Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Give the definition of the GOF research that the NIH continued to ban.For those who actually paid attention and were smart enough to stay focused it is obvious that Paul nailed Dr, Fauci dead-to-rights once again, that Dr. Fauci lied to Congress regarding NIH funding of GoF research in Wuhan.
FOCUS: The subject / issue is 'Dr. Fauci lied to Congress regarding NIH funding of GoF research in Wuhan.'
Paul pointed out the FACT that Fauci previously declared he had NOT funded GoF research at the Wuhan lab
Paul pointed out the FACT that Fauci had directed / affected NIH grant funding of the Wuhan Lab
Paul previously, when this came out, forced Fauci to admit under oath that he (Fauci) could not guarantee that once the money was put in the CCP's / Wuhan Lab's that it did NOT go to GoF Research, that it was very possibLe that the money was used to do GoF research
Paul read Dr. Fauci's own definition of Gof research then pointed out what was done at the Wuhan lab matched Fauci's exact definition of GoF research
(Previously Fauci's own past Comments about he fully supported GoF research EVEN IF THERE WAS A THREAT OF A LEAK / PANDEMIC)
AT THIS POINT, KNOWING HE WAS CAUGHT, DR. FAUCI COMPLETELY CHANGED THE SUBJECT OF DISCUSSION BYACCUSING PAUL OF ACCUSING HIM OF KILLING MILLIONS OF PEOPLE ALL OVER THE WORLD WITH COVID-19......
Paul NEVER accused Fauci of conducting GoF research that resulted in COVID-19 that most probably leaked from the Wuhan Lab
Paul NEVER accused Fauci of leaking the virus
Paul NEVER accused Fauci of killing millions of people all over the world with COVID-19
Paul made it clear that Fauci provided the CCP / Wuhan Lab with funding that was most probably used to conduct GoF research, which he did
The subject of discussion was NOT if Fauci had 'killed' millions, but Fauci swiftly changed the topic by falsely accusing Paul of accusing him (Fauci) of being responsible for COVID-19 / of killing millions around the world and 'killing' the global economy
Paul nailed Fauci on his part in NIH funding the Wuhan lab, which Fauci did deny earlier of having anything to do with.
You must have watched a different video.Yes, show the video. Paul is just gaslighting you and has nothing.
You’ll have to produce the documented definition according to NIH and the text of the grant then, if we’re going to do commands to the prisoners.Give the definition of the GOF research that the NIH continued to ban.
Tell us what Fauci and the grant applicationsaid was being funded by the NIH grant.
See the difference?
My definition of GoF research does not matter. Paul read FAUCI's definition of GoF research, and it was Fauci's definition that is important. Again, by Fauci's own definition of GoF research Fauci funded GoF research at the Wuhan lab.Give the definition of the GOF research that the NIH continued to ban.
Tell us what Fauci and the grant applicationsaid was being funded by the NIH grant.
See the difference?
Almost verbatim what Rand read to Fauci, and it is EXACTLY what happened.Gain-of-function research is medical research that alters an organism or disease in a way that increases pathogenesis, transmissibility, or host range. This research is intended to reveal targets to better predict emerging infectious diseases and to develop vaccines and therapeutics.
Except it is true.Previous post is yet another maga fuckup brought to you by Angry White Fuckups, Inc.
We all know Congress can do insider trading without consequence, but does anyone know if lying government stooge bureaucrats also are immune from prosecution of insider trading?Thanks for the Moderna info. We were tracking the J&J-Janssen fentanyl trajectory connected to CDC scrubbing info on their Variants page, which links to data on the performance of various vaccines. The hot statistic would be to find out if Fau Chi’s stock investment was more or less intelligent than the other ones.
Most definitely SEC. Fau Chi’s years on the HIV/AIDS committees gave him the avaricious overconfidence necessary to finally cause his (organism [italics]) to balk at the contradictions. Thus, the Freudian slip.We all know Congress can do insider trading without consequence, but does anyone know if lying government stooge bureaucrats also are immune from prosecution of insider trading?
The SEC should be looking into this, right?
What's Rand's evidence...?My definition of GoF research does not matter. Paul read FAUCI's definition of GoF research, and it was Fauci's definition that is important. Again, by Fauci's own definition of GoF research Fauci funded GoF research at the Wuhan lab.
Post emRead his emails....that is where he said they were useless....
Yeah.....it's not true because we're wacists.Previous post is yet another maga fuckup brought to you by Angry White Fuckups, Inc.
It's not true because the facts say otherwise.Yeah.....it's not true because we're wacists.
You call anyone who doesn't agree with your bullshit a racist.It's not true because the facts say otherwise.
That you are racists is besides the point
Dum Dum, you go back to OP’s post and read the report Rand is using to expose the c**t. It’s a scientific report, so a word of caution Is apropo.What's Rand's evidence...?
other countries might want to sue dr fauci and the US governmentRand Paul says he has written to the DOJ seeking a criminal referral of Dr. Fauci for lying to Congress after expert insisted he had not funded gain of function research at Wuhan lab during fractious exchange
I will be sending a letter to Department of Justice asking for a criminal referral because he has lied to congress,' Paul told Sean Hannity.
- The Kentucky senator appeared on Sean Hannity's Fox News show on Tuesday
- Paul earlier on Tuesday had angrily clashed with Dr Anthony Fauci in the Senate
- He accused Fauci of lying when he said he did not fund gain of function research
- Fauci hit back, telling Paul that he was the one who was spreading lies
- Tuesday night Paul said he wanted a criminal complaint for lying to Congress
![]()
Rand Paul is seeking a criminal referral of Dr Anthony Fauci
The Kentucky senator on Tuesday night announced that he was taking his explosive confrontation with Fauci one step further, and was seeking a criminal referral for the 80-year-old health expert.www.dailymail.co.uk
It's too bad the DOJ is so crooked. It will probably go nowhere.
No, rand read what his source considered gain of function.You must have watched a different video.
Rand read to Fauci the industry definition of gain-of-function, and Fauci completely ignored it and deflected to some bullshit about some records.