Palin Hit Another Hard One

[concept]

Sarah Palin: Obama and the Bureaucratization of Health Care - WSJ.com

Obama and the Bureaucratization of Health Care

Writing in the New York Times last month, President Barack Obama asked that Americans "talk with one another, and not over one another" as our health-care debate moves forward.

I couldn't agree more. Let's engage the other side's arguments, and let's allow Americans to decide for themselves whether the Democrats' health-care proposals should become governing law.

Some 45 years ago Ronald Reagan said that "no one in this country should be denied medical care because of a lack of funds." Each of us knows that we have an obligation to care for the old, the young and the sick. We stand strongest when we stand with the weakest among us.

We also know that our current health-care system too often burdens individuals and businesses—particularly small businesses—with crippling expenses. And we know that allowing government health-care spending to continue at current rates will only add to our ever-expanding deficit.

How can we ensure that those who need medical care receive it while also reducing health-care costs? The answers offered by Democrats in Washington all rest on one principle: that increased government involvement can solve the problem. I fundamentally disagree.


* * * *

Now look at one way Mr. Obama wants to eliminate inefficiency and waste: He's asked Congress to create an Independent Medicare Advisory Council—an unelected, largely unaccountable group of experts charged with containing Medicare costs. In an interview with the New York Times in April, the president suggested that such a group, working outside of "normal political channels," should guide decisions regarding that "huge driver of cost . . . the chronically ill and those toward the end of their lives . . . ."

Given such statements, is it any wonder that many of the sick and elderly are concerned that the Democrats' proposals will ultimately lead to rationing of their health care by—dare I say it—death panels? Establishment voices dismissed that phrase, but it rang true for many Americans. Working through "normal political channels," they made themselves heard, and as a result Congress will likely reject a wrong-headed proposal to authorize end-of-life counseling in this cost-cutting context.

Palin has written a very good oped here and yes EZ, she even posted it on Facebook too.

Much has been said about her but you have to giver her credit for trying to force the dems into a debate. A debate that they clearly do not want to have.

Even with the house, senate, presidency and the media, democrats are afraid of debating their "obamacare" plan. The less light, the better. This is why people loke Palin are attacked with such vigor everytime they attempt to excercise their rights to debate and discuss something that will affect all of us.



Good job Sarah.

 

[VaYank5150]

Hey look, not a SINGLE idea of her own. Standard GOP bullshit. Oh, I am SHOCKED!

 

[L.K.Eder]

..
Good job Sarah.

what was her job again?

and yes, of course, i am afraid of her. very much so

 

[Fatality]

Hey look, not a SINGLE idea of her own. Standard GOP bullshit. Oh, I am SHOCKED!

liberal prattle

 

[VaYank5150]

Hey look, not a SINGLE idea of her own. Standard GOP bullshit. Oh, I am SHOCKED!

liberal prattle

Did YOU see any ideas from her? Even one? Am I wrong?

 

[Dr Grump]

Er, you do realise somebody wrote it for her, right?

 

[American Horse]

Sarah Palin: Obama and the Bureaucratization of Health Care - WSJ.com

Obama and the Bureaucratization of Health Care

<SNIP>
....
* * * *

Now look at one way Mr. Obama wants to eliminate inefficiency and waste: He's asked Congress to create an Independent Medicare Advisory Council—an unelected, largely unaccountable group of experts charged with containing Medicare costs. In an interview with the New York Times in April, the president suggested that such a group, working outside of "normal political channels," should guide decisions regarding that "huge driver of cost . . . the chronically ill and those toward the end of their lives . . . ."

Given such statements, is it any wonder that many of the sick and elderly are concerned that the Democrats' proposals will ultimately lead to rationing of their health care by—dare I say it—death panels? Establishment voices dismissed that phrase, but it rang true for many Americans. Working through "normal political channels," they made themselves heard, and as a result Congress will likely reject a wrong-headed proposal to authorize end-of-life counseling in this cost-cutting context.

<SNIP>
...
Much has been said about her but you have to giver her credit for trying to force the dems into a debate. A debate that they clearly do not want to have.

Even with the house, senate, presidency and the media, democrats are afraid of debating their "obamacare" plan. The less light, the better. This is why people loke Palin are attacked with such vigor everytime they attempt to excercise their rights to debate and discuss something that will affect all of us.



Good job Sarah.

Sarah focuses like a LASER; any money to be saved will have to come from not treating the sick, because the healthy don't need medical care.

 

[VaYank5150]

Er, you do realise somebody wrote it for her, right?

No basketball references, so yes. Just like her rant with the AP, it is obvious Palin has hired someone to write her speeches and Op-Ed pieces for her.

 

[concept]

Hey look, not a SINGLE idea of her own. Standard GOP bullshit. Oh, I am SHOCKED!

SOP.

 

[concept]

Er, you do realise somebody wrote it for her, right?

^ Critical Theory at work.

 

[Mr. Capitalism]

Sarah Palin: Obama and the Bureaucratization of Health Care - WSJ.com

Obama and the Bureaucratization of Health Care

Writing in the New York Times last month, President Barack Obama asked that Americans "talk with one another, and not over one another" as our health-care debate moves forward.

I couldn't agree more. Let's engage the other side's arguments, and let's allow Americans to decide for themselves whether the Democrats' health-care proposals should become governing law.

Some 45 years ago Ronald Reagan said that "no one in this country should be denied medical care because of a lack of funds." Each of us knows that we have an obligation to care for the old, the young and the sick. We stand strongest when we stand with the weakest among us.

We also know that our current health-care system too often burdens individuals and businesses—particularly small businesses—with crippling expenses. And we know that allowing government health-care spending to continue at current rates will only add to our ever-expanding deficit.

How can we ensure that those who need medical care receive it while also reducing health-care costs? The answers offered by Democrats in Washington all rest on one principle: that increased government involvement can solve the problem. I fundamentally disagree.


* * * *

Now look at one way Mr. Obama wants to eliminate inefficiency and waste: He's asked Congress to create an Independent Medicare Advisory Council—an unelected, largely unaccountable group of experts charged with containing Medicare costs. In an interview with the New York Times in April, the president suggested that such a group, working outside of "normal political channels," should guide decisions regarding that "huge driver of cost . . . the chronically ill and those toward the end of their lives . . . ."

Given such statements, is it any wonder that many of the sick and elderly are concerned that the Democrats' proposals will ultimately lead to rationing of their health care by—dare I say it—death panels? Establishment voices dismissed that phrase, but it rang true for many Americans. Working through "normal political channels," they made themselves heard, and as a result Congress will likely reject a wrong-headed proposal to authorize end-of-life counseling in this cost-cutting context.

Palin has written a very good oped here and yes EZ, she even posted it on Facebook too.

Much has been said about her but you have to giver her credit for trying to force the dems into a debate. A debate that they clearly do not want to have.

Even with the house, senate, presidency and the media, democrats are afraid of debating their "obamacare" plan. The less light, the better. This is why people loke Palin are attacked with such vigor everytime they attempt to excercise their rights to debate and discuss something that will affect all of us.



Good job Sarah.

Everything above the stars are platitudes. Below the stars is the standard death panels bullshit. Yawn.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Er, you do realise somebody wrote it for her, right?

And you can prove that , right?

 

[Zoom-boing]

She is laser sharp and has impeccable timing. Excellent job.

 

[Bahaman]

Sarah Palin is pushing the dems into a debate?!?!?!?!? Man how stupid are you ?????? The dems welcome a debate, a real debate with facts not made up bullsh-t like Palin is spreading. You morons miss the whole point, dems are not scared to debate you mental midgets, they just want an honest debate. Sarah palin is less of a waste of sperm than bush but she is still a waste of sperm!!!

 

[Zoom-boing]

Sarah Palin is pushing the dems into a debate?!?!?!?!? Man how stupid are you ?????? The dems welcome a debate, a real debate with facts not made up bullsh-t like Palin is spreading. You morons miss the whole point, dems are not scared to debate you mental midgets, they just want an honest debate. Sarah palin is lees of a waste of sperm than bush but she is still a waste of sperm!!!

Yeah they want a debate. That's why they pulled the 'end-of-life' proposal from the bill.

