Palestine Today

[Hollie]

Strange. Valentine’s Day is one of those evil, infidel holidays.



"Palestine is My Valentine," PA Security Forces spokesman erases all of Israel - PMW Bulletins

"Palestine is My Valentine"

Spokesman of PA Security Forces promotes
map of "Palestine" that erases all of Israel

By Nan Jacques Zilberdik

Official Spokesman of the PA Security Forces Adnan Al-Damiri exploited the occasion of Valentine's Day to promote the Palestinian Authority's map of "Palestine" that presents all of Israel as "Palestine" together with the PA areas. In Al-Damiri's Valentine version of the map, "Palestine" was made out of hearts.

 

[Hollie]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, the question of "rights 'vs' obligations 'vs' entitlements" ⇒

To speak of the Palestinians and illusionary boundaries that they do not maintain, do not control, and never have controlled,

Occupying powers control but that does not negate the Palestinian's rights.

(COMMENT)

Any "right" the Arab Palestinians have - are granted to the Israeli as well... (Part I - CCPR)

• The Arab Palestinian "Right to Self-Determination, and all other rights) does NOT impose an obligation on the part of any other sovereignty; including Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Egypt and Israel.
  
• The Rights of the Arab Palestinian may not interfere with the Rights of the Israeli.
• The Arab Palestinian has no Right to impose an obligation on - or - demand an entitlement of Israel.

Just as the Arab Palestinian has the right to freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development → so it is the case that Israel has the right to freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development. Israel (like Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and Egypt) has no obligation to forfeit any of its benefits → based on a claim derived by any right held by the Arab Palestinian.

There is NO right to self-defense (security of the nation) in the CCPR (in fact, except for Article 14, the issue of self-defense is not even raised). That right is derivative from Articles 2 and 51 of the UN Charter; although most Common and Customary Law take it as an unarguable truth.

The Arab Palestinians have NO right to prolong a conflict over territory the Israelis established control over from the Jordanians → and → subsequently abandon by the Jordanians → in favor of leaving the territory in the effective control by the Israelis. And the Israelis have no obligation to surrender the territory to a leadership with the threat of armed conflict and jihad on the table.

"No single answer exists for resolving the intractable RIGHT VS. RIGHT dilemmas;
however, the RESOLUTION PRINCIPLES PRIME provides ways to handle
and resolve colliding rights. Resolution is critical, because getting stuck and
standing still for too long is dangerous and may be fatal to your efforts."
(The Primes Solve any Problem: Right 'vs' Right)
​

Most Respectfully,
R

Where do you get all that crap from your link? Could you be more specific?

It’s actually hilarious to watch as you get flusterd and flummoxed.

 

[Hollie]

Mo’ money, Mo’ money....

Oh, wait.

 

[P F Tinmore]

San Francisco

 

[Hollie]

The Islamic terrorist welfare fraud has hit a bump in the road, or, maybe it has run over a Hamas terrorist in a ski mask.

 

[P F Tinmore]

MERRY CHRISTMAS FROM THE CHILDREN OF AIDA REFUGEE CAMP

 

[Hollie]

Happy welfare from The Great Satan

 

[P F Tinmore]

Mahmoud al-Kurd from Gaza was announced today at Dar al-Kalima University College of Arts and Culture the winner of the Karimeh Abboud Photography Award with this work entitled “Perhaps the most beautiful memories are those of a place.” Unfortunately Mohammad was not granted a permit by the Israeli authorities to come to Bethlehem to receive his award. Nevertheless, we were able to connect via skype. His immediate reaction for bring the winner of this year competition “This is the best news in 2017.”

 

[Hollie]

There’s just no pleasing Islamic terrorists welfare cheats.

I’d expect some major sucking up from these people with a lot more “Oh, how can we help you, help us”. What a bunch of ungrateful third-worlders’ with a sense of welfare fraud entitlement.

 

[Hollie]

Mahmoud al-Kurd from Gaza was announced today at Dar al-Kalima University College of Arts and Culture the winner of the Karimeh Abboud Photography Award with this work entitled “Perhaps the most beautiful memories are those of a place.” Unfortunately Mohammad was not granted a permit by the Israeli authorities to come to Bethlehem to receive his award. Nevertheless, we were able to connect via skype. His immediate reaction for bring the winner of this year competition “This is the best news in 2017.”

