Presidential Rankings........Obama: Tenth......Trump: last

[rightwinger]

Looks like Trump has nowhere to go but up

Opinion | How Does Trump Stack Up Against the Best — and Worst — Presidents?

Since our previous survey in 2014, some presidential legacies have soared (Barack Obama’s stock has climbed into the Top 10), while others have fallen (Andrew Jackson toppled to 15, out of the Top 10).

And President Trump? Let’s say that, according to the 170 members of the American Political Science Association’s Presidents and Executive Politics section who filled out our survey, he has at least three years to improve on an ignominious debut.

The NYT? Go away.

What is wrong with the survey of 170 historians?

Historians from liberal progressive hateful academia? No.

When broken out by party of the historians

Trump still ranked only 40 among Republicans

Again far to soon to evaluate Trump's presidency. I guess it gives you more complete bullshit to talk about.

Other presidents on the list are ranked on just 30 days ( W H HArrison) and six months (Garfield) .....Trump has had a year

But he could always do better ( he can't drop any lower)

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

take a bow trumplings

When they looked at their data along party lines, things improved for Trump—a little. While he was dead last among Democratic scholars, he was ranked 43rd by independents, with Buchanan hanging onto last place. Among Republican political scientists, Trump came in at a more forgiving 40th place.

Trump Was Named the Worst President Ever in a Survey of Political Scientists

Academentia

We don't bow to Rainbow Bow-wows.

 

[JGalt]

The NYT? Go away.

What is wrong with the survey of 170 historians?

Historians from liberal progressive hateful academia? No.

When broken out by party of the historians

Trump still ranked only 40 among Republicans

Get over it. The book's closed on Obama. As inconsequential as they come and getting more so every day. The HopeyChangey thing never panned out.

The book is closed on Obama

Looks like he did pretty good

He did pretty good at two things:

1. Artificially inflating the stock market, thereby making a lot of Wall Streeters wealthy.

2. Boosting the sale and manufacture of firearms and ammunition.

 

[rightwinger]

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ It''s the Slimes, dumb ass

Seems the New York Times has Reagan as nine and Eisenhower as seven

Are they biased there too?

Too early to judge Trump or Obama, anyone with any sense will tell you that.

Andrew Jackson is still being judged after 200 years. His ranking has dropped

You judge on what you know when the poll was made

 

[Meathead]

The NYT? Go away.

What is wrong with the survey of 170 historians?

Historians from liberal progressive hateful academia? No.

When broken out by party of the historians

Trump still ranked only 40 among Republicans

Get over it. The book's closed on Obama. As inconsequential as they come and getting more so every day. The HopeyChangey thing never panned out.

The book is closed on Obama

Looks like he did pretty good

No, he didn't, and no one witht an iota of legitimacy can claim he was anything beyond marginal.

 

[rightwinger]

What is wrong with the survey of 170 historians?

Historians from liberal progressive hateful academia? No.

When broken out by party of the historians

Trump still ranked only 40 among Republicans

Get over it. The book's closed on Obama. As inconsequential as they come and getting more so every day. The HopeyChangey thing never panned out.

The book is closed on Obama

Looks like he did pretty good

No, he didn't, and no one witht an iota of legitimacy can claim he was anything beyond marginal.

You and FoxNews are not historians

Even Republican historians have Obama at 16

 

[JGalt]

The way I see it, if Trump is ranked low by opinionated leftist bloviators who write hack pieces for the NYT, then good for him. If Trump is hated by the unhinged radical left, then it's obvious that he's doing a wonderful job.

Keep it up, you Magnificent Orange SOB. I'm not tired of winning yet.

 

[Lastamender]

Historians from liberal progressive hateful academia? No.

When broken out by party of the historians

Trump still ranked only 40 among Republicans

Get over it. The book's closed on Obama. As inconsequential as they come and getting more so every day. The HopeyChangey thing never panned out.

The book is closed on Obama

Looks like he did pretty good

No, he didn't, and no one witht an iota of legitimacy can claim he was anything beyond marginal.

You and FoxNews are not historians

And you and NYT are?

 

[Meathead]

Historians from liberal progressive hateful academia? No.

