- Banned
- #1
The Supreme Court has decided that the redistricting in Texas is legal and now Jasmine Crockett is officially gone from congress.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Supreme Court has decided that the redistricting in Texas is legal and now Jasmine Crockett is officially gone from congress.
The Supreme Court has decided that the redistricting in Texas is legal and now Jasmine Crockett is officially gone from congress.
She wants to run for the senate
And I’m sure she will run her mouth constantly till thenShe is legally entitled to continue until jan 2027. Why do you post such stupid bullshit all the time? Do you have any shame at all?
Article 1 section 2 of the COTUS states
- Clause 2 Qualifications
- No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.
UnfortunatelyAnd I’m sure she will run her mouth constantly till then
All gerrymandering in both Democratic and Republican states seems to fly in the face of, the citizens picking their leaders that govern through a free and fair election, vs the govt leaders in power carving out convoluted districts made up of the citizens they chose... who they know, will vote for them.
We could use the census and AI to draw districts simply on the basis of population densityAll gerrymandering in both Democratic and Republican states seems to fly in the face of, the citizens picking their leaders that govern through a free and fair election, vs the govt leaders in power carving out convoluted districts made up of the citizens they chose... who they know, will vote for them.
We could use the census and AI to draw districts simply on the basis of population density
And repubs would be the big winners
Sure, "legally" she is allowed to hang out at Congress. Nobody there will be mean to her, just because she is the lamest of lame ducks. They will listen politely to her rantings and phony ghetto patois, just as they have for the last three years.She is legally entitled to continue until jan 2027. Why do you post such stupid bullshit all the time? Do you have any shame at all?
Article 1 section 2 of the COTUS states
- Clause 2 Qualifications
- No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.
Yes, good point. I was just about to suggest some AI type solution, or some algorythm to take human bias out of it. But you are right, human bias is baked in the cake of everything humans do, so let's fight it out publicly, not be handed a spreadsheet created by HAL.Someone would find a way to skew it.
If there is to be gerrymandering, better it to be out in the open where all can see, AND better for it to be equally done by both sides.
All gerrymandering in both Democratic and Republican states seems to fly in the face of, the citizens picking their leaders that govern through a free and fair election, vs the govt leaders in power carving out convoluted districts made up of the citizens they chose... who they know, will vote for them.
And I’m sure she will run her mouth constantly till then
If her district doesn't exist anymore.....she's gone. The legislature voted for this. FYI, this is how Democracy works.She is legally entitled to continue until jan 2027. Why do you post such stupid bullshit all the time? Do you have any shame at all?
Article 1 section 2 of the COTUS states
- Clause 2 Qualifications
- No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.
But you're saying that once voters in one single election vote in a representative or legislator, then that representative or his Party, gets to gerrymander their own seat where they safely win each year after, where it is no longer the voter picking our representative every 2 years? That certainly could not have been our Founder's intention....???The citizens pick the State leaders that do the gerrymandering.
The only real solution would be to increase the size of the House to 2k or 3k reps making it that much harder to gerrymander simply due to the time and thinking that would be involved.
But you're saying that once voters in one single election vote in a representative or legislator, then that representative or his Party, gets to gerrymander their own seat where they safely win each year after, where it is no longer the voter picking our representative every 2 years? That certainly could not have been our Founder's intention....???