Creating the unperson. Another overblown attempt by the Left to practice Soviet-style techniques to expunge the less-than 21st Century orthodox from the public square, and history.
It's interesting that they're going after a minor Democrat god this time. What did they do to piss the ignorant little dears off?
Wilson was a racist asshole, that's known history. He was so despised by the end of his second term that Warren Harding barely had to campaign at all and still won the biggest landslide to that date.
But he was a wheel at Princeton, that's historical fact. You can't rewrite history -- that's what internet message boards are for.
Whatever their visual depiction is, they could always add some frank commentary. Or simply limit it to his time there and ignore the POTUS years.
He was also a Democrat, whose attitudes rather undermine the story of post-Civil War epiphanies among them.
Not sure what that's supposed to mean but it's irrelevant. "Democrat" and "Republican" are not static terms. They're political parties. The parties of 1915 bear little to no relationship ideologically to those of 2015. The parties of 1865, even less so. Political parties exist for one purpose, and that is to organize and consolidate power. They don't exist to represent a fixed ideology.
Interesting
Pogo
Because of the confusion over who to blame for which corruption
it is hard to tell what the parties stand for when the lines blur.
However, given the more established political platforms and agenda passed through govt today,
it is CLEAR that the Democratic Party does believe in using govt to push political beliefs in
* health care through govt as a right and obligation instead of enforcing free choice and free market
* marriage for gay and equal recognition of transgender, even though both are "faith based" and
have no place in govt imposition if you believe in "separation of church and state" as Democrats claim
This idea of contradicting the Democrats' OWN principles of
* free choice and freedom from govt intrusion on private decisions
* separation of church and state, and NOT imposing beliefs through govt
are clearly a political agenda or belief system,
that it is REQUIRED to do these things and that is why it is okay for govt to impose beliefs in these cases
Clearly a spelled out agenda of BELIEFS as found published in the Democratic Party's own
platform. These are BELIEFS, and establishing BELIEFS through govt is another BELIEF
(which the Republican party does not share, unless of course, it's THEIR beliefs in
right to life or right to bear arms which are inalienable and cannot be abridged or denied by govt
without due process of law to prove someone committed a crime before depriving them of rights)
)
