline.

Meanwhile, Newt was forced to resign in disgrace. Armey got indicted and removed from his position.
 
Okay, guy, that time you made a paper mache volcano in fifth grade doesn't count.

Man-made Climate change is an accepted fact in the scientific community.
No it's not.
There many scientists who disagree with the man made global warming myth.
 
Back
Top Bottom