Palin and the race card

[Soggy in NOLA]

Oh... and I really don't want you to die in a fire.

 

[Madeline]

That is all Failgo is worth... put something up there other than petty race-baiting douchebaggery and links to insane, rant riddled Huff Puff posts and I will respond more favorably.

Until such time.....

Eat shit and die in a fire motherfucker.

I know I'm on the edge of my seat to learn more from you now that you have demonstrated such respect for your fellow Americans, Soggy.

Yanno, you have no legal obligation to behave like a first grader in every debate, correct?

Look kiddo, there are many here that I have fun debating, they poke me, I poke back... it;s ok. But this constant barrage of bullshit, race baiting, imbecilic shit from nitwits like Flaylo, Truthmatters, etc. I Will not let go unabated. It's void of any humor and frankly, any thought other than ME GOOD, YOU BAD.

Tell your buddies to try to move a little, just a little beyond simplistic shitbaggery, and I will treat them accordingly.

Deal?

I assume you are white, Soggy. As I said earlier, there needs to be a long, nuanced and mature convo in this nation about race...especially between whites and blacks. I find fault with your ability to listen just as I do some black USMB-ers ability to communicate. The fact is, there's a huge gulf between your life experience and theirs and if all of you are men, between yours and the experiences of females, black and white.

You have two choices that make much sense, as I see it. You can open up and try to learn from those you see as very different from yourself, or you can ignore them. And by "learning" I do not mean setting aside your own life experience and common sense. I mean suspending disbelief and listening so as to gain insight into what their life experience and common sense has led them to think. A dialogue as opposed to an endorsement, Soggy.

Mindless childish insults towards the people with whom you chronically disagree add nothing to anyone else's ability to use USMB and they don't show you in the best light.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Geoffrey Dunn: Sarah Palin Slams Michelle Obama in Racially Charged Passage From New Book

Don't retreat, reload your race card and charge away.

As usual, Gunny posting childish insults and dumb gifs further exposing his inability to make a coherent argument, here you go leatherneck why don't you....

Lets see those debate skills Gunner, quit running your trap about what you could do and just put up or keep your trap shut and stay out of threads where the intellectually superior[over you] post.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

I know I'm on the edge of my seat to learn more from you now that you have demonstrated such respect for your fellow Americans, Soggy.

Yanno, you have no legal obligation to behave like a first grader in every debate, correct?

Look kiddo, there are many here that I have fun debating, they poke me, I poke back... it;s ok. But this constant barrage of bullshit, race baiting, imbecilic shit from nitwits like Flaylo, Truthmatters, etc. I Will not let go unabated. It's void of any humor and frankly, any thought other than ME GOOD, YOU BAD.

Tell your buddies to try to move a little, just a little beyond simplistic shitbaggery, and I will treat them accordingly.

Deal?

I assume you are white, Soggy. As I said earlier, there needs to be a long, nuanced and mature convo in this nation about race...especially between whites and blacks. I find fault with your ability to listen just as I do some black USMB-ers ability to communicate. The fact is, there's a huge gulf between your life experience and theirs and if all of you are men, between yours and the experiences of females, black and white.

You have two choices that make much sense, as I see it. You can open up and try to learn from those you see as very different from yourself, or you can ignore them. And by "learning" I do not mean setting aside your own life experience and common sense. I mean suspending disbelief and listening so as to gain insight into what their life experience and common sense has led them to think. A dialogue as opposed to an endorsement, Soggy.

Mindless childish insults towards the people with whom you chronically disagree add nothing to anyone else's ability to use USMB and they don't show you in the best light.

Soggy is childish troll that always attacks the person and not the argument because he's incapable of making any argument just like most of the rightwing garbage in this forum.

 

[Tank]

Shouldn't they want to be called American Africans instead of African Americans?

 

[Si modo]

I am far less partisan than you are, Ravi. In fact, you're too partisan to recognize anyone who isn't.

Idiot.

Your phoney pretense of not being partisan is what gives your partisanship an extra special repugnance.

Ha! "Not partisan" to such a degree that CG even defended Clarence Thomas in a discussion about the Anita Hill debacle.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspiracy-theories/138807-clarence-thomas-drank-heavily-watched-porn.html

The chronic knee-jerk response to anything and anyone associated in her mind with the right by assuming the shape of a human pretzel is exactly why I finally put her on ignore. No analysis, no independent thought, just reguritatig someone else's thoughts about why any and all conservatives and supposed conservatives are always correct. Always with an added bit of snottiness and a false claim of superiority. (She's richer, faster, smarter, more accomplished and sexier than anyone else on USMB, donca know.)