When broken out by party of the historians

Trump still ranked only 40 among Republicans

Get over it. The book's closed on Obama. As inconsequential as they come and getting more so every day. The HopeyChangey thing never panned out.

The book is closed on Obama

Looks like he did pretty good

No, he didn't, and no one witht an iota of legitimacy can claim he was anything beyond marginal.

You and FoxNews are not historians

I admire you tenacity, but Obama was an inconsequential president.The fat lady has sung on this. It's over.

 

[MarathonMike]

Wow you mean someone found a bunch of political scientists who hate Trump more than any other President?
What a shocker!

 

[Ricky LIbtardo]

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ It''s the Slimes, dumb ass

Seems the New York Times has Reagan as nine and Eisenhower as seven

Are they biased there too?

Yeah Reagan is top five at least

Reagan brought down the Berlin wall and Trump brought down the Blue wall.

Looks to me like Trump is running in fourth place right behind Washington, Lincoln, and Reagan.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Looks like Trump has nowhere to go but up

Opinion | How Does Trump Stack Up Against the Best — and Worst — Presidents?

Since our previous survey in 2014, some presidential legacies have soared (Barack Obama’s stock has climbed into the Top 10), while others have fallen (Andrew Jackson toppled to 15, out of the Top 10).

And President Trump? Let’s say that, according to the 170 members of the American Political Science Association’s Presidents and Executive Politics section who filled out our survey, he has at least three years to improve on an ignominious debut.

/----/ Obozo was in office 4 years in the first survey. Trump has been in office a little over a year. But nice try Spanky.

 

[Auld Phart]

Wow you mean someone found a bunch of political scientists who hate Trump more than any other President?
What a shocker!

and after only 12 months in office.

By the time his term is up, they may rank him below Jefferson Davis

 

[Meathead]

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ It''s the Slimes, dumb ass

Seems the New York Times has Reagan as nine and Eisenhower as seven

Are they biased there too?

Yeah Reagan is top five at least

Reagan brought down the Berlin wall and Trump brought down the Blue wall.

Looks to me like Trump is running in fourth place right behind Washington, Lincoln, and Reagan.

Trump brought down the Blue Wall and he's going to putup the Mexican Wall. All Obama did was put up a Red Lline which Putin and Assad are still laughing about.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

These presidential ratings are always worthless because they are done by prejudice left wingers

 

[DarkFury]

Looks like Trump has nowhere to go but up

Opinion | How Does Trump Stack Up Against the Best — and Worst — Presidents?

Since our previous survey in 2014, some presidential legacies have soared (Barack Obama’s stock has climbed into the Top 10), while others have fallen (Andrew Jackson toppled to 15, out of the Top 10).

And President Trump? Let’s say that, according to the 170 members of the American Political Science Association’s Presidents and Executive Politics section who filled out our survey, he has at least three years to improve on an ignominious debut.

The NYT? Go away.

What is wrong with the survey of 170 historians?

A LEGIT historian would not rank a president until AFTER he has served idiot!

 

[Eaglewings]

Looks like Trump has nowhere to go but up

Opinion | How Does Trump Stack Up Against the Best — and Worst — Presidents?

Since our previous survey in 2014, some presidential legacies have soared (Barack Obama’s stock has climbed into the Top 10), while others have fallen (Andrew Jackson toppled to 15, out of the Top 10).

And President Trump? Let’s say that, according to the 170 members of the American Political Science Association’s Presidents and Executive Politics section who filled out our survey, he has at least three years to improve on an ignominious debut.

Wow Kennedy is below LB Johnson

 

[playtime]

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ It''s the Slimes, dumb ass

Seems the New York Times has Reagan as nine and Eisenhower as seven

Are they biased there too?

Yeah Reagan is top five at least

reagan banned assault rifles & drastically reduced nukes. he's a god damn liberal by rw whackjob's standards.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Yaaawn, all the socialists dislike Trump, so do the easily triggered alt-left in Hollywood.

Let's see how it shakes up if he gets two terms. So many anti-American sob's who will undermine the nation for their own benefit.

 

[Coyote]

It doesn't surprise me...but it also isn't meaningful since he's only been in office one year and you can't truly evaluate a president until he is well out of office.