Pelosi and Democrats Ready to Overthrow a Constitutionally Elected Prez

[Bush92]

What a bunch of shit! Complete joke.
Pelosi expected to announce formal impeachment inquiry against Trump at 5 pm ET

 

[occupied]

Next time elect someone who isn't a criminal.

 

[Bush92]

Next time elect someone who isn't a criminal.

We did...Hillary lost.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

I hope it drags out. I want to hear what Democrat can scream the loudest.

 

[basquebromance]

Steele's Manafort info wasnt of much use to Weissman and Mueller since it was salacious, unverified, and easily disproved.

chew on that!

 

[Dick Foster]

What a bunch of shit! Complete joke.
Pelosi expected to announce formal impeachment inquiry against Trump at 5 pm ET

Nothing to get your bowels in an up roar over. It ain't nothing but another circle jerk to make their drooling followers think they're doing something for a change when they're doing nothing and going nowhere but out in 2020.

 

[Blaine Sweeter]

What a bunch of shit! Complete joke.
Pelosi expected to announce formal impeachment inquiry against Trump at 5 pm ET

A Prez that VIOLATES the Constitution every single day.

 

[Blaine Sweeter]

Next time elect someone who isn't a criminal.

We did...Hillary lost.

What was she charged and convicted with?
Her husband was impeached for lying about a blow job.
But he wasn't a ******* autocratic self-appointed king who said just a couple of days ago that he "took over the United States".
Look it up shit-for -brains. It's on whitehouse.gov website.

 

[Bush92]

What a bunch of shit! Complete joke.
Pelosi expected to announce formal impeachment inquiry against Trump at 5 pm ET

A Prez that VIOLATES the Constitution every single day.

How? Examples? Democrats would rather support a career politician like Pelosi over the outsiders who pulled off the greatest election victory in history to save the nation from Hillary. Every Trump supporter who voted for him in 2016 is a true patriot.

 

[beagle9]

Steele's Manafort info wasnt of much use to Weissman and Mueller since it was salacious, unverified, and easily disproved.

chew on that!

Yet the Democrats out of desperation ran with it.

 

[georgephillip]

What a bunch of shit! Complete joke.
Pelosi expected to announce formal impeachment inquiry against Trump at 5 pm ET

If Obama had attempted to convince a foreign leader to pursue a corruption investigation against Tagg Romney in 2011, would you have supported a formal impeachment investigation against the POTUS?

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Next time elect someone who isn't a criminal.

Well neither Trump nor Hillary would be qualified then...

 

[Bush92]

Next time elect someone who isn't a criminal.

We did...Hillary lost.

What was she charged and convicted with?
Her husband was impeached for lying about a blow job.
But he wasn't a ******* autocratic self-appointed king who said just a couple of days ago that he "took over the United States".
Look it up shit-for -brains. It's on whitehouse.gov website.

Democratic controlled FBI never pursed her “bleach biting” hard drives, smashing government cell phones with hammers, Wasserman Schultz scrubbing her hard drive, and connection between Podesta’s brother and foreign businesses that hacked into Clinton’s campaign. Trump had shit to do with any of that.

 

[Crepitus]

What a bunch of shit! Complete joke.
Pelosi expected to announce formal impeachment inquiry against Trump at 5 pm ET

Let us k ow when you decide to elect someone constitutionally.

 

[Bush92]

What a bunch of shit! Complete joke.
Pelosi expected to announce formal impeachment inquiry against Trump at 5 pm ET

If Obama had attempted to convince a foreign leader to pursue a corruption investigation against Tagg Romney in 2011, would you have supported a formal impeachment investigation against the POTUS?

Obama was too busy interfering in Israeli elections.

 

[Bush92]

What a bunch of shit! Complete joke.
Pelosi expected to announce formal impeachment inquiry against Trump at 5 pm ET

Let us k ow when you decide to elect someone constitutionally.

Trump...2016. GW Bush 2000 and 2004.

 

[occupied]

Next time elect someone who isn't a criminal.

We did...Hillary lost.

It's not like you had no idea he was a liar and a crook before you voted for him. You had to have some sort of expectation that he was going to get in hot water what with the way he thinks the rules do not apply to him.

 

[Bush92]

Next time elect someone who isn't a criminal.

We did...Hillary lost.

It's not like you had no idea he was a liar and a crook before you voted for him. You had to have some sort of expectation that he was going to get in hot water what with the way he thinks the rules do not apply to him.

You read minds now I see. Interesting.

 

[conserveguy877]

Pelosi overloaded on the pills today with her impeachment threat. Since the Trump Rusia Hoax failed so hard. These swamp democrats and their Fake News will only help Trump as we get to 2020!

 

[Bush92]

Next time elect someone who isn't a criminal.

We did...Hillary lost.

What was she charged and convicted with?
Her husband was impeached for lying about a blow job.
But he wasn't a ******* autocratic self-appointed king who said just a couple of days ago that he "took over the United States".
Look it up shit-for -brains. It's on whitehouse.gov website.

So you’re saying if Hillary gave better head her husband would not have fooled around and been impeached?