It's boring and I could write CG's posts myself, in my sleep. Mayhaps one day she'll grow up, find her Big Girl Panties and show a little backbone, but I doubt it. I assume in 20 more years, she'll sound just like WillowTree.

Analysis of statements does not equal a defense, unless one is as completely stupid and/or insane as you are.

 

[L.K.Eder]

i never got what was so unpatriotic about that statement. what suggestions do people have as to what other situations should have made her 'really proud of her country' at other times in her 'adult life'? is this the kinda shit other people are meant to determine for us in the first place?

it is a deeply personal statement and there is nothing wrong with it.

thought police on the march, lol

i thought this "outrage" would be dumped after the 2008 election.

but no, here it is again. and again. and supported by the usual suspects.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Flayglo, I doubt anyone in the US dislikes Palin more than I do, but her comments about the First Lady are not indefensible if your reading of the quote in question is as strained as Palin's apparently is. Like it or not, the future First Lady was in error/chose her words badly when she said "And let me tell you something -- for the first time in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of my country."

Palin exploited this obvious speech error by suggesting that the First Lady is not patriotic, which BTW is not a racially charged POV.

You need to read from sources other than HuffPo, Flayglo....they ain't been doing a great job lately.

Try the Cleveland Plain Dealer.......

Sarah Palin quotes Ronald Reagan a lot; she should study him more: an op-ed | cleveland.com

Palin exploited this obvious speech error by suggesting that the First Lady is not patriotic, which BTW is not a racially charged POV.

You really think it was an error of words on her part? Her speech was pre written, shes college educated surely you aren't suggesting that a college educated person make such a stupid comment as that, unless they actually meant it.

Read my response monkey, Michelle Obama was not being unpatriotic, look at how blacks have been treated in America, you should be shocked to find patriotic blacks.

I do not need to read your reply baboon. It's an old line I have heard before.
Granted backs from the 60's on backs blacks had it rough. But I do not pitty any blacks that was born after civil rights became law. Younger blacks have been given just about everything. So go fuck yourself and that bull shit about how blacks were treated.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Your phoney pretense of not being partisan is what gives your partisanship an extra special repugnance.

Ha! "Not partisan" to such a degree that CG even defended Clarence Thomas in a discussion about the Anita Hill debacle.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspiracy-theories/138807-clarence-thomas-drank-heavily-watched-porn.html

The chronic knee-jerk response to anything and anyone associated in her mind with the right by assuming the shape of a human pretzel is exactly why I finally put her on ignore. No analysis, no independent thought, just reguritatig someone else's thoughts about why any and all conservatives and supposed conservatives are always correct. Always with an added bit of snottiness and a false claim of superiority. (She's richer, faster, smarter, more accomplished and sexier than anyone else on USMB, donca know.)

It's boring and I could write CG's posts myself, in my sleep. Mayhaps one day she'll grow up, find her Big Girl Panties and show a little backbone, but I doubt it. I assume in 20 more years, she'll sound just like WillowTree.

Analysis of statements does not equal a defense, unless one is as completely stupid and/or insane as you are.

Shut up you butt kissing frog, don't ever question my debating skills with your dumb rep points, just stand up and make a coherent argument on your own. Forming messageboard alliances who are as equally stupid as you are patting each other on the back does not equal a defense, refutation or proof of debating skills, its simply a case of one blind monkey leading the rest into the ditch.

 

[Madeline]

Ha! "Not partisan" to such a degree that CG even defended Clarence Thomas in a discussion about the Anita Hill debacle.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspiracy-theories/138807-clarence-thomas-drank-heavily-watched-porn.html

The chronic knee-jerk response to anything and anyone associated in her mind with the right by assuming the shape of a human pretzel is exactly why I finally put her on ignore. No analysis, no independent thought, just reguritatig someone else's thoughts about why any and all conservatives and supposed conservatives are always correct. Always with an added bit of snottiness and a false claim of superiority. (She's richer, faster, smarter, more accomplished and sexier than anyone else on USMB, donca know.)

It's boring and I could write CG's posts myself, in my sleep. Mayhaps one day she'll grow up, find her Big Girl Panties and show a little backbone, but I doubt it. I assume in 20 more years, she'll sound just like WillowTree.

Analysis of statements does not equal a defense, unless one is as completely stupid and/or insane as you are.

Shut up you butt kissing frog, don't ever question my debating skills with your dumb rep points, just stand up and make a coherent argument on your own. Forming messageboard alliances who are as equally stupid as you are patting each other on the back does not equal a defense, refutation or proof of debating skills, its simply a case of one blind monkey leading the rest into the ditch.

