President Barack Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize

This is such a slap in the face to Bush and republicans.

I don't know about Bush and Republicans but those of us who claim no party think it is ******* hysterical.

First time in my life that I've actually seen someone win an award for doing nothing. No wonder the latte liberals are happy - you guys make a doing nothing a way of life.

Most liberals thought this was premature as did a lot of the press. Myself included.

If you check my post, I refer to the 'latte liberals' (ie those in the 'elite' - DC, Hollywood, etc) not libertards (the great unwashed, unemployed and unemployable that make up the base).
 
I don't know about Bush and Republicans but those of us who claim no party think it is ******* hysterical.

First time in my life that I've actually seen someone win an award for doing nothing. No wonder the latte liberals are happy - you guys make a doing nothing a way of life.

Most liberals thought this was premature as did a lot of the press. Myself included.

If you check my post, I refer to the 'latte liberals' (ie those in the 'elite' - DC, Hollywood, etc) not libertards (the great unwashed, unemployed and unemployable that make up the base).

Libtards = liberals

Libertards = libertarians
 
This is such a slap in the face to Bush and republicans.

I don't know about Bush and Republicans but those of us who claim no party think it is ******* hysterical.

First time in my life that I've actually seen someone win an award for doing nothing. No wonder the latte liberals are happy - you guys make a doing nothing a way of life.

Most liberals thought this was premature as did a lot of the press. Myself included.

On the second thought, was it really premature or they knew exactly what they were doing?

Europe in Obama recognized the guy who is willing to play by their rules, in other words, he's weak enough to bend over and suck it up to them. Twelve days in the office was enough time for them to realize that two-faced Obama is their guy.

Whoever see what the world is really like with a guy like Obama in the white house, will also understand why Bush was the way he was.
 
Whoever see what the world is really like with a guy like Obama in the white house, will also understand why Bush was the way he was.

It is interesting how prior to January 20, it was all about change. Now, we can't go one week without people defending Obama and the Democrats by saying, "well, Republicans/Bush did it too!"

Funny how the more things change, the more they actually stay the same.
 
I don't know about Bush and Republicans but those of us who claim no party think it is ******* hysterical.

First time in my life that I've actually seen someone win an award for doing nothing. No wonder the latte liberals are happy - you guys make a doing nothing a way of life.

Most liberals thought this was premature as did a lot of the press. Myself included.

If you check my post, I refer to the 'latte liberals' (ie those in the 'elite' - DC, Hollywood, etc) not libertards (the great unwashed, unemployed and unemployable that make up the base).


Ah yes, those great unwashed, unemployed and unemployable libertards. Blue collar liberals like myself. Of course, I did have one minor job last year, but I only managed to crack very low six figure earned income, so it is just as if I did not work at all, correct?

Cali, you, and the rest here, are a so damned stupid with your stereotypes.
 
Ame®icano;1599864 said:
I don't know about Bush and Republicans but those of us who claim no party think it is ******* hysterical.

First time in my life that I've actually seen someone win an award for doing nothing. No wonder the latte liberals are happy - you guys make a doing nothing a way of life.

Most liberals thought this was premature as did a lot of the press. Myself included.

On the second thought, was it really premature or they knew exactly what they were doing?

Europe in Obama recognized the guy who is willing to play by their rules, in other words, he's weak enough to bend over and suck it up to them. Twelve days in the office was enough time for them to realize that two-faced Obama is their guy.

Whoever see what the world is really like with a guy like Obama in the white house, will also understand why Bush was the way he was.

I dont know why people think he was nominated after he took office, He was probably nominated back in Nov if not before . It was clear he was going to weaken America as much as possible, suck up to muslims and hate the right people.
 
Whoever see what the world is really like with a guy like Obama in the white house, will also understand why Bush was the way he was.

It is interesting how prior to January 20, it was all about change. Now, we can't go one week without people defending Obama and the Democrats by saying, "well, Republicans/Bush did it too!"

Funny how the more things change, the more they actually stay the same.

Funny how the airways are absolutely full of million dollar ads against the upcoming changes.

First, you rail, scream, froth at the mouth, and generally piss your pants about the changes that are being made.

Then you stand and loudly scream that there are no changes.

You fellows are coming across as a lowbrow comedy act. Voting in 2010 will reflect that.
 
Ame®icano;1599864 said:
Most liberals thought this was premature as did a lot of the press. Myself included.

On the second thought, was it really premature or they knew exactly what they were doing?

Europe in Obama recognized the guy who is willing to play by their rules, in other words, he's weak enough to bend over and suck it up to them. Twelve days in the office was enough time for them to realize that two-faced Obama is their guy.

Whoever see what the world is really like with a guy like Obama in the white house, will also understand why Bush was the way he was.

I dont know why people think he was nominated after he took office, He was probably nominated back in Nov if not before . It was clear he was going to weaken America as much as possible, suck up to muslims and hate the right people.

And, worst of all, become a successful President that the American people admire.
 
Change is meaningless without direction. People who protest Obama are protesting the direction of the change. Many of his policies are exactly the same as Bushs' yet no one protests them anymore. See the difference ?
 
Ame®icano;1599864 said:
On the second thought, was it really premature or they knew exactly what they were doing?

Europe in Obama recognized the guy who is willing to play by their rules, in other words, he's weak enough to bend over and suck it up to them. Twelve days in the office was enough time for them to realize that two-faced Obama is their guy.

Whoever see what the world is really like with a guy like Obama in the white house, will also understand why Bush was the way he was.

I dont know why people think he was nominated after he took office, He was probably nominated back in Nov if not before . It was clear he was going to weaken America as much as possible, suck up to muslims and hate the right people.

And, worst of all, become a successful President that the American people admire.

Could you please list some of his successes?
 
Ame®icano;1599864 said:
On the second thought, was it really premature or they knew exactly what they were doing?

Europe in Obama recognized the guy who is willing to play by their rules, in other words, he's weak enough to bend over and suck it up to them. Twelve days in the office was enough time for them to realize that two-faced Obama is their guy.

Whoever see what the world is really like with a guy like Obama in the white house, will also understand why Bush was the way he was.

I dont know why people think he was nominated after he took office, He was probably nominated back in Nov if not before . It was clear he was going to weaken America as much as possible, suck up to muslims and hate the right people.

And, worst of all, become a successful President that the American people admire.
No one admires a pandering coward except our enemies .
 
Whoever see what the world is really like with a guy like Obama in the white house, will also understand why Bush was the way he was.

It is interesting how prior to January 20, it was all about change. Now, we can't go one week without people defending Obama and the Democrats by saying, "well, Republicans/Bush did it too!"

Funny how the more things change, the more they actually stay the same.

Funny how the airways are absolutely full of million dollar ads against the upcoming changes.

First, you rail, scream, froth at the mouth, and generally piss your pants about the changes that are being made.

Then you stand and loudly scream that there are no changes.

You fellows are coming across as a lowbrow comedy act. Voting in 2010 will reflect that.

Describing us as screaming, foaming at the mouth pants-wetters at the notion of "change"? That's comedy.
 
Yeah, everyone pretty much agrees that Obama didn't deserve the Peace Prize, including Obama.

The only difference is how rabid one side or other becomes because the world apparently really likes Obama.

If everyone agrees he didn't deserve this, I wouldn't be surprised to see global opinion of him decline a few points as a result of it.

Why? Obama didn't give the award to himself.

He stated he thinks he didn't do anything to deserve it, and said he will try to excel in the future to live up to the award.

If anything, the global opinion of the Nobel Prize should decline a few points.
 
Yeah, everyone pretty much agrees that Obama didn't deserve the Peace Prize, including Obama.

The only difference is how rabid one side or other becomes because the world apparently really likes Obama.

If everyone agrees he didn't deserve this, I wouldn't be surprised to see global opinion of him decline a few points as a result of it.

Why? Obama didn't give the award to himself.

He stated he thinks he didn't do anything to deserve it, and said he will try to excel in the future to live up to the award.

If anything, the global opinion of the Nobel Prize should decline a few points.

a few points-----??? How turn into a worthless piece of junk.
 
I dont know why people think he was nominated after he took office, He was probably nominated back in Nov if not before . It was clear he was going to weaken America as much as possible, suck up to muslims and hate the right people.

So then I guess there must have been a bunch of terrorist attacks since Obama took office then?

Hmmm, guess not...

I guess he must be letting terrorists slip through his fingers?

Nope, looks like he's on top of that too.

Perhaps some rogue nation has invaded someone else? Has Iraq gone to pieces? Perhaps he's lessened our troop presence in Afghanistan?

No, looks like that didn't happen either.

Did he lessen security on ports? I haven't seen any evidence of that.

So, tell us, what evidence do you have that Obama has "weakened" America in any way?

Please, be specific.
 
If everyone agrees he didn't deserve this, I wouldn't be surprised to see global opinion of him decline a few points as a result of it.

Why? Obama didn't give the award to himself.

He stated he thinks he didn't do anything to deserve it, and said he will try to excel in the future to live up to the award.

If anything, the global opinion of the Nobel Prize should decline a few points.

a few points-----??? How turn into a worthless piece of junk.

Well, we pretty much knew the Peace Prize was garbage when Hitler received it.

At least the other Nobel Prizes actually mean something.
 
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom