JakeWIlls92
Gold Member
- Apr 6, 2014
- 1,755
- 163
- 130
We would have less poverty if poor people did not have kids.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No shit Sherlock.We would have less poverty if poor people did not have kids.
Besides bitching here, what are you doing about it?I don't want any more poor people in our society!
What do you think abortion on demand is?What you propose; if you are being serious, is nothing short of economic eugenics.
A woman's right to choice.What do you think abortion on demand is?What you propose; if you are being serious, is nothing short of economic eugenics.
What do you think abortion on demand is?What you propose; if you are being serious, is nothing short of economic eugenics.
So, why do we pay poor people to have kids?
Would you approve of mandatory Norplant for poor young girls, and sterilization of poor, unmarried women after a certain number of Medicaid babies?
How many babies from one poor mother does the state have an obligation to support?
So, why do we pay poor people to have kids?
Would you approve of mandatory Norplant for poor young girls, and sterilization of poor, unmarried women after a certain number of Medicaid babies?
How many babies from one poor mother does the state have an obligation to support?
That has been my position for a long long time.
But the easier solution is just to explain to the welfare recipient. You will get help for two kids. After that, you are on your own. The end.
To expensive for the Norplant and the people to administer this type of birth control program.
Then tell the wealth accumulators to spread the wealth...I don't want any more poor people in our society!
BC should be available at every possible outlet, courtesy of the taxpayers who do not want to feed unwanted feral children.
Abortion on demand should be available at every public clinic, at every doctor's office that gets federal funds, and even at veterinary clinics, since it is a simple procedure.
The medical profession would never want that.So, why do we pay poor people to have kids?
Would you approve of mandatory Norplant for poor young girls, and sterilization of poor, unmarried women after a certain number of Medicaid babies?
How many babies from one poor mother does the state have an obligation to support?
That has been my position for a long long time.
But the easier solution is just to explain to the welfare recipient. You will get help for two kids. After that, you are on your own. The end.
To expensive for the Norplant and the people to administer this type of birth control program.
I am a realist.
BC should be available at every possible outlet, courtesy of the taxpayers who do not want to feed unwanted feral children.
Abortion on demand should be available at every public clinic, at every doctor's office that gets federal funds, and even at veterinary clinics, since it is a simple procedure.
So you think that unlimited kids are provided for now?BC should be available at every possible outlet, courtesy of the taxpayers who do not want to feed unwanted feral children.
Abortion on demand should be available at every public clinic, at every doctor's office that gets federal funds, and even at veterinary clinics, since it is a simple procedure.
BC and abortion won't work. I know of poor white and black women who had kids BECAUSE they wanted someone to love them. And someone to love. They won't abort. Or use BC.
Hell some, lots of the women have kids to try and keep the babies daddy around.
Nah. Some help for two kids and that's it. Period, End of story. Have 12 kids but whatever happens to them is on you.
The other choice is forced sterilization. And that idea won't go far.
What about dentists, I know its the other end but they are used to extractions.So, why do we pay poor people to have kids?
Would you approve of mandatory Norplant for poor young girls, and sterilization of poor, unmarried women after a certain number of Medicaid babies?
How many babies from one poor mother does the state have an obligation to support?
That has been my position for a long long time.
But the easier solution is just to explain to the welfare recipient. You will get help for two kids. After that, you are on your own. The end.
To expensive for the Norplant and the people to administer this type of birth control program.
I am a realist.
BC should be available at every possible outlet, courtesy of the taxpayers who do not want to feed unwanted feral children.
Abortion on demand should be available at every public clinic, at every doctor's office that gets federal funds, and even at veterinary clinics, since it is a simple procedure.
So you think that unlimited kids are provided for now?
Why after nearly 50 years or $306 billion a year and NOW we have a higher % of blacks born out of wedlock and higher % of blacks having abortions?What do you think abortion on demand is?What you propose; if you are being serious, is nothing short of economic eugenics.
I'd say two only in the case of twins.BC should be available at every possible outlet, courtesy of the taxpayers who do not want to feed unwanted feral children.
Abortion on demand should be available at every public clinic, at every doctor's office that gets federal funds, and even at veterinary clinics, since it is a simple procedure.
BC and abortion won't work. I know of poor white and black women who had kids BECAUSE they wanted someone to love them. And someone to love. They won't abort. Or use BC.
Hell some, lots of the women have kids to try and keep the babies daddy around.
Nah. Some help for two kids and that's it. Period, End of story. Have 12 kids but whatever happens to them is on you.
The other choice is forced sterilization. And that idea won't go far.