What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Perry Porn? Who Cares! These are more Legitimate Concerns...

IndependntLogic

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
2,997
Reaction score
399
Points
48
"As of this moment, this legislation is a staggering $23 billion short of
the funds needed to pay for the promised property tax cuts over the next
five years.... These are conservative estimates."**
- Texas Comptroller Carole Strayhorn, warning Gov. Rick Perry about his 2006
tax reform proposal*


IN HIS STATE OF THE STATE SPEECH in February, Rick Perry described the $27
billion budget shortfall confronting the Texas Legislature.


Now, the mainstream media and big government interest groups are doing their
best to convince us that we're facing a budget Armageddon," Perry said.
"Texans don't believe it and they shouldn't because it's not true."


The $27 billion equaled 15 percent of the $182 billion biennial budget the
Legislature had passed two years earlier. If not Armageddon, an apocalyptic
loss of revenue in a low-tax state that provides bare-bones public services.


Perry's statement was even more remarkable because most of the budget
shortfall was a consequence of a business-tax bill he pushed through the
Legislature in a special session five years earlier.


With Perry running for president on a record of fiscal responsibility (and
job creation, discussed later in this article), it's important to understand
the consequences of his 2006 "business margins tax" - and to ask if the
governor knew that the tax reform he proposed would undermine the state's
budgets in the years that followed.


First, some background. Texas is one of nine states with no income tax. It
relies on property taxes to pay for public services - notably, to pay for
public education, which consumes the lion's share of property taxes.


Because there is no income tax, property taxes are high. In 2006, Perry
called a special session to address property taxes. With no income tax,
there are no easy fixes. Yet Perry found one. A business-margins tax he said
would provide enough revenue to allow for reductions in property taxes.


It was evident at the time that the new tax would not deliver what the
governor promised. The state comptroller, Carole Strayhorn, had her staff
run the numbers on Perry's tax-reform proposal.


"In 2007," she wrote in a letter to Perry, "your plan is $3.4 billion short;
in 2009, it is $5.4 billion short; in 2010 it is $4.9 billion short, and in
2011 it is $5 billion short. These are conservative estimates."


The comptroller warned that "no economic miracle will close the gap your
plan creates. Even if every dollar of the current [2006] $8.2 billion
surplus was poured into the plan, it would not cover the plan's cost for
more than two years, 2007 and 2008. The gap is going to continue to grow
year by year." The shortfall the bill created could only be closed by tax
increases, the comptroller warned, "or massive cuts in essential public
services - like public education."


"It was not only Ms. Strayhorn's letter," Houston Democratic Rep. Scott
Hochberg told me. "Every official document predicting the state's financial
crisis at the time predicted exactly what happened."


Hochberg, the Legislature's resident authority on public-education finance,
also warned Perry that the tax bill he was promoting would not produce the
revenue he promised.


"I asked the governor about this in a small meeting amongst legislators,"
Hochberg said. "His answer to me, I remember it as clear as day, was 'Scott,
use your common sense. Don't you know that when we cut property taxes we
will see such an economic boom that you will never even notice the drop in
revenue?'"


Perry's response to the Democratic legislator was candid - and newsworthy.
Perry admitted that he knew that the tax reform he proposed would result in
a "drop in revenue."


Perry was not alone in that knowledge.


Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst told San Antonio Express-News re-porter
Garry Scharrer this past January that he, too, knew the new tax wouldn't
deliver what it promised:


"Dewhurst now says that he knew that revenue projections from the revised
business franchise tax 'were inflated' and told Senate members in
closed-door caucus meetings at the time that the business tax would not
perform as advertised 'and that we were going to create a structural funding
deficit in state government.' But Dewhurst said he also believed at the time
that 'we would grow out of it by now.'"


A state senator told me last month that Republican leaders in the Senate
knew the tax they were supporting wouldn't provide adequate revenue, and the
"grow out of it" trope was their answer to questions from skeptics.


"They knew their projections were bullshit," the senator said. "When you
questioned them about it, they'd say 'we'll grow out of it.'"


That's the story. The state's Republican governor and lieutenant governor
knowingly created a budget crisis.


As the state's comptroller predicted, a surplus covered some of the
2007-2008 budget shortfall. In 2009, Perry used $17 billion of President
Obama's federal stimulus money to fill the funding gap for the following two
years, and to cover a shortfall in the previous fiscal year's budget. (Perry
angrily refused $555 billion in stimulus money designated for the extension
of benefits to the unemployed, protesting that the federal dollars came with
strings attached.)


When the Legislature convened in January 2011, the federal stimulus money
was spent, and the budget shortfall about which the comptroller warned Perry
five years earlier had arrived.


Public education took the biggest hit.


I asked Hochberg about the $4 billion cut from the state's public education
budget.


He said the funding gap is larger: $4.3 billion on the basic "formulas,"
which have always been funded. And "a billion-plus" ($1.4 billion) in
"categorical funding" to public schools - funds for teacher incentives,
school facilities, pre-kindergarten grants.


Thus far, 12,000 teachers have been laid off. Add to that roughly 6,000
state employees cashiered because of budget cuts, a figure that doesn't
include university professors and other university employees who will lose
their jobs because of the $1.2 billion cut from higher ed funding.


Medicaid payments to doctors and hospitals were cut, and the final four
months of Medicaid payments in fiscal year 2012 were not funded.


There was an alternative to the austerity budget the Texas Legislature
passed in June. Democrats and some Republicans proposed tapping the state's
Rainy Day Fund, funded by oil and gas taxes, to cover part of the shortfall.


Perry, however, declared the $9.5 billion fund off limits. He ultimately
acquiesced to demands from moderate Republicans and agreed to use $3.2
billion to cover part of the current fiscal year's deficit. But nothing for
the next biennium, when the state's public schools are short $5.7 billion.


"The governor doesn't do anything on his own," Hochberg observed. "The
governor was only able to do that because he had a large number of House
members, particularly newly elected Tea Party House members, who were
willing to say 'I'm not going to vote against the governor.'


"But, clearly, he led the parade."


When the Legislature convenes in 2013, it will face a shortfall of $10
billion to $18 billion, plus the $4.8 billion in Medicaid expenses it failed
to fund this year.


*JOBS FOR SALE -* By now we all know what Rick Perry is selling. He
collaborates with the private sector to create jobs and to attract jobs from
other states. The Texas Enterprise Fund and the Emerging Technologies Fund,
his creations, have had unprecedented success.


It's not as simple as Perry would have you believe.


The two big economic development funds Perry controls operate on a
trickle-up economic theory. The state takes money from taxpayers and gives
it to corporations to entice them to create new jobs.


Yet corporations often fail to deliver, and the governor and his staff
rewrite corporations' contracts to relax their job-creation requirements.


Grants are often made to companies that would move into the state or expand
their workforce without a taxpayer-funded incentive.


The governor hands over millions of dollars to corporations whose executives
have contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to his campaigns.


And Rick Perry holds all the cards. The lieutenant governor and the speaker
of the House have a vote on which corporations get public money. But as a
state senator explained to me, neither of them has the staff to evaluate
candidates for taxpayer funding.


The same senator also said he would like to know how many times the speaker
and lieutenant governor have said 'no' to Perry. There is no public record.
The governor proposes and the governor disposes, in closed meetings.


And these are scarce dollars. In a low-tax and low-services state, the
zero-sum-game nature of the budgetary process is painfully evident. For
example, the biggest pot of economic-development dollars, the Texas
Enterprise Fund, was started in 2003 by drawing $285 million from the
state's Rainy Day Fund. The same Rainy Day Fund the governor this year
declared off limits for the public schools.


The Enterprise Fund also withdrew $161 million from the Unemployment
Compensation Trust Fund in 2009, at a time when unemployment taxes paid by
businesses tripled and only 34 percent of unemployed workers received
benefits.


Add to that the total funds appropriated by the Legislature, and you get
close to $500 million, all of which has or will be disbursed by the
governor.


Perry has been in office for more than 10 years, which has allowed him to
use his authority to make political appointments to expand the
constitutionally limited powers of his office. He is, in other words, a very
strong weak governor.


Every statewide elected office is held by a Republican. And the Republican
Party holds a supermajority in both houses of the Legislature.


This political hegemony has created a climate that discourages oversight of
the Republican governor.


*PUBLIC INTEREST OVERSIGHT -* In the absence of official oversight, a
good-government group, Texans for Public Justice (TPJ)<http://info.tpj.org/reports/pdf/perryprimer.fin.pdf>,
did its own audit of the economic development funds and found that in 2009
the number of corporate grant recipients not fulfilling their obligations
had increased from 42 percent to 66 percent.


TPJ also found that when companies failed to meet their contractual
obligations to provide jobs, the governor's office discreetly rewrote their
contracts.


No state official, appointed or elected, it seemed, was working to ensure
that the taxpayer was getting a reasonable return on the $368 billion the
governor had handed out at the time TPJ's report was released.


Beyond the sloppy stewardship of taxpayer dollars, many of Perry's grants
make little sense.


Consider $600,000 paid to the Cabela's sporting-goods chain for a commitment
of 400 new jobs in two new superstores. And the promise of "new hotels,
entertainment parks, restaurants and complementary retail stores … expected
to total over $250 million and create an additional 2,000 Texas jobs,"
according to documents obtained by TPJ.


Cabela's is not Disney. It created 241 jobs, with average annual salaries of
$23,000. The hotels, restaurants, and various retail outlets never
materialized. The state recovered $177,288, or 44 percent of the grant.


"It's a slippery slope when you fund retail," said Don Baylor, a policy
analyst at the non-profit Center for Public Policy Priorities. "Because
retail always follows where rooftops are." In other words, where there are
consumers, Cabela's and other retailers need no incentive.


Other grants were made to corporations expanding facilities they are
unlikely to abandon.


Motiva Enterprises, for example, is a joint venture of Shell Oil and the
Saudi-Arabian oil company Aramco. In 2006, Texas awarded Motiva $2 million
on the promise of 300 jobs it would create through a $3.2 billion project to
make its Port Arthur refinery the largest in the nation.


With a producing refinery on Port Arthur's Sabine-Neches Waterway, Motiva
was unlikely to take its $3.2 billion expansion project to another state.


Nor was Motiva so illiquid that it could not have expanded its refinery
without $2 million from the public treasury. In the quarter in which
Motiva's $2 million check was cut, Shell reported $6.3 billion in earnings.


