There's something wrong with taunts about anonymity coming from someone named "Dr Grump". Post your full name, address, telephone and employer name, address and telephone, and then we'll be getting somewhere. Needless to say, you won't, so we need not tarry over that one.
And, for what it's worth, my real name does appear, proximate to the issues I care about, in places accessible to anyone. What do you think of that?
Any disbarrment proceeding against someone for their political beliefs would be one hell of a fun Constitutional fight. When Matt Hale was having his troubles, Alan Dershowitz (with his own curveball handy) volunteered to go to bat for him against the Illinois bar.
My employer surely would not be pleased, and, like many employers, would probably fire me. Though I have some thoughts on fighting that one, too: there is a public policy exception to the at-will doctrine, and I think it would be good to poke at it with a lawsuit. Like my views or don't, I've got a First Amendment right to express them as against government. As a lawyer, I've even got a duty to be an advocate for unpopular causes, and mine sure as hell is unpopular. Under the civil rights laws, you cannot fire one on account of race. I would argue for expansion of that to include racial advocacy. If a black attorney were fired by his employer for writing for the NAACP journal, you can bet your ass he'd have the biggest legal guns in America lining up alongside him. Even in the event the whole thing were lost, the publicity alone would give attention to a cause that I believe to be very important: the cause of whites as a future minority in America.
But I guess the really scary thing is that you'd deny me employement for my views. I hear all the time from people on this board that they're going to kill me, rape my daughter, hope the JDL kills me, laugh while blacks drag me behind a truck, etc. Few ever seem interested in arguing on the merits with me. But this in turn is instructive. What it tells me isn't that I'm wrong. What it tells me is that I've tapped into something so fundamental that people can't even deal with it with a level head. I actually think this is somewhat of a problem, and demonstrates the difficulty of addressing these issues in a rational and humane way. That is to say, I can't really bring all this up around the water cooler, true. "So, Fred, how about those Giants?" "I don't know Bill, how about what's happening to the white race?" Yeah, I get that. I speak pretty freely about how I won't, but the funny thing is, I don't really get credit for that --- most just say, we'll, you're scared. I have to laugh. I imagine so many other posters as pretty quiet people in their own lives. If you can afford to spout at work what you say here, well, great. I can't. But again, I don't see that as the equivalent of issue illegitimacy. To the contrary.
One poster commented in private to me that I was never going to convince anyone of my views, because they all just hear "kill anyone who isn't white" and nothing else. That's sadly true. But that narrative must, must, must change. Whites are human beings. They are a unique group, at least as against other groups. We have a right to peace and progress. We can no longer hold on to the narrative that has us as the bad guys and blacks, Jews, etc. as the perpetual good guys. That HAS to change. Racial separation as a solution? Impractical, but worth at least considering, and in the meantime, we desperately need a change of thinking about race. Would anyone stop to consider the human misery among all caused by failing to acknowledge racial differences? That is, the opposite extreme of a Hitler? The writer Peter Brimelow called this "Hitler's Revenge," and it's coming down, boy.
