Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thank you captain obvious. He is Also not legally required not to wear an ape suit and climb on his desk during interviews.Which Trump is not legally required to do.
So true. So why is Washington threatening to remove Trump from their state ballot for not doing something he isn't required to do?Thank you captain obvious. He is Also not legally required not to wear an ape suit and climb on his desk during interviews.
Criticizing Trump is one thing and that's all proper and expected. Deleting the president's name from the Washington state ballot is the issue.But we can still criticize him for it. Well, in my country we can. Not sure how it works for you in mother russia.
Because, as it turns out, legislators can make new laws. Maybe next week we can cover what "voting" is. Then, we can watch a cute little cartoon about a bill. Then you willbe up to speed with a 4th grader.So why is Washington threatening to remove Trump from their state ballot for not doing something he isn't required to do?
They sure can however not every new law is in compliance with other laws that supersede it. I don't know if anyone ever told you about this.Because, as it turns out, legislators can make new laws.
Ironic that the dunce tries to show up the guy who happens to know what he's talking about. Such smug presumption is a sign of an interesting condition.Maybe next week we can cover what "voting" is. Then, we can watch a cute little cartoon about a bill. Then you willbe up to speed with a 4th grader.
Neato! But you forgot to enlighten us all on what relevance that has on this topic.They sure can however not every new law is in compliance with other laws that supersede it. I don't know if anyone ever told you about this.
Because, as it turns out, legislators can make new laws. Maybe next week we can cover what "voting" is. Then, we can watch a cute little cartoon about a bill. Then you willbe up to speed with a 4th grader.So why is Washington threatening to remove Trump from their state ballot for not doing something he isn't required to do?
Another vapid post by francis the slayer of the english language....Because, as it turns out, legislators can make new laws. Maybe next week we can cover what "voting" is. Then, we can watch a cute little cartoon about a bill. Then you willbe up to speed with a 4th grader.So why is Washington threatening to remove Trump from their state ballot for not doing something he isn't required to do?
Study Civics, Dummy. You and AOC should have been left back in grade school
I think I stated the issue very clearly right up front in post #53. I even said "I think if you look at this issue you'll find this is the pertinent point".Neato! But you forgot to enlighten us all on what relevance that has on this topic.
Be specific.
Haha, whatever, you fraud. You mentioned only two things:I think I stated the issue very clearly right up front in post #53. I even said "I think if you look at this issue you'll find this is the pertinent point".Neato! But you forgot to enlighten us all on what relevance that has on this topic.
Be specific.
It's not a clue or a hidden message. I'm telling you in plain unambiguous words where the relevance is.
Is there an literate adult around who can help you out?
Another vapid post by francis the slayer of the english language....Because, as it turns out, legislators can make new laws. Maybe next week we can cover what "voting" is. Then, we can watch a cute little cartoon about a bill. Then you willbe up to speed with a 4th grader.So why is Washington threatening to remove Trump from their state ballot for not doing something he isn't required to do?
Study Civics, Dummy. You and AOC should have been left back in grade school
Have the majority of US presidents done the same?Did Abe Lincoln make all of his personal tax documents public?Trump to be left off 2020 ballots unless he shows his tax returns, Washington State says
Donald Trump’s name will not appear on voting ballots in Washington State if the president fails to release his tax returns ahead of the 2020 elections.
Lawmakers in the Washington State senate approved major legislation this week that would legally require all presidential candidates to release the last five years of their personal tax returns in order to have their names featured on both primary and general voting ballots.
Surely they have finished that audit by now ?
I wonder if this is a wise move ? Doesnt it create a precedent ? Trump is a bad apple but this type of tactic could be used to exclude decent people.
Honest people don't have a thing to worry about. If it excludes dishonest people, it's a breath of fresh air and would stop MOST of the Presidential Wanna be's cold in their tracks. Imagine, an Honest Abe President. It's been a very long time. I believe the last one was Ike.
Yes, he made all his Federal Tax returns available on request.
Article 2 of the US constitution clearly states the requirements to be eligible for the US presidency.Sorry but the requirements to run for president is not one of those things the 10th coversTrump to be left off 2020 ballots unless he shows his tax returns, Washington State says
Donald Trump’s name will not appear on voting ballots in Washington State if the president fails to release his tax returns ahead of the 2020 elections.
Lawmakers in the Washington State senate approved major legislation this week that would legally require all presidential candidates to release the last five years of their personal tax returns in order to have their names featured on both primary and general voting ballots.
Surely they have finished that audit by now ?
I wonder if this is a wise move ? Doesnt it create a precedent ? Trump is a bad apple but this type of tactic could be used to exclude decent people.
And it will be found to be unconstitutional as there is no constitutional requirement to publicly disclose tax returns
LOL
So there is a Constitutional requirement that one must make tax records public?
Nope. There is however a 10th Amendment.
But one can meet those requirements and still not be eligble to be on a state's presidential ballot. So how is that relevant in the least?Article 2 of the US constitution clearly states the requirements to be eligible for the US presidency.
Washington's new law assumes legal license it does not possess. I can't make it any clearer.Haha, whatever, you fraud. You mentioned only two things:
"Gee, why are they making a law?"
And something about superseding law. And now I am putting the spotlight on you so that you can tell the class precisely which superseding law to which you are referring, or so that you can cobble something, anything together resembling a coherent thought on the topic you, yourself, breached. Now, run along and furiously google for something to prop up your vapid bloviating. Good luck!
I doubt that SCOTUS is going to buy that flimsy excuse to usurp the presidency.But one can meet those requirements and still not be eligble to be on a state's presidential ballot. So how is that relevant in the least?Article 2 of the US constitution clearly states the requirements to be eligible for the US presidency.
On what grounds?Trump to be left off 2020 ballots unless he shows his tax returns, Washington State says
Donald Trump’s name will not appear on voting ballots in Washington State if the president fails to release his tax returns ahead of the 2020 elections.
Lawmakers in the Washington State senate approved major legislation this week that would legally require all presidential candidates to release the last five years of their personal tax returns in order to have their names featured on both primary and general voting ballots.
Surely they have finished that audit by now ?
I wonder if this is a wise move ? Doesnt it create a precedent ? Trump is a bad apple but this type of tactic could be used to exclude decent people.
And it will be found to be unconstitutional as there is no constitutional requirement to publicly disclose tax returns
On what grounds?Trump to be left off 2020 ballots unless he shows his tax returns, Washington State says
Donald Trump’s name will not appear on voting ballots in Washington State if the president fails to release his tax returns ahead of the 2020 elections.
Lawmakers in the Washington State senate approved major legislation this week that would legally require all presidential candidates to release the last five years of their personal tax returns in order to have their names featured on both primary and general voting ballots.
Surely they have finished that audit by now ?
I wonder if this is a wise move ? Doesnt it create a precedent ? Trump is a bad apple but this type of tactic could be used to exclude decent people.
And it will be found to be unconstitutional as there is no constitutional requirement to publicly disclose tax returns
The states conduct elections, not the Federal government.