Aw, dun holler at Si, Bass. She's afraid to have an opinion without CG and vise versa. They've been behaving like TweedleDee and TweedleDum on USMB for weeks now.

Gotta pity such fearful people, Bass.

 

[Madeline]

You really think it was an error of words on her part? Her speech was pre written, shes college educated surely you aren't suggesting that a college educated person make such a stupid comment as that, unless they actually meant it.

Read my response monkey, Michelle Obama was not being unpatriotic, look at how blacks have been treated in America, you should be shocked to find patriotic blacks.

I do not need to read your reply baboon. It's an old line I have heard before.
Granted backs from the 60's on backs blacks had it rough. But I do not pitty any blacks that was born after civil rights became law. Younger blacks have been given just about everything. So go fuck yourself and that bull shit about how blacks were treated.

This is complete bullshit, bigrebnc. Unemployment among black Americans is at almost 17% -- nearly TWICE what it is for Americans generally. Unemployment among black teens is at FIFTY PERCENT.

Table A-2. Employment status of the civilian population by race, sex, and age

African American Teen Unemployment Rate at a 25 Year High | The LA Progressive

35.4 percent of all black American children live in poverty, compared to the national average of "only" 20.7%.

National Poverty Center | University of Michigan

Shall I go on? Infant mortality; teen pregnancy; high school drop out rates; lead posioning cases; STI rates -- in short, all the economic and environment stresses of modern American life fall VERY unevenly on black Americans today. Claiming "racism is yesterday's news" is just so much BULLSHIT.

 

[California Girl]

Ha! "Not partisan" to such a degree that CG even defended Clarence Thomas in a discussion about the Anita Hill debacle.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspiracy-theories/138807-clarence-thomas-drank-heavily-watched-porn.html

The chronic knee-jerk response to anything and anyone associated in her mind with the right by assuming the shape of a human pretzel is exactly why I finally put her on ignore. No analysis, no independent thought, just reguritatig someone else's thoughts about why any and all conservatives and supposed conservatives are always correct. Always with an added bit of snottiness and a false claim of superiority. (She's richer, faster, smarter, more accomplished and sexier than anyone else on USMB, donca know.)

It's boring and I could write CG's posts myself, in my sleep. Mayhaps one day she'll grow up, find her Big Girl Panties and show a little backbone, but I doubt it. I assume in 20 more years, she'll sound just like WillowTree.

I see Maddie's still regurgitating her lies.

I couldn't write Maddie's posts though - I can't dumb down far enough.

You could not write my posts because you dun have my education and experience, nor my unique POV on Planet Earth. You do have such things of your own with which you could write, but you choose instead to reach for your handy dispenser box of Beckisms and that, my dear, is what makes you
b-o-r-i-n-g.

So much for you ignoring me, bitch.

 

[California Girl]

Ha! "Not partisan" to such a degree that CG even defended Clarence Thomas in a discussion about the Anita Hill debacle.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspiracy-theories/138807-clarence-thomas-drank-heavily-watched-porn.html

The chronic knee-jerk response to anything and anyone associated in her mind with the right by assuming the shape of a human pretzel is exactly why I finally put her on ignore. No analysis, no independent thought, just reguritatig someone else's thoughts about why any and all conservatives and supposed conservatives are always correct. Always with an added bit of snottiness and a false claim of superiority. (She's richer, faster, smarter, more accomplished and sexier than anyone else on USMB, donca know.)

It's boring and I could write CG's posts myself, in my sleep. Mayhaps one day she'll grow up, find her Big Girl Panties and show a little backbone, but I doubt it. I assume in 20 more years, she'll sound just like WillowTree.

Analysis of statements does not equal a defense, unless one is as completely stupid and/or insane as you are.

Shut up you butt kissing frog, don't ever question my debating skills with your dumb rep points, just stand up and make a coherent argument on your own. Forming messageboard alliances who are as equally stupid as you are patting each other on the back does not equal a defense, refutation or proof of debating skills, its simply a case of one blind monkey leading the rest into the ditch.

Your problem, Maddie, is that you think anyone who disagrees with you automatically accepts the opposite view. That's cuz you dumb. There is not one post from me 'defending' Thomas. Not one. You're just too fucking stupid to comprehend plain US English.

 

[Madeline]

I see Maddie's still regurgitating her lies.

I couldn't write Maddie's posts though - I can't dumb down far enough.

You could not write my posts because you dun have my education and experience, nor my unique POV on Planet Earth. You do have such things of your own with which you could write, but you choose instead to reach for your handy dispenser box of Beckisms and that, my dear, is what makes you
b-o-r-i-n-g.

So much for you ignoring me, bitch.

