Plan to transfer Arab-Israelis to new Palestinian state seeks legal approval

[pbel]

There you have it folks, the Israeli Foreign Minister Lieberman is making plans for back door expulsions.

Plan to transfer Arab-Israelis to new Palestinian state seeks legal approval | World news | theguardian.com

Israel's foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, has commissioned a confidential legal opinion that argues it would be legal under international law to transfer Arab-Israeli citizens to a new Palestinian state by shifting the border.

The internal foreign ministry document, leaked to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, makes clear that the controversial proposal, which the rightwing foreign minister has been promoting for some years, would only be in line with international law if executed with the consent of those being transferred, and if it did not leave any of those transferred without any kind of citizenship.

The opinion appears to have been commissioned to lay the legal groundwork for the so-called Lieberman plan – or "populated-area exchange plan" – which he first proposed in 2004. The idea is that Israel will retain Jewish areas in the West Bank in exchange for giving the Palestinian Authority populous Israeli Arab areas within Israel, including the Galilee Triangle and the Wadi Ara valley, which includes cities such as Umm el-Fahm. However, the plan is opposed strongly by many Israeli Arabs

 

[Phoenall]

There you have it folks, the Israeli Foreign Minister Lieberman is making plans for back door expulsions.

Plan to transfer Arab-Israelis to new Palestinian state seeks legal approval | World news | theguardian.com

Israel's foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, has commissioned a confidential legal opinion that argues it would be legal under international law to transfer Arab-Israeli citizens to a new Palestinian state by shifting the border.

The internal foreign ministry document, leaked to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, makes clear that the controversial proposal, which the rightwing foreign minister has been promoting for some years, would only be in line with international law if executed with the consent of those being transferred, and if it did not leave any of those transferred without any kind of citizenship.

The opinion appears to have been commissioned to lay the legal groundwork for the so-called Lieberman plan – or "populated-area exchange plan" – which he first proposed in 2004. The idea is that Israel will retain Jewish areas in the West Bank in exchange for giving the Palestinian Authority populous Israeli Arab areas within Israel, including the Galilee Triangle and the Wadi Ara valley, which includes cities such as Umm el-Fahm. However, the plan is opposed strongly by many Israeli Arabs

So what about this part of the report that you disregarded completely

The internal foreign ministry document, leaked to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, makes clear that the controversial proposal, which the rightwing foreign minister has been promoting for some years, would only be in line with international law if executed with the consent of those being transferred, and if it did not leave any of those transferred without any kind of citizenship.

So not as you portay it as an ethnic cleansing but a simple matter of what the arab Israelis would like. And it is just a Legal Opinion and not a demand or plans of back door expulsions as you claim.

Caught out LYING FOR ISLAM again and putting in words that were never there in the first place.

 

[P F Tinmore]

There you have it folks, the Israeli Foreign Minister Lieberman is making plans for back door expulsions.

Plan to transfer Arab-Israelis to new Palestinian state seeks legal approval | World news | theguardian.com

Israel's foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, has commissioned a confidential legal opinion that argues it would be legal under international law to transfer Arab-Israeli citizens to a new Palestinian state by shifting the border.

The internal foreign ministry document, leaked to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, makes clear that the controversial proposal, which the rightwing foreign minister has been promoting for some years, would only be in line with international law if executed with the consent of those being transferred, and if it did not leave any of those transferred without any kind of citizenship.

The opinion appears to have been commissioned to lay the legal groundwork for the so-called Lieberman plan – or "populated-area exchange plan" – which he first proposed in 2004. The idea is that Israel will retain Jewish areas in the West Bank in exchange for giving the Palestinian Authority populous Israeli Arab areas within Israel, including the Galilee Triangle and the Wadi Ara valley, which includes cities such as Umm el-Fahm. However, the plan is opposed strongly by many Israeli Arabs

So what about this part of the report that you disregarded completely

The internal foreign ministry document, leaked to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, makes clear that the controversial proposal, which the rightwing foreign minister has been promoting for some years, would only be in line with international law if executed with the consent of those being transferred, and if it did not leave any of those transferred without any kind of citizenship.

So not as you portay it as an ethnic cleansing but a simple matter of what the arab Israelis would like. And it is just a Legal Opinion and not a demand or plans of back door expulsions as you claim.

Caught out LYING FOR ISLAM again and putting in words that were never there in the first place.

Where was that legally required consent when the land was transferred from Palestine to Israel in 1948?

 

[toastman]

There you have it folks, the Israeli Foreign Minister Lieberman is making plans for back door expulsions.

Plan to transfer Arab-Israelis to new Palestinian state seeks legal approval | World news | theguardian.com

Israel's foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, has commissioned a confidential legal opinion that argues it would be legal under international law to transfer Arab-Israeli citizens to a new Palestinian state by shifting the border.

The internal foreign ministry document, leaked to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, makes clear that the controversial proposal, which the rightwing foreign minister has been promoting for some years, would only be in line with international law if executed with the consent of those being transferred, and if it did not leave any of those transferred without any kind of citizenship.

