Polls really missed the mark

[bill718]

Margin of error 3 points!?

It looks more like 15 points to me. You'd get better results throwing darts at a board.

Any idea how these (so called) scientific polls were so far off?

 

[theHawk]

Margin of error 3 points!?

It looks more like 15 points to me. You'd get better results throwing darts at a board.

Any idea how these (so called) scientific polls were so far off?

Because they are run by Deep State propagandists.

Do you not know how many “media” people are actually ex-CIA?

 

[Oddball]

Who in their right mind wants to be honest with, even if they bother to talking to, such obvious propagandist liars?

 

[Delldude]

Read many on the right don't want to deal with pollsters. Probably contributes.

 

[jc456]

Margin of error 3 points!?

It looks more like 15 points to me. You'd get better results throwing darts at a board.

Any idea how these (so called) scientific polls were so far off?

maybe stop predicting and let election day come and go. Pull the money out of it. It's what the elite's love.

 

[jc456]

Read many on the right don't want to deal with pollsters. Probably contributes.

It's why they are fking useless.

 

[elektra]

How can loaded questions and false premises result in polling numbers being wrong?

 

[jbrownson0831]

Margin of error 3 points!?

It looks more like 15 points to me. You'd get better results throwing darts at a board.

Any idea how these (so called) scientific polls were so far off?

They under poll Trump and way over poll the ho. Folks like at Gold Crown Politics then apply statistical models to these skewed results and come out with real numbers, like Gold Crown predicting 312-224 for Trump which it will be when the remaining states finally report.

 

[jc456]

How can loaded questions and false premises result in polling numbers being wrong?

 

[DGS49]

It would be helpful if the OP would cite a few late polls where the ultimate result was beyond the conceded margin of error. I don't see any.

 

[jc456]

maybe stop predicting and let election day come and go. Pull the money out of it. It's what the elite's love.

how many times a day did you all hear the demofks invoke trump's name in an advertisement or on the set of the media biased news? I estimate for myself, at least twenty times a day I heard some demofk say something derogatory about trump. Fk, they drove everyone to vote for him. Trump got free advertising because those idiots didn't say what they would do to help the people. all missing.

 

[Woodznutz]

Read many on the right don't want to deal with pollsters. Probably contributes.

I lied to a Dem pollster. I told him that I hadn't made up my mind yet.

 

[ZestolPastilevsky]

After 2016 I put no stock in polls.

 

[jc456]

After 2016 I put no stock in polls.

that's when I realized they were totally for shit.

 

[JohnDB]

Margin of error 3 points!?

It looks more like 15 points to me. You'd get better results throwing darts at a board.

Any idea how these (so called) scientific polls were so far off?

They artificially showed Harris up all along the way to help her fundraise and have enough money to keep up the appearance of having a viable campaign.

IOW they lied to everyone with collusion and organization. It qualifies under RICO establishment laws as collusion. Your average Democrat Party member who contributed has standing to sue for criminal charges of fraud...as well as force their state AG to bring criminal charges against these agencies as well as the entire Harris campaign. Especially if they are an MSM account....because they are definitely going to be on the backs of their heels soon enough.

 

[ZestolPastilevsky]

that's when I realized they were totally for shit.

The thing with polls, at least nowadays, is that they're more about what the publisher WANTS to be true.

 

[toobfreak]

Any idea how these (so called) scientific polls were so far off?

Because close races make for good news items, keeps viewers tuning in.
More viewers, more advertising bucks.

 

[1srelluc]

maybe stop predicting and let election day come and go. Pull the money out of it. It's what the elite's love.

Too much money in clicks and ratings to let that happen.

 

[Rawley]

Because they are run by Deep State propagandists.

Do you not know how many “media” people are actually ex-CIA?

Was it a scam just to get them out to the polls?

 

[Oddball]