it has already been posted
one day you claimed you couldnt read it
although everyone else could
No it hasnt. I am curious to see the autopsy report that claims Brown was the one that advanced on Wilson. If you have it cough it up. If not I will have to believe you are full of it and no longer worth conversing with.
No autopsy report said that because that isn't what autopsy reports are used to determine...
That's actually not correct. Autopsies ARE used to help determine angle and trajectory of rounds and such. Autopsies reveal much more than just cause of death.
There is no autopsy that can
prove one person was advancing instead of the other party if they are facing each other. Didnt you say you were an MP?
Did I say "an autopsy can prove whether a shooter was advancing on the target or not?"
However, let me add this
They can point to the fact, maybe not PROVE, but yes a good medical examiner can you tell which rounds likely hit the target in which order, and ballistics can tell you within a reasonable certainty how far the shooter was from the target with each round.
So, yes a good medical examiner can make an educated guess as to whether or not the shooter was advancing as he fired.
but remember, that doesn't prove anything, because the ballistics would look similar whether Wilson was advancing on Brown or Brown was advancing on Wilson.