The opinion appears to have been commissioned to lay the legal groundwork for the so-called Lieberman plan – or "populated-area exchange plan" – which he first proposed in 2004. The idea is that Israel will retain Jewish areas in the West Bank in exchange for giving the Palestinian Authority populous Israeli Arab areas within Israel, including the Galilee Triangle and the Wadi Ara valley, which includes cities such as Umm el-Fahm. However, the plan is opposed strongly by many Israeli Arabs

So what about this part of the report that you disregarded completely

The internal foreign ministry document, leaked to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, makes clear that the controversial proposal, which the rightwing foreign minister has been promoting for some years, would only be in line with international law if executed with the consent of those being transferred, and if it did not leave any of those transferred without any kind of citizenship.

So not as you portay it as an ethnic cleansing but a simple matter of what the arab Israelis would like. And it is just a Legal Opinion and not a demand or plans of back door expulsions as you claim.

Caught out LYING FOR ISLAM again and putting in words that were never there in the first place.

Where was that legally required consent when the land was transferred from Palestine to Israel in 1948?

There was no legally REQUIRED consent of land transfer. You made that up, remember?
Unless you have a link that says there was required consent of land transfer??

 

[P F Tinmore]

So what about this part of the report that you disregarded completely

The internal foreign ministry document, leaked to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, makes clear that the controversial proposal, which the rightwing foreign minister has been promoting for some years, would only be in line with international law if executed with the consent of those being transferred, and if it did not leave any of those transferred without any kind of citizenship.

So not as you portay it as an ethnic cleansing but a simple matter of what the arab Israelis would like. And it is just a Legal Opinion and not a demand or plans of back door expulsions as you claim.

Caught out LYING FOR ISLAM again and putting in words that were never there in the first place.

Where was that legally required consent when the land was transferred from Palestine to Israel in 1948?

There was no legally REQUIRED consent of land transfer. You made that up, remember?
Unless you have a link that says there was required consent of land transfer??

I am not the one who brought up the consent required.

 

[toastman]

Where was that legally required consent when the land was transferred from Palestine to Israel in 1948?

There was no legally REQUIRED consent of land transfer. You made that up, remember?
Unless you have a link that says there was required consent of land transfer??

I am not the one who brought up the consent required.

You brought up the fictional required consent of land transfer to Israel like you have many times. Stop bringing it up if you can't prove it

 

[ForeverYoung436]

There you have it folks, the Israeli Foreign Minister Lieberman is making plans for back door expulsions.

Plan to transfer Arab-Israelis to new Palestinian state seeks legal approval | World news | theguardian.com

Israel's foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, has commissioned a confidential legal opinion that argues it would be legal under international law to transfer Arab-Israeli citizens to a new Palestinian state by shifting the border.

The internal foreign ministry document, leaked to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, makes clear that the controversial proposal, which the rightwing foreign minister has been promoting for some years, would only be in line with international law if executed with the consent of those being transferred, and if it did not leave any of those transferred without any kind of citizenship.

The opinion appears to have been commissioned to lay the legal groundwork for the so-called Lieberman plan – or "populated-area exchange plan" – which he first proposed in 2004. The idea is that Israel will retain Jewish areas in the West Bank in exchange for giving the Palestinian Authority populous Israeli Arab areas within Israel, including the Galilee Triangle and the Wadi Ara valley, which includes cities such as Umm el-Fahm. However, the plan is opposed strongly by many Israeli Arabs

So what about this part of the report that you disregarded completely

The internal foreign ministry document, leaked to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, makes clear that the controversial proposal, which the rightwing foreign minister has been promoting for some years, would only be in line with international law if executed with the consent of those being transferred, and if it did not leave any of those transferred without any kind of citizenship.

So not as you portay it as an ethnic cleansing but a simple matter of what the arab Israelis would like. And it is just a Legal Opinion and not a demand or plans of back door expulsions as you claim.

Caught out LYING FOR ISLAM again and putting in words that were never there in the first place.

Where was that legally required consent when the land was transferred from Palestine to Israel in 1948?

This thread and article is not talking about 1948, but the HERE AND NOW. And it's quite telling that the Arabs of Galilee, or other parts of Israel proper, don't want their land to become part of a new Palestinian state, nor do they want to become Palestinian citizens.

 

[P F Tinmore]

There was no legally REQUIRED consent of land transfer. You made that up, remember?
Unless you have a link that says there was required consent of land transfer??

I am not the one who brought up the consent required.

You brought up the fictional required consent of land transfer to Israel like you have many times. Stop bringing it up if you can't prove it

You missed the point.

If it is required to have the consent of the people to transfer land to Palestine, where was the people's consent to transfer that land to Israel?

 

[MHunterB]

FY, you forgot the part where Abbas and HAMAS both have said they wouldn't let in any "Palestinians" from Israel as citizens of a Palestinian state. They *could* come and live in refugee camps, though.......

 

[ForeverYoung436]

I am not the one who brought up the consent required.

You brought up the fictional required consent of land transfer to Israel like you have many times. Stop bringing it up if you can't prove it

You missed the point.