Back into the used toy box you go, TweedleDum.

 

[L.K.Eder]

Analysis of statements does not equal a defense, unless one is as completely stupid and/or insane as you are.

Shut up you butt kissing frog, don't ever question my debating skills with your dumb rep points, just stand up and make a coherent argument on your own. Forming messageboard alliances who are as equally stupid as you are patting each other on the back does not equal a defense, refutation or proof of debating skills, its simply a case of one blind monkey leading the rest into the ditch.

Your problem, Maddie, is that you think anyone who disagrees with you automatically accepts the opposite view. That's cuz you dumb. There is not one post from me 'defending' Thomas. Not one. You're just too fucking stupid to comprehend plain US English.

one of your most obvious problems is that anyone who seems to not totally share your view is labelled "stupid".

unless that one is someone you suck up to.

 

[California Girl]

Shut up you butt kissing frog, don't ever question my debating skills with your dumb rep points, just stand up and make a coherent argument on your own. Forming messageboard alliances who are as equally stupid as you are patting each other on the back does not equal a defense, refutation or proof of debating skills, its simply a case of one blind monkey leading the rest into the ditch.

Your problem, Maddie, is that you think anyone who disagrees with you automatically accepts the opposite view. That's cuz you dumb. There is not one post from me 'defending' Thomas. Not one. You're just too fucking stupid to comprehend plain US English.

one of your most obvious problems is that anyone who seems to not totally share your view is labelled "stupid".

unless that one is someone you suck up to.

No, I label people stupid when they provide evidence to suggest it. Now, in the Thomas thread that Maddie refers to, I did NOT defend Thomas. I simply questioned the validity of the source - which is a damned sight more than Maddie did. The source being an ex girlfriend - who just happens to have written a book and is looking for a publisher - has a clear agenda. I question anyone with an agenda.... That, to Maddie, is 'defending' Thomas. That's why I called her stupid.... because she is.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I am far less partisan than you are, Ravi. In fact, you're too partisan to recognize anyone who isn't.

Idiot.

Your phoney pretense of not being partisan is what gives your partisanship an extra special repugnance.

I'm right wing. I'm not a big fan of the GOP.... as most intelligent posters know. I'm not a fan of politicians generally..... but don't let facts get in the way of your bitching.

Being rightwing IS being partisan. The word applies as much to political philosophy as it does to D's vs. R's.

 

[Madeline]

Shut up you butt kissing frog, don't ever question my debating skills with your dumb rep points, just stand up and make a coherent argument on your own. Forming messageboard alliances who are as equally stupid as you are patting each other on the back does not equal a defense, refutation or proof of debating skills, its simply a case of one blind monkey leading the rest into the ditch.

Your problem, Maddie, is that you think anyone who disagrees with you automatically accepts the opposite view. That's cuz you dumb. There is not one post from me 'defending' Thomas. Not one. You're just too fucking stupid to comprehend plain US English.

one of your most obvious problems is that anyone who seems to not totally share your view is labelled "stupid".

unless that one is someone you suck up to.

My "problem" is that I perceive a bias so heavy it'd tip over an armoured car vehicle when CG and Si plug their ears and chant together to avoid hearing any criticism of Thomas merely because, in their minds, he's a conservative and therefore "must" be held harmless from any bad act he has committed.

Then of course, there's all the hypocrisy, intellectual dishonesty, petty carping, snipping at others perceived to be liked by me and general assholey behavior.

 

[NYcarbineer]

There are good reasons Sarah Palin's favorability is in the high 30's and Michelle Obama's is in the high 60's.

This little spew by Palin would be one more reason.

 

[L.K.Eder]

Your problem, Maddie, is that you think anyone who disagrees with you automatically accepts the opposite view. That's cuz you dumb. There is not one post from me 'defending' Thomas. Not one. You're just too fucking stupid to comprehend plain US English.

one of your most obvious problems is that anyone who seems to not totally share your view is labelled "stupid".

unless that one is someone you suck up to.

My "problem" is that I perceive a bias so heavy it'd tip over an armoured car vehicle when CG and Si plug their ears and chant together to avoid hearing any criticism of Thomas merely because, in their minds, he's a conservative and therefore "must" be held harmless from any bad act he has committed.

Then of course, there's all the hypocrisy, intellectual dishonesty, petty carping, snipping at others perceived to be liked by me and general assholey behavior.

your problem is that you are a hip-shooter. you are too enthusiastic and run head-on into something.

but your solution is that you will actually acknowledge sometimes that you did that.

so you are capable of self-evaluation and adaptation.

that's why i respect you as a genuine personality.

now you can tell my what my problems are besides being judgmental.