usmbguest5318
Gold Member
I'm no "raving idiot" and I too can tell Singer's essay and thesis , though not incoherent or strange, is nonetheless weak. Among people who are inclined to reject anything having to do with nations, most especially their own country, earnestly undertaking productive and proactive initiatives to abate the anthropomorphic causes of global warming, few are likely to be swayed, if not at all, even incrementally, by Singer's argument. His argument may be coincidentally interesting, even somewhat instructive with regard to "how muches" and "by whoms," to people already convinced about the need to abate AGW's progression and impacts; however, even to keen and critical thinkers in that class, the essay cannot be seen as compelling as a catalyst for acting on that need.Lol,
Is this thread a joke or what? The princeton professor is somehow wrong to a raving idiot that doesn't have a clue about basic climate. lol