 

[Bahaman]

They pulled the end of life proposal?!?!?!? There never was an end of life proposal you moron!!! Stop listening to palin and Limbaugh and find the facts. 1233 was written by a republican named Isackson, when asked about palin's comments about a death panel he said it was absurd. It's morons like you that allow a waste of sperm like Palin to move forward, all normal intelligent people see her for what she is.... A complete moron!!!

 

[concept]

Sarah Palin: Obama and the Bureaucratization of Health Care - WSJ.com

Obama and the Bureaucratization of Health Care

Writing in the New York Times last month, President Barack Obama asked that Americans "talk with one another, and not over one another" as our health-care debate moves forward.

I couldn't agree more. Let's engage the other side's arguments, and let's allow Americans to decide for themselves whether the Democrats' health-care proposals should become governing law.

Some 45 years ago Ronald Reagan said that "no one in this country should be denied medical care because of a lack of funds." Each of us knows that we have an obligation to care for the old, the young and the sick. We stand strongest when we stand with the weakest among us.

We also know that our current health-care system too often burdens individuals and businesses&#8212;particularly small businesses&#8212;with crippling expenses. And we know that allowing government health-care spending to continue at current rates will only add to our ever-expanding deficit.

How can we ensure that those who need medical care receive it while also reducing health-care costs? The answers offered by Democrats in Washington all rest on one principle: that increased government involvement can solve the problem. I fundamentally disagree.


* * * *

Now look at one way Mr. Obama wants to eliminate inefficiency and waste: He's asked Congress to create an Independent Medicare Advisory Council&#8212;an unelected, largely unaccountable group of experts charged with containing Medicare costs. In an interview with the New York Times in April, the president suggested that such a group, working outside of "normal political channels," should guide decisions regarding that "huge driver of cost . . . the chronically ill and those toward the end of their lives . . . ."

Given such statements, is it any wonder that many of the sick and elderly are concerned that the Democrats' proposals will ultimately lead to rationing of their health care by&#8212;dare I say it&#8212;death panels? Establishment voices dismissed that phrase, but it rang true for many Americans. Working through "normal political channels," they made themselves heard, and as a result Congress will likely reject a wrong-headed proposal to authorize end-of-life counseling in this cost-cutting context.

Palin has written a very good oped here and yes EZ, she even posted it on Facebook too.

Much has been said about her but you have to giver her credit for trying to force the dems into a debate. A debate that they clearly do not want to have.

Even with the house, senate, presidency and the media, democrats are afraid of debating their "obamacare" plan. The less light, the better. This is why people loke Palin are attacked with such vigor everytime they attempt to excercise their rights to debate and discuss something that will affect all of us.



Good job Sarah.

Everything above the stars are platitudes. Below the stars is the standard death panels bullshit. Yawn.

"yawn" pretty much sums up your dismissal of her.

Again, more of the same from the "elite".

 

[concept]

They pulled the end of life proposal?!?!?!? There never was an end of life proposal you moron!!! Stop listening to palin and Limbaugh and find the facts. 1233 was written by a republican named Isackson, when asked about palin's comments about a death panel he said it was absurd. It's morons like you that allow a waste of sperm like Palin to move forward, all normal intelligent people see her for what she is.... A complete moron!!!

That sound you hear is my tiny little violin.

Stop sniveling and deal with the failure that is n00bama! He is all yours.

 

[Zoom-boing]

They pulled the end of life proposal?!?!?!? There never was an end of life proposal you moron!!! Stop listening to palin and Limbaugh and find the facts. 1233 was written by a republican named Isackson, when asked about palin's comments about a death panel he said it was absurd. It's morons like you that allow a waste of sperm like Palin to move forward, all normal intelligent people see her for what she is.... A complete moron!!!

Really? There was no 'end-of-life counseling' proposal? What truck did you fall off of?

'moron' 'waste of sperm' 'moron' -- ah, typical Dem ridicule rule. Zzzzzzz.

 

[Dr Grump]

Er, you do realise somebody wrote it for her, right?

^ Critical Theory at work.

Absolutely. Ya know, if you're a con and you want to be taken seriously, then please start parroting Colin Powell or Newt. At least, somebody of substance. When you start talking Palin, you do realise you are spruiking a moron, right?