Taxpayers in Texas also wrote checks to mortgage bankers, while the bankers
booked huge profits on the subprime home-loans that foundered the economy in
2007.


Countrywide Home Loans got $20 million in 2004, on a commitment of 7,500
jobs. It created 3,876. Then the bottom fell out of the housing market,
Countrywide was charged with defrauding its clients, and was acquired by
Bank of America. It has agreed to return 40 percent of its $20 million. By
July 2011, the Countrywide loan portfolio, underwritten in part by Texas
taxpayers, had cost Bank of America more than 50 percent of its share value.


Texas taxpayers also gave Washington Mutual $15 million in 2005, to open a
new $50 million facility in San Antonio. At the time the deal was announced,
WaMu had $300 billion in assets, $188 billion in deposits, and 43,000
employees. It was also in the process of dumping its 30-year-fixed-rate
mortgage portfolio to clear the books for high-risk subprime loans.


"Those were really negative investments," Baylor said. "You financed toxic
financial products that sucked equity and wealth out of hundreds of
thousands of people, not only in Texas, but nationwide."


WaMu also consistently missed its job targets. TPJ found that the governor's
office amended its contract, allowing aggregated part-time jobs to count as
full-time jobs.


Other grants fail to pass the smell test.


Bill White, Perry's opponent in the 2010 general election, criticized an
$8.5 million grant to Caterpillar Inc. to build an engine plant in Seguin.
Perry's office responded that White was desperate because he was trailing in
the polls.


Perhaps.


But Peter M. Holt owns the Caterpillar sales outlets in Texas and had
donated $424,000 to Perry's campaigns. The decision to locate the plant in
Texas, according to a company press release obtained by White, was made
before Caterpillar's grant was awarded.


Sanderson Farms got $500,000 in exchange for a commitment to build a $7
million chicken hatchery and processing plant in Waco. Sanderson Farms CEO
Joe Sanderson had contributed $165,000 to Perry's campaign.


Close ties between political donors and development grants are not isolated
incidents. Texas Observer<http://www.texasobserver.org/cover-story/slush-fun>Editor Dave Mann found that executives and employees of 20 companies that
received a combined $174.2 million had donated $2.2 million to Perry, and to
the Republican Governors Association he chaired until he began his run for
the presidency.


In the 2011 legislative session, Democratic Senator Kirk Watson and
Republican Senator John Carona passed a bill that provides some transparency
in the grant process. Control of the funds remains firmly in Perry's hands.


Don't look for the pace of the grants to slow. A week before Perry flew to
South Carolina to announce that he's in the race, his office announced a
$300,000 grant to Office Depot.


The company might need the help. Two days before winning the scratch-off
lottery in Texas, Office Depot posted a quarterly loss of $29 million.
 

Google

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2011
Messages
2,979
Reaction score
499
Points
130
"As of this moment, this legislation is a staggering $23 billion short of
the funds needed to pay for the promised property tax cuts over the next
five years.... These are conservative estimates."**
- Texas Comptroller Carole Strayhorn, warning Gov. Rick Perry about his 2006
tax reform proposal*


IN HIS STATE OF THE STATE SPEECH in February, Rick Perry described the $27
billion budget shortfall confronting the Texas Legislature.


Now, the mainstream media and big government interest groups are doing their
best to convince us that we're facing a budget Armageddon," Perry said.
"Texans don't believe it and they shouldn't because it's not true."


The $27 billion equaled 15 percent of the $182 billion biennial budget the
Legislature had passed two years earlier. If not Armageddon, an apocalyptic
loss of revenue in a low-tax state that provides bare-bones public services.


Perry's statement was even more remarkable because most of the budget
shortfall was a consequence of a business-tax bill he pushed through the
Legislature in a special session five years earlier.


With Perry running for president on a record of fiscal responsibility (and
job creation, discussed later in this article), it's important to understand
the consequences of his 2006 "business margins tax" - and to ask if the
governor knew that the tax reform he proposed would undermine the state's
budgets in the years that followed.


First, some background. Texas is one of nine states with no income tax. It
relies on property taxes to pay for public services - notably, to pay for
public education, which consumes the lion's share of property taxes.


Because there is no income tax, property taxes are high. In 2006, Perry
called a special session to address property taxes. With no income tax,
there are no easy fixes. Yet Perry found one. A business-margins tax he said
would provide enough revenue to allow for reductions in property taxes.


It was evident at the time that the new tax would not deliver what the
governor promised. The state comptroller, Carole Strayhorn, had her staff
run the numbers on Perry's tax-reform proposal.


"In 2007," she wrote in a letter to Perry, "your plan is $3.4 billion short;
in 2009, it is $5.4 billion short; in 2010 it is $4.9 billion short, and in
2011 it is $5 billion short. These are conservative estimates."


The comptroller warned that "no economic miracle will close the gap your
plan creates. Even if every dollar of the current [2006] $8.2 billion
surplus was poured into the plan, it would not cover the plan's cost for
more than two years, 2007 and 2008. The gap is going to continue to grow
year by year." The shortfall the bill created could only be closed by tax
increases, the comptroller warned, "or massive cuts in essential public
services - like public education."


"It was not only Ms. Strayhorn's letter," Houston Democratic Rep. Scott
Hochberg told me. "Every official document predicting the state's financial
crisis at the time predicted exactly what happened."


Hochberg, the Legislature's resident authority on public-education finance,
also warned Perry that the tax bill he was promoting would not produce the
revenue he promised.


"I asked the governor about this in a small meeting amongst legislators,"
Hochberg said. "His answer to me, I remember it as clear as day, was 'Scott,
use your common sense. Don't you know that when we cut property taxes we
will see such an economic boom that you will never even notice the drop in
revenue?'"


Perry's response to the Democratic legislator was candid - and newsworthy.
Perry admitted that he knew that the tax reform he proposed would result in
a "drop in revenue."


Perry was not alone in that knowledge.


Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst told San Antonio Express-News re-porter
Garry Scharrer this past January that he, too, knew the new tax wouldn't
deliver what it promised:


"Dewhurst now says that he knew that revenue projections from the revised
business franchise tax 'were inflated' and told Senate members in
closed-door caucus meetings at the time that the business tax would not
perform as advertised 'and that we were going to create a structural funding
deficit in state government.' But Dewhurst said he also believed at the time
that 'we would grow out of it by now.'"


A state senator told me last month that Republican leaders in the Senate
knew the tax they were supporting wouldn't provide adequate revenue, and the
"grow out of it" trope was their answer to questions from skeptics.


"They knew their projections were bullshit," the senator said. "When you
questioned them about it, they'd say 'we'll grow out of it.'"


That's the story. The state's Republican governor and lieutenant governor
knowingly created a budget crisis.


As the state's comptroller predicted, a surplus covered some of the
2007-2008 budget shortfall. In 2009, Perry used $17 billion of President
Obama's federal stimulus money to fill the funding gap for the following two
years, and to cover a shortfall in the previous fiscal year's budget. (Perry
angrily refused $555 billion in stimulus money designated for the extension
of benefits to the unemployed, protesting that the federal dollars came with
strings attached.)


When the Legislature convened in January 2011, the federal stimulus money
was spent, and the budget shortfall about which the comptroller warned Perry
five years earlier had arrived.


Public education took the biggest hit.


I asked Hochberg about the $4 billion cut from the state's public education
budget.


He said the funding gap is larger: $4.3 billion on the basic "formulas,"
which have always been funded. And "a billion-plus" ($1.4 billion) in
"categorical funding" to public schools - funds for teacher incentives,
school facilities, pre-kindergarten grants.


Thus far, 12,000 teachers have been laid off. Add to that roughly 6,000
state employees cashiered because of budget cuts, a figure that doesn't
include university professors and other university employees who will lose
their jobs because of the $1.2 billion cut from higher ed funding.


Medicaid payments to doctors and hospitals were cut, and the final four
months of Medicaid payments in fiscal year 2012 were not funded.


There was an alternative to the austerity budget the Texas Legislature
passed in June. Democrats and some Republicans proposed tapping the state's
Rainy Day Fund, funded by oil and gas taxes, to cover part of the shortfall.


Perry, however, declared the $9.5 billion fund off limits. He ultimately
acquiesced to demands from moderate Republicans and agreed to use $3.2
billion to cover part of the current fiscal year's deficit. But nothing for
the next biennium, when the state's public schools are short $5.7 billion.


"The governor doesn't do anything on his own," Hochberg observed. "The
governor was only able to do that because he had a large number of House
members, particularly newly elected Tea Party House members, who were
willing to say 'I'm not going to vote against the governor.'


"But, clearly, he led the parade."


When the Legislature convenes in 2013, it will face a shortfall of $10
billion to $18 billion, plus the $4.8 billion in Medicaid expenses it failed
to fund this year.


*JOBS FOR SALE -* By now we all know what Rick Perry is selling. He
collaborates with the private sector to create jobs and to attract jobs from
other states. The Texas Enterprise Fund and the Emerging Technologies Fund,
his creations, have had unprecedented success.


It's not as simple as Perry would have you believe.


The two big economic development funds Perry controls operate on a
trickle-up economic theory. The state takes money from taxpayers and gives
it to corporations to entice them to create new jobs.


Yet corporations often fail to deliver, and the governor and his staff
rewrite corporations' contracts to relax their job-creation requirements.


Grants are often made to companies that would move into the state or expand
their workforce without a taxpayer-funded incentive.


The governor hands over millions of dollars to corporations whose executives
have contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to his campaigns.


And Rick Perry holds all the cards. The lieutenant governor and the speaker
of the House have a vote on which corporations get public money. But as a
state senator explained to me, neither of them has the staff to evaluate
candidates for taxpayer funding.


The same senator also said he would like to know how many times the speaker
and lieutenant governor have said 'no' to Perry. There is no public record.
The governor proposes and the governor disposes, in closed meetings.


And these are scarce dollars. In a low-tax and low-services state, the
zero-sum-game nature of the budgetary process is painfully evident. For
example, the biggest pot of economic-development dollars, the Texas
Enterprise Fund, was started in 2003 by drawing $285 million from the
state's Rainy Day Fund. The same Rainy Day Fund the governor this year
declared off limits for the public schools.


The Enterprise Fund also withdrew $161 million from the Unemployment
Compensation Trust Fund in 2009, at a time when unemployment taxes paid by
businesses tripled and only 34 percent of unemployed workers received
benefits.


Add to that the total funds appropriated by the Legislature, and you get
close to $500 million, all of which has or will be disbursed by the
governor.


Perry has been in office for more than 10 years, which has allowed him to
use his authority to make political appointments to expand the
constitutionally limited powers of his office. He is, in other words, a very
strong weak governor.


Every statewide elected office is held by a Republican. And the Republican
Party holds a supermajority in both houses of the Legislature.


This political hegemony has created a climate that discourages oversight of
the Republican governor.


*PUBLIC INTEREST OVERSIGHT -* In the absence of official oversight, a
good-government group, Texans for Public Justice (TPJ)<http://info.tpj.org/reports/pdf/perryprimer.fin.pdf>,
did its own audit of the economic development funds and found that in 2009
the number of corporate grant recipients not fulfilling their obligations
had increased from 42 percent to 66 percent.


TPJ also found that when companies failed to meet their contractual
obligations to provide jobs, the governor's office discreetly rewrote their
contracts.


No state official, appointed or elected, it seemed, was working to ensure
that the taxpayer was getting a reasonable return on the $368 billion the
governor had handed out at the time TPJ's report was released.


Beyond the sloppy stewardship of taxpayer dollars, many of Perry's grants
make little sense.


Consider $600,000 paid to the Cabela's sporting-goods chain for a commitment
of 400 new jobs in two new superstores. And the promise of "new hotels,
entertainment parks, restaurants and complementary retail stores … expected
to total over $250 million and create an additional 2,000 Texas jobs,"
according to documents obtained by TPJ.


Cabela's is not Disney. It created 241 jobs, with average annual salaries of
$23,000. The hotels, restaurants, and various retail outlets never
materialized. The state recovered $177,288, or 44 percent of the grant.


"It's a slippery slope when you fund retail," said Don Baylor, a policy
analyst at the non-profit Center for Public Policy Priorities. "Because
retail always follows where rooftops are." In other words, where there are
consumers, Cabela's and other retailers need no incentive.


Other grants were made to corporations expanding facilities they are
unlikely to abandon.


Motiva Enterprises, for example, is a joint venture of Shell Oil and the
Saudi-Arabian oil company Aramco. In 2006, Texas awarded Motiva $2 million
on the promise of 300 jobs it would create through a $3.2 billion project to
make its Port Arthur refinery the largest in the nation.


With a producing refinery on Port Arthur's Sabine-Neches Waterway, Motiva
was unlikely to take its $3.2 billion expansion project to another state.


Nor was Motiva so illiquid that it could not have expanded its refinery
without $2 million from the public treasury. In the quarter in which
Motiva's $2 million check was cut, Shell reported $6.3 billion in earnings.


Taxpayers in Texas also wrote checks to mortgage bankers, while the bankers
booked huge profits on the subprime home-loans that foundered the economy in
2007.


Countrywide Home Loans got $20 million in 2004, on a commitment of 7,500
jobs. It created 3,876. Then the bottom fell out of the housing market,
Countrywide was charged with defrauding its clients, and was acquired by
Bank of America. It has agreed to return 40 percent of its $20 million. By
July 2011, the Countrywide loan portfolio, underwritten in part by Texas
taxpayers, had cost Bank of America more than 50 percent of its share value.


Texas taxpayers also gave Washington Mutual $15 million in 2005, to open a
new $50 million facility in San Antonio. At the time the deal was announced,
WaMu had $300 billion in assets, $188 billion in deposits, and 43,000
employees. It was also in the process of dumping its 30-year-fixed-rate
mortgage portfolio to clear the books for high-risk subprime loans.


"Those were really negative investments," Baylor said. "You financed toxic
financial products that sucked equity and wealth out of hundreds of
thousands of people, not only in Texas, but nationwide."


WaMu also consistently missed its job targets. TPJ found that the governor's
office amended its contract, allowing aggregated part-time jobs to count as
full-time jobs.


Other grants fail to pass the smell test.


Bill White, Perry's opponent in the 2010 general election, criticized an
$8.5 million grant to Caterpillar Inc. to build an engine plant in Seguin.
Perry's office responded that White was desperate because he was trailing in
the polls.


Perhaps.


But Peter M. Holt owns the Caterpillar sales outlets in Texas and had
donated $424,000 to Perry's campaigns. The decision to locate the plant in
Texas, according to a company press release obtained by White, was made
before Caterpillar's grant was awarded.


Sanderson Farms got $500,000 in exchange for a commitment to build a $7
million chicken hatchery and processing plant in Waco. Sanderson Farms CEO
Joe Sanderson had contributed $165,000 to Perry's campaign.


Close ties between political donors and development grants are not isolated
incidents. Texas Observer<http://www.texasobserver.org/cover-story/slush-fun>Editor Dave Mann found that executives and employees of 20 companies that
received a combined $174.2 million had donated $2.2 million to Perry, and to
the Republican Governors Association he chaired until he began his run for
the presidency.


In the 2011 legislative session, Democratic Senator Kirk Watson and
Republican Senator John Carona passed a bill that provides some transparency
in the grant process. Control of the funds remains firmly in Perry's hands.


