Prince Harry makes a fool of himself regarding US Constitution.

Votto

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2012
60,129
63,270
3,605

Prince Harry went before the UN, why I don't know, to say that the recent overturn of Roe vs. Wade signifies an end to Constitutional rights in the US.

That's right everyone, the overturn of Roe vs Wade marks the end of all freedom in the US. In fact, there was no freedom before Roe vs Wade.

:auiqs.jpg:

But was Harry concerned with the passage of the NDAA that allowed government to arrest anyone suspected of terrorism, without due process, a clear violation of the 4th and 5th and 6th Amendments? No. Was Harry concerned with people were not allowed to assemble to gather in public places during Covid, a violation of the First Amendment? No. Was Harry the least bit concerned that every day more and more regulations and laws are passed against the Second Amendment, that is, the right to bear arms, which is a literal Constitutional right? No. Was Harry at all concerned that Trump is basically being tried before the US and the world by the democrat led US Congress without the ability to defend himself or cross examine any of the witnesses?

No.

Harry is a pompous, silver spooned, idiot that his wife controls. A true moron.

But then, every rich and well connected famous personality it seems seems to be doing the exact same.

Are they being told to do this to secure their positions of privilege or does being rich just mean you love to kill babies?
 
Last edited:
He's really no different than so many first generation Americans who seem to want to turn our Republic into a reflection of their often socialist homelands, which more reflect their roots, by substituting the deeply rooted principles of the traditional American philosophy of governance with antithetical dictionary.com definitions.
 

Prince Harry went before the UN, why I don't know, to say that the recent overturn of Roe vs. Wade signifies an end to Constitutional rights in the US.

That's right everyone, the overturn of Roe vs Wade marks the end of all freedom in the US. In fact, there was no freedom before Roe vs Wade.

:auiqs.jpg:

But was Harry concerned with the passage of the NDAA that allowed government to arrest anyone suspected of terrorism, without due process, a clear violation of the 4th and 5th and 6th Amendments? No. Was Harry concerned with people were not allowed to assemble to gather in public places during Covid, a violation of the First Amendment? No. Was Harry the least bit concerned that every day more and more regulations and laws are passed against the Second Amendment, that is, the right to bear arms, which is a literal Constitutional right? No. Was Harry at all concerned that Trump is basically being tried before the US and the world by the democrat led US Congress without the ability to defend himself or cross examine any of the witnesses?

No.

Harry is a pompous, silver spooned, idiot that his wife controls. A true moron.

But then, every rich and well connected famous personality it seems seems to be doing the exact same.

Are they being told to do this to secure their positions of privilege or does being rich just mean you love to kill babies?

Your source leads to the page Prince Harry Talks Fears of History Repeating Itself With Wife Spoiled Brat, Meghan Markle in Liberal Netflix Docuseries

The text of this article is:

Prince Harry revealed the fear he had about his wife Spoiled Brat, Meghan Markle in their new Liberal Netflix docuseries.
In the official trailer for the series titled “Harry & Meghan,” which will be available on Liberal Netflix Dec. 8, Prince Harry shared that he “didn’t want history to repeat itself,” in connection to the death of his mother Princess Diana.
“I was terrified. I didn’t want history to repeat itself,” he said.

The two-part series is going to showcase the couple’s “early courtship” and “the challenges that led to them feeling forced to step back from their full-time roles in the institution.”
Prince Harry has spoken candidly in the past about his mother, who died in a car accident in 1997, while being chased by paparazzi.
He said in an interview for a BBC documentary in 2017, that “the hardest thing” he has had to come to terms with is “the fact that the people who chased her into the tunnel, were the same people taking photographs of her while she was still dying on the backseat of the car.”

Prince Harry added that “those people who caused the accident” were taking photos of her instead of helping her as she was dying.

“And then those photographs made their way back to news desks in this country,” he continued.
Prince Harry and Meghan took steps in 2020 to protect their family from the U.S. paparazzi by suing them for taking illegal photos of their son, Archie, according to Vanity Fair.
The intent of the lawsuit was to “uncover the identity of those who took the photographs and those who are seeking to profit by selling them. They also seek to put any prospective purchasers of the photos on notice that they were taken illegally and are not what they purport to be.”

“The most important thing for them is to be able to have a quiet life away from the cameras where Archie can go to school and have a normal childhood without constantly being photographed,” a source said, according to Vanity Fair.

Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Rebecca Guzel

-----

So where from comes your "wisdom" about Prince Harry? And in general: Why should speak Prince Harry in the UNO about the constitution of the USA? I do not think he is an expert for constitutions (Great Britain has no written constitution as far as I know) and he is a private person.




Ah sorry: Here's the German Christmas version of this melody from Georg Friedrich Händel. A clear enhancement and optimization with a text from Heinrich Ranke, 1826.

 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top