If it is required to have the consent of the people to transfer land to Palestine, where was the people's consent to transfer that land to Israel?

You're trying to derail this thread to fit your own agenda, Mr. Tinmore. Can you answer this direct question--why don't Israeli Arabs want to become a part of "Palestine"?

 

[P F Tinmore]

You brought up the fictional required consent of land transfer to Israel like you have many times. Stop bringing it up if you can't prove it

You missed the point.

If it is required to have the consent of the people to transfer land to Palestine, where was the people's consent to transfer that land to Israel?

You're trying to derail this thread to fit your own agenda, Mr. Tinmore. Can you answer this direct question--why don't Israeli Arabs want to become a part of "Palestine"?

Why would they want to live in a state that has been trampled to dust for a hundred years?

What economic opportunities would they have?

 

[toastman]

I am not the one who brought up the consent required.

You brought up the fictional required consent of land transfer to Israel like you have many times. Stop bringing it up if you can't prove it

You missed the point.

If it is required to have the consent of the people to transfer land to Palestine, where was the people's consent to transfer that land to Israel?

Actually, you missed the point. You always being up the transfer of land to The Jews as if it was a requirement for them to declare independence. Ive asked yiu many times for a link to show that that was a requirement. All I get is song and dance

 

[Phoenall]

There you have it folks, the Israeli Foreign Minister Lieberman is making plans for back door expulsions.

Plan to transfer Arab-Israelis to new Palestinian state seeks legal approval | World news | theguardian.com

Israel's foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, has commissioned a confidential legal opinion that argues it would be legal under international law to transfer Arab-Israeli citizens to a new Palestinian state by shifting the border.

The internal foreign ministry document, leaked to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, makes clear that the controversial proposal, which the rightwing foreign minister has been promoting for some years, would only be in line with international law if executed with the consent of those being transferred, and if it did not leave any of those transferred without any kind of citizenship.

The opinion appears to have been commissioned to lay the legal groundwork for the so-called Lieberman plan – or "populated-area exchange plan" – which he first proposed in 2004. The idea is that Israel will retain Jewish areas in the West Bank in exchange for giving the Palestinian Authority populous Israeli Arab areas within Israel, including the Galilee Triangle and the Wadi Ara valley, which includes cities such as Umm el-Fahm. However, the plan is opposed strongly by many Israeli Arabs

So what about this part of the report that you disregarded completely

The internal foreign ministry document, leaked to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, makes clear that the controversial proposal, which the rightwing foreign minister has been promoting for some years, would only be in line with international law if executed with the consent of those being transferred, and if it did not leave any of those transferred without any kind of citizenship.

So not as you portay it as an ethnic cleansing but a simple matter of what the arab Israelis would like. And it is just a Legal Opinion and not a demand or plans of back door expulsions as you claim.

Caught out LYING FOR ISLAM again and putting in words that were never there in the first place.

Where was that legally required consent when the land was transferred from Palestine to Israel in 1948?

It did not apply as the land was under mandate and the parties had already agreed the partition into 5 states, not 6 as the UN declared, with Palestine as we know it today going to the Jews. The Palestinians were a group of itinerant farm workers with no ties to the land, so had no legal right to give consent.

 

[Phoenall]

Where was that legally required consent when the land was transferred from Palestine to Israel in 1948?

There was no legally REQUIRED consent of land transfer. You made that up, remember?
Unless you have a link that says there was required consent of land transfer??

I am not the one who brought up the consent required.

Because in 1948 that consent did not exist as Palestine was not a sovereign nation, just a blot on the map. The LoN and the mandate set in stone the plight of the M.E that has escalated to bloody war at the urging of the arab muslims.

 

[Phoenall]

I am not the one who brought up the consent required.

You brought up the fictional required consent of land transfer to Israel like you have many times. Stop bringing it up if you can't prove it

You missed the point.

If it is required to have the consent of the people to transfer land to Palestine, where was the people's consent to transfer that land to Israel?

And you miss the point by using recent legislation to prop up your failed arguments. Palestine was not a nation until 1988 so it did not have any legal need to give any consent.

 

[P F Tinmore]

You brought up the fictional required consent of land transfer to Israel like you have many times. Stop bringing it up if you can't prove it

You missed the point.

If it is required to have the consent of the people to transfer land to Palestine, where was the people's consent to transfer that land to Israel?

And you miss the point by using recent legislation to prop up your failed arguments. Palestine was not a nation until 1988 so it did not have any legal need to give any consent.

You are incorrect. Look it up.

 

[MHunterB]

Remember, if you don't like the thought of a nation removing citizenship from a segment of its citizenry and nationalizing all their assets before ejecting them - then you MUST be in favor of holding the Arab League nations to account for doing exactly that across the ME. That was an official PLAN which the AL member states agreed upon BEFORE the war in '48.

Just under a million citizens of Egypt, Syria, Iraq, etc were left penniless and homeless and stateless due to that AL agreement.

Why has the "humanitarian, pro-peace" contingent never protested that ACTION in all the years since???