Don't look for the pace of the grants to slow. A week before Perry flew to
South Carolina to announce that he's in the race, his office announced a
$300,000 grant to Office Depot.


The company might need the help. Two days before winning the scratch-off
lottery in Texas, Office Depot posted a quarterly loss of $29 million.

I simply love how liberals like yourself, despite your moderate name and signature quotes, are so concerned about deficits and debt when describing Perry.

If these things are truly of concern to you, you must really be concerned and dismayed at the policies of the Obama administration.
 

iamwhatiseem

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2010
Messages
27,915
Reaction score
10,435
Points
900
Location
On a hill
Exactly...Kennedy was a whore, Clinton chased more tail than a winter wolf...Harding had as many prostitutes as he had socks.
Our country is falling apart at the seams...who gives a flying doughnut if he liked porn
 

McDowell's

Rookie
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
883
Reaction score
239
Points
0
"As of this moment, this legislation is a staggering $23 billion short of
the funds needed to pay for the promised property tax cuts over the next
five years.... These are conservative estimates."**
- Texas Comptroller Carole Strayhorn, warning Gov. Rick Perry about his 2006
tax reform proposal*


IN HIS STATE OF THE STATE SPEECH in February, Rick Perry described the $27
billion budget shortfall confronting the Texas Legislature.


Now, the mainstream media and big government interest groups are doing their
best to convince us that we're facing a budget Armageddon," Perry said.
"Texans don't believe it and they shouldn't because it's not true."


The $27 billion equaled 15 percent of the $182 billion biennial budget the
Legislature had passed two years earlier. If not Armageddon, an apocalyptic
loss of revenue in a low-tax state that provides bare-bones public services.


Perry's statement was even more remarkable because most of the budget
shortfall was a consequence of a business-tax bill he pushed through the
Legislature in a special session five years earlier.


With Perry running for president on a record of fiscal responsibility (and
job creation, discussed later in this article), it's important to understand
the consequences of his 2006 "business margins tax" - and to ask if the
governor knew that the tax reform he proposed would undermine the state's
budgets in the years that followed.


First, some background. Texas is one of nine states with no income tax. It
relies on property taxes to pay for public services - notably, to pay for
public education, which consumes the lion's share of property taxes.


Because there is no income tax, property taxes are high. In 2006, Perry
called a special session to address property taxes. With no income tax,
there are no easy fixes. Yet Perry found one. A business-margins tax he said
would provide enough revenue to allow for reductions in property taxes.


It was evident at the time that the new tax would not deliver what the
governor promised. The state comptroller, Carole Strayhorn, had her staff
run the numbers on Perry's tax-reform proposal.


"In 2007," she wrote in a letter to Perry, "your plan is $3.4 billion short;
in 2009, it is $5.4 billion short; in 2010 it is $4.9 billion short, and in
2011 it is $5 billion short. These are conservative estimates."


The comptroller warned that "no economic miracle will close the gap your
plan creates. Even if every dollar of the current [2006] $8.2 billion
surplus was poured into the plan, it would not cover the plan's cost for
more than two years, 2007 and 2008. The gap is going to continue to grow
year by year." The shortfall the bill created could only be closed by tax
increases, the comptroller warned, "or massive cuts in essential public
services - like public education."


"It was not only Ms. Strayhorn's letter," Houston Democratic Rep. Scott
Hochberg told me. "Every official document predicting the state's financial
crisis at the time predicted exactly what happened."


Hochberg, the Legislature's resident authority on public-education finance,
also warned Perry that the tax bill he was promoting would not produce the
revenue he promised.


"I asked the governor about this in a small meeting amongst legislators,"
Hochberg said. "His answer to me, I remember it as clear as day, was 'Scott,
use your common sense. Don't you know that when we cut property taxes we
will see such an economic boom that you will never even notice the drop in
revenue?'"


Perry's response to the Democratic legislator was candid - and newsworthy.
Perry admitted that he knew that the tax reform he proposed would result in
a "drop in revenue."


Perry was not alone in that knowledge.


Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst told San Antonio Express-News re-porter
Garry Scharrer this past January that he, too, knew the new tax wouldn't
deliver what it promised:


"Dewhurst now says that he knew that revenue projections from the revised
business franchise tax 'were inflated' and told Senate members in
closed-door caucus meetings at the time that the business tax would not
perform as advertised 'and that we were going to create a structural funding
deficit in state government.' But Dewhurst said he also believed at the time
that 'we would grow out of it by now.'"


A state senator told me last month that Republican leaders in the Senate
knew the tax they were supporting wouldn't provide adequate revenue, and the
"grow out of it" trope was their answer to questions from skeptics.


"They knew their projections were bullshit," the senator said. "When you
questioned them about it, they'd say 'we'll grow out of it.'"


That's the story. The state's Republican governor and lieutenant governor
knowingly created a budget crisis.


As the state's comptroller predicted, a surplus covered some of the
2007-2008 budget shortfall. In 2009, Perry used $17 billion of President
Obama's federal stimulus money to fill the funding gap for the following two
years, and to cover a shortfall in the previous fiscal year's budget. (Perry
angrily refused $555 billion in stimulus money designated for the extension
of benefits to the unemployed, protesting that the federal dollars came with
strings attached.)


When the Legislature convened in January 2011, the federal stimulus money
was spent, and the budget shortfall about which the comptroller warned Perry
five years earlier had arrived.


Public education took the biggest hit.


I asked Hochberg about the $4 billion cut from the state's public education
budget.


He said the funding gap is larger: $4.3 billion on the basic "formulas,"
which have always been funded. And "a billion-plus" ($1.4 billion) in
"categorical funding" to public schools - funds for teacher incentives,
school facilities, pre-kindergarten grants.


Thus far, 12,000 teachers have been laid off. Add to that roughly 6,000
state employees cashiered because of budget cuts, a figure that doesn't
include university professors and other university employees who will lose
their jobs because of the $1.2 billion cut from higher ed funding.


Medicaid payments to doctors and hospitals were cut, and the final four
months of Medicaid payments in fiscal year 2012 were not funded.


There was an alternative to the austerity budget the Texas Legislature
passed in June. Democrats and some Republicans proposed tapping the state's
Rainy Day Fund, funded by oil and gas taxes, to cover part of the shortfall.


Perry, however, declared the $9.5 billion fund off limits. He ultimately
acquiesced to demands from moderate Republicans and agreed to use $3.2
billion to cover part of the current fiscal year's deficit. But nothing for
the next biennium, when the state's public schools are short $5.7 billion.


"The governor doesn't do anything on his own," Hochberg observed. "The
governor was only able to do that because he had a large number of House
members, particularly newly elected Tea Party House members, who were
willing to say 'I'm not going to vote against the governor.'


"But, clearly, he led the parade."


When the Legislature convenes in 2013, it will face a shortfall of $10
billion to $18 billion, plus the $4.8 billion in Medicaid expenses it failed
to fund this year.


*JOBS FOR SALE -* By now we all know what Rick Perry is selling. He
collaborates with the private sector to create jobs and to attract jobs from
other states. The Texas Enterprise Fund and the Emerging Technologies Fund,
his creations, have had unprecedented success.


It's not as simple as Perry would have you believe.


The two big economic development funds Perry controls operate on a
trickle-up economic theory. The state takes money from taxpayers and gives
it to corporations to entice them to create new jobs.


Yet corporations often fail to deliver, and the governor and his staff
rewrite corporations' contracts to relax their job-creation requirements.


Grants are often made to companies that would move into the state or expand
their workforce without a taxpayer-funded incentive.


The governor hands over millions of dollars to corporations whose executives
have contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to his campaigns.


And Rick Perry holds all the cards. The lieutenant governor and the speaker
of the House have a vote on which corporations get public money. But as a
state senator explained to me, neither of them has the staff to evaluate
candidates for taxpayer funding.


The same senator also said he would like to know how many times the speaker
and lieutenant governor have said 'no' to Perry. There is no public record.
The governor proposes and the governor disposes, in closed meetings.


And these are scarce dollars. In a low-tax and low-services state, the
zero-sum-game nature of the budgetary process is painfully evident. For
example, the biggest pot of economic-development dollars, the Texas
Enterprise Fund, was started in 2003 by drawing $285 million from the
state's Rainy Day Fund. The same Rainy Day Fund the governor this year
declared off limits for the public schools.


The Enterprise Fund also withdrew $161 million from the Unemployment
Compensation Trust Fund in 2009, at a time when unemployment taxes paid by
businesses tripled and only 34 percent of unemployed workers received
benefits.


Add to that the total funds appropriated by the Legislature, and you get
close to $500 million, all of which has or will be disbursed by the
governor.


Perry has been in office for more than 10 years, which has allowed him to
use his authority to make political appointments to expand the
constitutionally limited powers of his office. He is, in other words, a very
strong weak governor.


Every statewide elected office is held by a Republican. And the Republican
Party holds a supermajority in both houses of the Legislature.


This political hegemony has created a climate that discourages oversight of
the Republican governor.


*PUBLIC INTEREST OVERSIGHT -* In the absence of official oversight, a
good-government group, Texans for Public Justice (TPJ)<http://info.tpj.org/reports/pdf/perryprimer.fin.pdf>,
did its own audit of the economic development funds and found that in 2009
the number of corporate grant recipients not fulfilling their obligations
had increased from 42 percent to 66 percent.


TPJ also found that when companies failed to meet their contractual
obligations to provide jobs, the governor's office discreetly rewrote their
contracts.


No state official, appointed or elected, it seemed, was working to ensure
that the taxpayer was getting a reasonable return on the $368 billion the
governor had handed out at the time TPJ's report was released.


Beyond the sloppy stewardship of taxpayer dollars, many of Perry's grants
make little sense.


Consider $600,000 paid to the Cabela's sporting-goods chain for a commitment
of 400 new jobs in two new superstores. And the promise of "new hotels,
entertainment parks, restaurants and complementary retail stores … expected
to total over $250 million and create an additional 2,000 Texas jobs,"
according to documents obtained by TPJ.


Cabela's is not Disney. It created 241 jobs, with average annual salaries of
$23,000. The hotels, restaurants, and various retail outlets never
materialized. The state recovered $177,288, or 44 percent of the grant.


"It's a slippery slope when you fund retail," said Don Baylor, a policy
analyst at the non-profit Center for Public Policy Priorities. "Because
retail always follows where rooftops are." In other words, where there are
consumers, Cabela's and other retailers need no incentive.


Other grants were made to corporations expanding facilities they are
unlikely to abandon.


Motiva Enterprises, for example, is a joint venture of Shell Oil and the
Saudi-Arabian oil company Aramco. In 2006, Texas awarded Motiva $2 million
on the promise of 300 jobs it would create through a $3.2 billion project to
make its Port Arthur refinery the largest in the nation.


With a producing refinery on Port Arthur's Sabine-Neches Waterway, Motiva
was unlikely to take its $3.2 billion expansion project to another state.


Nor was Motiva so illiquid that it could not have expanded its refinery
without $2 million from the public treasury. In the quarter in which
Motiva's $2 million check was cut, Shell reported $6.3 billion in earnings.


Taxpayers in Texas also wrote checks to mortgage bankers, while the bankers
booked huge profits on the subprime home-loans that foundered the economy in
2007.


Countrywide Home Loans got $20 million in 2004, on a commitment of 7,500
jobs. It created 3,876. Then the bottom fell out of the housing market,
Countrywide was charged with defrauding its clients, and was acquired by
Bank of America. It has agreed to return 40 percent of its $20 million. By
July 2011, the Countrywide loan portfolio, underwritten in part by Texas
taxpayers, had cost Bank of America more than 50 percent of its share value.


Texas taxpayers also gave Washington Mutual $15 million in 2005, to open a
new $50 million facility in San Antonio. At the time the deal was announced,
WaMu had $300 billion in assets, $188 billion in deposits, and 43,000
employees. It was also in the process of dumping its 30-year-fixed-rate
mortgage portfolio to clear the books for high-risk subprime loans.


"Those were really negative investments," Baylor said. "You financed toxic
financial products that sucked equity and wealth out of hundreds of
thousands of people, not only in Texas, but nationwide."


WaMu also consistently missed its job targets. TPJ found that the governor's
office amended its contract, allowing aggregated part-time jobs to count as
full-time jobs.


Other grants fail to pass the smell test.


Bill White, Perry's opponent in the 2010 general election, criticized an
$8.5 million grant to Caterpillar Inc. to build an engine plant in Seguin.
Perry's office responded that White was desperate because he was trailing in
the polls.


Perhaps.


But Peter M. Holt owns the Caterpillar sales outlets in Texas and had
donated $424,000 to Perry's campaigns. The decision to locate the plant in
Texas, according to a company press release obtained by White, was made
before Caterpillar's grant was awarded.


Sanderson Farms got $500,000 in exchange for a commitment to build a $7
million chicken hatchery and processing plant in Waco. Sanderson Farms CEO
Joe Sanderson had contributed $165,000 to Perry's campaign.


Close ties between political donors and development grants are not isolated
incidents. Texas Observer<http://www.texasobserver.org/cover-story/slush-fun>Editor Dave Mann found that executives and employees of 20 companies that
received a combined $174.2 million had donated $2.2 million to Perry, and to
the Republican Governors Association he chaired until he began his run for
the presidency.


In the 2011 legislative session, Democratic Senator Kirk Watson and
Republican Senator John Carona passed a bill that provides some transparency
in the grant process. Control of the funds remains firmly in Perry's hands.


Don't look for the pace of the grants to slow. A week before Perry flew to
South Carolina to announce that he's in the race, his office announced a
$300,000 grant to Office Depot.


The company might need the help. Two days before winning the scratch-off
lottery in Texas, Office Depot posted a quarterly loss of $29 million.

quoted for brevity
 

Google

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2011
Messages
2,979
Reaction score
499
Points
130
Copy and paste.....you should consider changing your name to DependentLogic!!!!! LOL
 
OP
IndependntLogic

IndependntLogic

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
2,997
Reaction score
399
Points
48

I simply love how liberals like yourself, despite your moderate name and signature quotes, are so concerned about deficits and debt when describing Perry.

If these things are truly of concern to you, you must really be concerned and dismayed at the policies of the Obama administration.

Um yeah. See my signature for your post here and I would imagine, elsewhere.

Ya see, unlike those who stare at the spinning circle and see only what their party tells them to, I can point out dozens of threads where I have indeed, harshly criticized Obama's policies, lack of leadership, the debacle of ObamaCare, non-existence of any Dem budget etc...
But of course, the weak whackjob types must do what, when anyone disagrees with them on anything? Address the points or facts in the OP? Of course not! See signature for your reply to this. SO predictible.... So please continue the entertainment! Keep proving me right! Dodge, Label, Insult, Change the Subject, Cut & Run but don't you try to address those darn facts and issues head on sweetheart!
 
Last edited:

Sallow

The Big Bad Wolf.
Joined
Oct 4, 2010
Messages
56,532
Reaction score
6,243
Points
1,840
Location
New York City
I simply love how liberals like yourself, despite your moderate name and signature quotes, are so concerned about deficits and debt when describing Perry.

If these things are truly of concern to you, you must really be concerned and dismayed at the policies of the Obama administration.

And we liberals find in amazingly interesting that the 2 biggest spending Presidents, Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush got a "Deficits don't matter" mantra from conservatives when they were spending like crazy.

:lol:
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$280.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top