Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
Are you equating an abortion to a funeral.......in that a person has died.
Interesting!
someone always dies in a abortion.
Not the case, it is a relatively safe procedure.
Not for the victim.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you equating an abortion to a funeral.......in that a person has died.
Interesting!
someone always dies in a abortion.
Not the case, it is a relatively safe procedure.
People are seriously arguing about this? Who fucking cares?
Ah yes, the moroinc ghoul straw man. Does a cancer growth have an independent heartbeat and brain waves, Herr Mengele?
You still don't get it.
A infant is living independent of it's biological mother regardless if it is being breastfed or not.
Woman die in childbirth and the infant still survives because it is now biologically independent. It isn't a difficult concept.
Sometimes a post just writes its own rebuttal.
Pretty funny too. "Somewhere along the line" huh...![]()
okay, I have watched your tape and yes, there are a few people singing, Hail Satan in the back ground....
BUT on the chanting tape that this op began with was NOT CHANTING of hail Satan, period.
While the Christians are singing Amazing Grace, the other group is chanting,
not the church, not the State, women must, decide our fate.
The uploader of the video posted the 2 parts in the wrong order.
The video you watched actually comes first chronologically. The crowd around them keeps chanting Hail Satan, the Pro-Lifers then start singing Amazing Grace to drown them out. The Pro-Satan crowd then encircles them and SHOUTS "HAIL SATAN."
It ends when they're done singing amazing grace, the Pro-Satan crowd stops and the girl sticks her tongue out and jeers "Hail Satan" one last time.
Funny that you should say that. There have been examples of tumors that contain teeth, hair and yep, even beating hearts. Fetiform Teratoma (Homunculus)
As you know, in 1968 the shameful democratic party was taken over by the Bolshevik wing of radicals. The disaster that was Hubert Humphrey allowed the Bolsheviks, led by George McGovern, to wrest control of the party away from the remaining Jacksonian democrats. Somewhere along the line, the party decided to co-opt the term used for Teddy Roosevelt's old Bull Moose party, and glommed on to "progressive," though it is highly inappropriate.
democrats are a little dog on a leash held by the greater Bolshevik movement.
Sometimes a post just writes its own rebuttal.
Pretty funny too. "Somewhere along the line" huh...![]()
I first heard "progressive" popping up in the 90's. It seemed pretty absurd that those seeking to recreate 1917 claim to be "progressive."![]()
You tell me -- YOU are the one who morphed the latter into the former. Try reading your own words above.
My words were very clear, apparently you have difficulties with the English language. Perhaps this is your only defense however, obfuscate to the point where the people trying to deal with your bullshit just give up and move on. I understand that you can't address my question in either an open or honest way, because you're wrong, and you know you're wrong.Anyone finding it worth their time can link back thru the posts to see who 'morphed' what, and it most definitely wasn't me. But then, you already know that, obfuscation is you're only 'weapon'. Unfortunately it doesn't work with me.
![]()
Once again, you wiped out the evidence and then claim it isn't there.
Fortunately it's on the record, to wit:
Ahem...
... the only person stupid enough to try to make the argument that communism and atheism don't typically go together. Well, you and Pogo, now there's a relationshp!
I mirrored exactly what you typed, yet you have to morph it into something else because you're not equipped to deal with the original.
Dishonest hackery.
--- and I'm the one who can't read English...
![]()
Funny that you should say that. There have been examples of tumors that contain teeth, hair and yep, even beating hearts. Fetiform Teratoma (Homunculus)
Herr Mengele, please post an example of a tumor that has measurable heart and brain activity - as EVERY last one of your prey do?
Oh, and your own article states {The majority are composed of disorganized, neoplastic, mature tissues of 1 or more of the embryonic germ layers: ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm.} - meaning that it is a failed zygote. AND I note NOTHING in there about hearts, beating or otherwise.
As I said, you offer ghoul bullshit, nothing more.
Funny that you should say that. There have been examples of tumors that contain teeth, hair and yep, even beating hearts. Fetiform Teratoma (Homunculus)
Herr Mengele, please post an example of a tumor that has measurable heart and brain activity - as EVERY last one of your prey do?
Oh, and your own article states {The majority are composed of disorganized, neoplastic, mature tissues of 1 or more of the embryonic germ layers: ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm.} - meaning that it is a failed zygote. AND I note NOTHING in there about hearts, beating or otherwise.
As I said, you offer ghoul bullshit, nothing more.
This is a pro-life lie.
You still don't get it.
I get it just fine, you are a ghoul with bloodlust for the most defenseless in society.
A infant is living independent of it's biological mother regardless if it is being breastfed or not.
Ghuouls are not well versed in biology or human physiology. One of the more amusing of the ghoul myths is that of the magic vagina. That it is the vagina which confers "personhood." Somehow in the damaged brains of ghouls, there is this idea that a baby is a "blob" that instantly transforms into a "person" by passing through the vagina. I guess ghouls don't manage to consider caesarian delivery, but then, we are not talking the best and brightest here.
Ghouls have no grasp of gestation, they don't have the intellect to understand the development of the child as a gradual progression. Ghouls seem to be little more than rabid hyenas, frenzied by the prospect of killing their prey.
Woman die in childbirth and the infant still survives because it is now biologically independent. It isn't a difficult concept.
Women die independant of child birth and premature babies survive.
What you ghouls preach is voodoo, in direct contradiction to medical fact.
Herr Mengele, please post an example of a tumor that has measurable heart and brain activity - as EVERY last one of your prey do?
Oh, and your own article states {The majority are composed of disorganized, neoplastic, mature tissues of 1 or more of the embryonic germ layers: ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm.} - meaning that it is a failed zygote. AND I note NOTHING in there about hearts, beating or otherwise.
As I said, you offer ghoul bullshit, nothing more.
This is a pro-life lie.
ROFL
So, you attempted to post bullshit that you didn't grasp, and the best you can do is scream "pro-life lie?"
What a fucking moron.
Ghouls are some stupid motherfuckers. Did you finish grade school? Serious question.
Your right, the vagina has nothing to do with person-hood. It is the lack of reliance on a womb for survival that determines person-hood.
Burden of proof rest on those making a claim. Show me peer reviewed evidence of organized brain activity in a fetus.
"Hey honey! Look, I just called this guy on the internet a ghoul! That'll show him!"
Ghouls are some stupid motherfuckers. Did you finish grade school? Serious question.
Let's get back to what you're running from, which is how you lied about a zygote having brain activity.
Serious question, are you just a complete dumbshit, or it just another example of your "The ends always justify the means for my cult!" deviant lifestyle?
I just ask because I don't think even you can be stupid enough to equate "has some brain tissue" with "brain activity." You can feed yourself, so you can't actually be that dumb. Therefore, you must be faking your stupid routine, right?
Or maybe not. Just let us know. Are you a dumbshit or a liar? Mind you, I'm not precluding the possibility that both categories apply.
Burden of proof rest on those making a claim. Show me peer reviewed evidence of organized brain activity in a fetus.
You posted a link to a journal that does not confirm your claim, and in fact refutes it. While the presence of a failed zygote presenting as a cyst will by definition contain cells that have markers to organs, your claim of "beating heart" was an absurd lie, a fabrication on your part.
So again I ask you, did you complete grade school?