Playmate, porn star and reality TV contestant in court over Trump

[EvilEyeFleegle]

3 sluts...

It matters? Either he did..or he didn't. I think we all know he did. We can play word games all day.....but the truth is apparent. NDA's are there for a reason.

 

[OldLady]

You are the one saying a drug addict whore is the best you have to get Trump, go for it!

Uhhh..this is 2018..blaming the victim no longer works. The only questions relevant are questions of fact. Did he? Did she? When and where?

Like I said, your best hope is now a drug addict whore desperate for more money to feed her addiction.

Like every jury is told, you can choose to ignore any witness you do not find credible.

Lol..so you're saying that jury nullification is your best defense? Personally, judging by historical fact, if someone told me Trump had fucked a chimp at the NYC zoo..I'd believe them! He has zero self-control when it comes to his sexual desires. A whore? Maybe...but he still fucked her while married. One might have something to say about his taste in women..but a stiff Trump has no conscience.

Affairs happen.

But this..this is a lifestyle. It speaks to Trump's sense of entitlement.

True. but "he still fucked her while married....no conscience" doesn't take that into account.
You know what this shows, Fleegle? That Trump viewed the pretty women as a commodity to buy and enjoy, something provided as entertainment at parties. Women as sex object. It's Trump all over.
It pisses me off that with an attitude like that, he has the sheer balls to call them all "liars" when they break his dirty secrets. Somehow, that's not fair.

 

[dannyboys]

Playmate, porn star and reality TV contestant in court over Trump

One day..this is all going to destroy Trump...

Why do you think that? With all the insanity of the Trump administration, marital fidelity is a drop in the bucket.

In the end..public opinion is what drives our electoral system. When all is said and done..it's just a big popularity contest--and Trump...is is systematically being destroyed..in the eyes of most of America. IMO, of course. I admit that there are those who think that this is all cool..and that fucking whatever you want...is the mark of an 'alpha' male.
I think that those people are in the minority though.

Time will tell.

The minute a single Trump supporter changes their mind by all means let us know.
Stormy 'JUGS' Daniels isn't going to say a fucking word on Sunday night that will cost her whatever money she has left. Her pimp/lawyer isn't working for blow jobs.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Uhhh..this is 2018..blaming the victim no longer works. The only questions relevant are questions of fact. Did he? Did she? When and where?

Like I said, your best hope is now a drug addict whore desperate for more money to feed her addiction.

Like every jury is told, you can choose to ignore any witness you do not find credible.

Lol..so you're saying that jury nullification is your best defense? Personally, judging by historical fact, if someone told me Trump had fucked a chimp at the NYC zoo..I'd believe them! He has zero self-control when it comes to his sexual desires. A whore? Maybe...but he still fucked her while married. One might have something to say about his taste in women..but a stiff Trump has no conscience.

Affairs happen.

But this..this is a lifestyle. It speaks to Trump's sense of entitlement.

True. but "he still fucked her while married....no conscience" doesn't take that into account.
You know what this shows, Fleegle? That Trump viewed the pretty women as a commodity to buy and enjoy, something provided as entertainment at parties. Women as sex object. It's Trump all over.
It pisses me off that with an attitude like that, he has the sheer balls to call them all "liars" when they break his dirty secrets. Somehow, that's not fair.

Almost as good as what Hillary did to Monica.

But that was OK because he was a Democrat b

 

[centerleftFL]

Playmate, porn star and reality TV contestant in court over Trump

One day..this is all going to destroy Trump...BTW I find it ironic that it's a decision in the Clinton Paula Jones case that is being used as precedent against Trump!

'A judge ruled Tuesday that a former “Apprentice” contestant’s defamation lawsuit against President Trump may proceed, potentially allowing her lawyers to begin collecting evidence to support her claim that he forcibly kissed and groped her years ago.


The decision in the case brought by Summer Zervos came on the same day a former Playboy playmate, Karen McDougal, sued the publisher of the National Enquirer for the right to break her silence about the 10-month affair she says she had with Trump more than a decade ago.


The nearly simultaneous developments added to the political and legal challenges for the president, who has faced weeks of reports about his alleged affair with another woman, porn star Stormy Daniels, and his attorney’s effort to buy her silence.

All three women are now seeking to tell their stories on their own terms. McDougal is scheduled to give an interview Thursday to CNN’s Anderson Cooper, while “60 Minutes” is scheduled to air an interview with Daniels on Sunday.


As she rejected Trump’s effort to block Zervos’s lawsuit from proceeding, New York Supreme Court Justice Jennifer G. Schecter cited precedent from the Paula Jones case against President Bill Clinton, which led to his impeachment in 1998.


“No one is above the law,” Schecter wrote. “It is settled that the President of the United States has no immunity and is ‘subject to the laws’ for purely private acts.”'

Can you dive any lower into the cesspool to find someone who claims they have dirt on Trump?

Errr...I forgot you guys think that the WaPo is on a par with InfoWars. This is the news of the day...agree, disagree, debunk it if you can--but this is what is happening.
If you don't like it..perhaps you should write a letter to Trump..asking him to please keep his sense of entitlement from ruling his sex life.

From where I sit...this is all falling apart on him..his NDA agreements are in tatters...and hey...this is totally consistent with how he's lived his life. He flaunted his affairs--now let him defend them.

It sounds to me like the ladies trying to break their NDA's are going to lose. It's really page 2 news, imo. There are important things going on, and baiting the Pres with stuff like this is just a lot of noise. It only makes him look bad to the people who don't support him anyway. It's not going to accomplish anything but make a bunch of static to make it harder to hear the important stuff.

You don't know that. Depends on the 'CONTRACTS'. One made it through the courts yesterday and just like Clinton, the plaintiff was allowed to proceed. He's got 3 of them nipping at his ass.