It’s just their inability to deal with reality. It’s the nature of their being. That is why they are the party of transgenderism. People who can’t deal with reality.Was it a scam just to get them out to the polls?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s just their inability to deal with reality. It’s the nature of their being. That is why they are the party of transgenderism. People who can’t deal with reality.Was it a scam just to get them out to the polls?
Homey D Clown was the best.
Perhaps people were too embarrassed to admit they were voting for the orange buffoon.Margin of error 3 points!?
I told them twice I liked Kamala.....I lied to a Dem pollster. I told him that I hadn't made up my mind yet.![]()
No chance it's NYB?Perhaps people were too embarrassed to admit they were voting for the orange buffoon.
They sell a product and tailor it to the buyer.Margin of error 3 points!?
It looks more like 15 points to me. You'd get better results throwing darts at a board.
Any idea how these (so called) scientific polls were so far off?
Who answers their phone anymore when a strange number comes up?Margin of error 3 points!?
It looks more like 15 points to me. You'd get better results throwing darts at a board.
Any idea how these (so called) scientific polls were so far off?
I get these calls from the Chiefs of Police association and a related fire association. PIA. So I answer and make up a foreign languge every time. Big pause, it's driven by a program, then they apologize and remove me from their call list.....takes a couple calls then it stops.Who answers their phone anymore when a strange number comes up?
The margin or error has always been a crock of shit. You poll a thousand people out of 150 million, get your results, and then claim that if you extrapolate your poll out to those 150 million that your poll results might be off by 3% from your original 1000 people.Margin of error 3 points!?
It looks more like 15 points to me. You'd get better results throwing darts at a board.
Any idea how these (so called) scientific polls were so far off?
I get these calls from the Chiefs of Police association and a related fire association. PIA. So I answer and make up a foreign languge every time. Big pause, it's driven by a program, then they apologize and remove me from their call list.....takes a couple calls then it stops.
Two snaps in a circle!Homey D Clown was the best.
Back when blacks could make fun of themselves and white people and everyone else and no one was butthurt by it.
Good thinking!I get these calls from the Chiefs of Police association and a related fire association. PIA. So I answer and make up a foreign languge every time. Big pause, it's driven by a program, then they apologize and remove me from their call list.....takes a couple calls then it stops.
I love the ones who want to buy my house....... I tell them such an inflated price.......they don't call back.I just block all the calls from numbers I don't know if they don't leave a message or do leave a message and it is spam. We have directv and they seem to have a bottomless pit of telephone numbers to call you from.
I usually get those in the mail.I love the ones who want to buy my house....... I tell them such an inflated price.......they don't call back.
That's how I view them. If you ask the same questions over a period of time you can fairly accurately identify trends. A single snapshot in time isn't really that useful.The margin or error has always been a crock of shit. You poll a thousand people out of 150 million, get your results, and then claim that if you extrapolate your poll out to those 150 million that your poll results might be off by 3% from your original 1000 people.
However, polls are very useful in determining trends.
Zackly.Who answers their phone anymore when a strange number comes up?