Peter Singer promotes killing children as old as 5 or 6

Robert W

Don't tread on me. Be kind to our president.
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2022
Messages
33,403
Reaction score
17,083
Points
1,788
Location
Redmond Oregon, USA
We have had a professor at Princeton, U promoting the slaughter of children as old as 5 or 6. He calls them unproductive children.

Would you want to have made legal the parents right to kill children up to the age of 6?

Singer is arguing for major policy changes: people with significant cognitive disabilities and infants with any known disability should be killed when there is a benefit to the non-disabled people around them to having them removed.

The first targets of Singer's proposed policy changes are people with cognitive disabilities, perhaps the most devalued members of our community. It is time for all of us to come together in strength to oppose any threat to any one of our brothers and sisters.

It's not about academic freedom, it's about hate speech.

 
We have had a professor at Princeton, U promoting the slaughter of children as old as 5 or 6. He calls them unproductive children.

Would you want to have made legal the parents right to kill children up to the age of 6?

Singer is arguing for major policy changes: people with significant cognitive disabilities and infants with any known disability should be killed when there is a benefit to the non-disabled people around them to having them removed.

The first targets of Singer's proposed policy changes are people with cognitive disabilities, perhaps the most devalued members of our community. It is time for all of us to come together in strength to oppose any threat to any one of our brothers and sisters.

It's not about academic freedom, it's about hate speech.

lefties are gonna lefty ..
 
We have had a professor at Princeton, U promoting the slaughter of children as old as 5 or 6. He calls them unproductive children.

Would you want to have made legal the parents right to kill children up to the age of 6?

Singer is arguing for major policy changes: people with significant cognitive disabilities and infants with any known disability should be killed when there is a benefit to the non-disabled people around them to having them removed.

The first targets of Singer's proposed policy changes are people with cognitive disabilities, perhaps the most devalued members of our community. It is time for all of us to come together in strength to oppose any threat to any one of our brothers and sisters.

It's not about academic freedom, it's about hate speech.

Got anything from this century?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom