Pentagon released a new AI military chatbot and it immediately pointed out that Pete Hegseth is a war criminal.

Pretty hilarious if you ask me, since none of the republican politicians or media personalities can figure it out!

Maybe AI ain't so bad after all?

Nah, it still sucks, it's just that in this particular case it showed an unbiased opinion on something republicans would rather it didn't.

Apparently shortly after it went live someone asked this:

View attachment 1193212


Ok, let's talk about war crimes.

During The presidency of Barack Obama (2009–2017), critics including human rights organizations, legal scholars, and journalists have alleged that certain U.S. military actions under his command—particularly the expanded use of drone strikes—violated international humanitarian law and could constitute war crimes.

Key allegations focus on the following areas, based on reports and analyses:
  • Drone Strike Program Expansion: Obama authorized 563 targeted strikes (mostly drones) in Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen, resulting in an estimated 2,372–2,581 total deaths, including 384–807 civilians per independent tallies (U.S. government estimates were lower at 64–116 civilians from 2009–2015). This was about ten times more strikes than under George W. Bush in those regions. Critics argue some strikes violated principles of distinction (failing to separate combatants from civilians) and proportionality (causing excessive civilian harm relative to military gain), potentially amounting to willful killing under the Geneva Conventions.
  • Double-Tap Strikes: A tactic involving an initial strike followed by secondary strikes on the same site shortly after, often hitting first responders, civilians, or the wounded. Examples include a May 2009 strike in Pakistan's Khaisor village and an October 2012 strike killing a 68-year-old woman (Mamana Bibi) in North Waziristan. Legal analyses claim these breach Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions by targeting protected persons (e.g., the injured or aid workers) and could qualify as grave breaches prosecutable as war crimes under U.S. law like the War Crimes Act of 1996.
  • Specific Incidents with High Civilian Casualties:
    • A 2009 funeral strike in Pakistan killing up to 41 civilians.
    • A 2009 Yemen strike killing 55 people, including 21 children and 12 women (five pregnant).
    • Overall, 128 strikes in Pakistan in 2010 alone, with at least 89 civilian deaths reported.
    • Broader bombing campaigns, such as 26,171 bombs dropped in 2016 across seven countries, contributing to an average of 582 civilian deaths per year from U.S. operations (2007–2016).
  • Other Contexts: Allegations extend to U.S. support for Saudi-led operations in Yemen (potentially enabling unlawful strikes) and targeted killings of U.S. citizens like Anwar al-Awlaki without trial, which the ACLU challenged as unconstitutional. Some also criticize lack of transparency and accountability, impeding full investigations.
 
Ok, let's talk about war crimes.

During The presidency of Barack Obama (2009–2017), critics including human rights organizations, legal scholars, and journalists have alleged that certain U.S. military actions under his command—particularly the expanded use of drone strikes—violated international humanitarian law and could constitute war crimes.

Key allegations focus on the following areas, based on reports and analyses:
  • Drone Strike Program Expansion: Obama authorized 563 targeted strikes (mostly drones) in Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen, resulting in an estimated 2,372–2,581 total deaths, including 384–807 civilians per independent tallies (U.S. government estimates were lower at 64–116 civilians from 2009–2015). This was about ten times more strikes than under George W. Bush in those regions. Critics argue some strikes violated principles of distinction (failing to separate combatants from civilians) and proportionality (causing excessive civilian harm relative to military gain), potentially amounting to willful killing under the Geneva Conventions.
  • Double-Tap Strikes: A tactic involving an initial strike followed by secondary strikes on the same site shortly after, often hitting first responders, civilians, or the wounded. Examples include a May 2009 strike in Pakistan's Khaisor village and an October 2012 strike killing a 68-year-old woman (Mamana Bibi) in North Waziristan. Legal analyses claim these breach Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions by targeting protected persons (e.g., the injured or aid workers) and could qualify as grave breaches prosecutable as war crimes under U.S. law like the War Crimes Act of 1996.
  • Specific Incidents with High Civilian Casualties:
    • A 2009 funeral strike in Pakistan killing up to 41 civilians.
    • A 2009 Yemen strike killing 55 people, including 21 children and 12 women (five pregnant).
    • Overall, 128 strikes in Pakistan in 2010 alone, with at least 89 civilian deaths reported.
    • Broader bombing campaigns, such as 26,171 bombs dropped in 2016 across seven countries, contributing to an average of 582 civilian deaths per year from U.S. operations (2007–2016).
  • Other Contexts: Allegations extend to U.S. support for Saudi-led operations in Yemen (potentially enabling unlawful strikes) and targeted killings of U.S. citizens like Anwar al-Awlaki without trial, which the ACLU challenged as unconstitutional. Some also criticize lack of transparency and accountability, impeding full investigations.
Oh look, a deflection.

What a surprise.
 
Your lack of self awareness is astounding.
96929207_170560ab12.webp
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom