Fmr jarhead said:
Some of it just doesn't add up for me, Bonnie.....it just seems a bit odd. I gotta go with my gut instinct on this one.
No doubt this guy is a loser....cheater, liar, cad....I just don't think he was sly enough to have done it himself......Nothing I can put my finger on for sure, but something is not right about this.
Do you think there is something that was left out to prove his innocence? Like what? A pregnant woman killing cult? I think that the jury realized after looking at the circumstances that they were dealing with a cold killer who planned the event and who thought he was smart enough to get away with it. I think the jury did their job. It's just too bad that the jury for OJ didn't do theirs. Are these the actions of an innocent guy when you add it all up?
He went "fishing" on Christmas eve day all by his lonely. You'd think if he was innocent that he might say he was going fishing but really make tracks over to the girlfriends instead.
He was into cement-block making.
The bodies surfaced nearby where he went "fishing".
He sold his wife's car not too much later after his wife "disappeared".
He had a girlfriend on the side.
He lied to his girlfriend.
He dyed his hair, got a pile of money, and was headed for Mexico. If he was innocent as he claimed, why would he feel the need to flee?
He wouldn't(probably couldn't) speak for himself on the stand.
He never showed any real sorrow for his dead wife and baby.
The only time he showed any real emotion was when it looked like HIS neck was on the line.