Strange that Islamics decided not to show Arabs-Moslems pushing their children into the war zone with explosives strapped to their chests.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Hollie]

 

[Hollie]

Well that’s pretty typical.

 

[Hollie]

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israel cannot bomb BDS.

 

[Hollie]

Israel cannot bomb BDS.

You poor, dear. You’re just incensed when your Joooooo hating heroes are exposed as such.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Well, to be honest and in answer to your question, I went to school.

Yes, the question of "rights 'vs' obligations 'vs' entitlements" ⇒

Where do you get all that crap from your link? Could you be more specific?

(COMMENT)

∆ Difference Between Rights and Obligation •

✪ The key difference between rights and obligation is that:

• Rights refer to what we gain,

√ Rights have to be viewed as individual entitlements such as freedom.​

• Obligations refer to what we should do.

√ Obligations, on the other hand, are our responsibilities as citizens or individuals of the society.​

I think I've tried to explain this before.

• You have a RIGHT to own a home.
  
• I cannot stop you from owning a home.
• BUT I have NO OBLIGATION to give you my home.
• No one is even obligated to assist you in acquiring a home.

∆ Both Rights and Obligations •
UN OHCHR

Human rights entail both rights and obligations. States assume obligations and duties under international law to respect, to protect and to fulfil human rights. The obligation to respect means that States must refrain from interfering with or curtailing the enjoyment of human rights. The obligation to protect requires States to protect individuals and groups against human rights abuses. The obligation to fulfil means that States must take positive action to facilitate the enjoyment of basic human rights. At the individual level, while we are entitled our human rights, we should also respect the human rights of others.

International Human Rights Law

✪ Israel assume obligations and duties:

• Obligation to respect means that Israel must refrain from interfering with Arab Palestinian Rights.
• Obligation to respect means that Israel must refrain from curtailing the enjoyment of Arab Palestinian rights.​

✪ Israel assume responsibility for protection:

• Obligation to protect requires States to protect individuals and groups against human rights abuses.
• Obligation to fulfil means that States must take positive action to facilitate the enjoyment of basic human rights.​

Some fundamental human rights norms enjoy universal protection by customary international law across all boundaries and civilizations. Israel has the responsibility under Article 43 - Hague Regulation to "take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country."

Sabotage (as applied to the Arab - Palestinian Conflict) is the act of hampering, deliberating subverting, or hurting the efforts of Israel in the accomplishment of its Article 43 duties. It is most often an issue in the context of military law, when a person attempts to thwart the Article 43 effort, or when disgruntled Arab Palestinians commit an offence which:

✪ Is when the Arab - Palestinian solely intended to harm the Occupying Power.
✪ In cases where the Arab - Palestinian is guilty of espionage.
✪ In cases where the Arab - Palestinian serious commits acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power.
✪ In cases where the Arab - Palestinian serious commits intentional offences which have caused the death of one or more persons.​

There is a fiduciary responsibility for the State of Israel to provide the necessary protection against the threatened Arab Palestinian attacks against the citizens and to take the necessary action to thwart hostile action that challenges the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the State of Israel.

Just as the unilateral withdraw from the Gaza Strip proved, there is no reasonable expectation that such a unilateral withdraw from the West Bank will be in the "best interest" of Israel. The Arab Palestinians have demonstrated that they represent an unreasonable risk to let run unsupervised in the local area of the region.

Just One Mans Opinion.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Well, to be honest and in answer to your question, I went to school.

Yes, the question of "rights 'vs' obligations 'vs' entitlements" ⇒

Where do you get all that crap from your link? Could you be more specific?

(COMMENT)

∆ Difference Between Rights and Obligation •

✪ The key difference between rights and obligation is that:

• Rights refer to what we gain,

√ Rights have to be viewed as individual entitlements such as freedom.​

• Obligations refer to what we should do.

√ Obligations, on the other hand, are our responsibilities as citizens or individuals of the society.​

I think I've tried to explain this before.

• You have a RIGHT to own a home.
  
• I cannot stop you from owning a home.
• BUT I have NO OBLIGATION to give you my home.
• No one is even obligated to assist you in acquiring a home.

∆ Both Rights and Obligations •
UN OHCHR

Human rights entail both rights and obligations. States assume obligations and duties under international law to respect, to protect and to fulfil human rights. The obligation to respect means that States must refrain from interfering with or curtailing the enjoyment of human rights. The obligation to protect requires States to protect individuals and groups against human rights abuses. The obligation to fulfil means that States must take positive action to facilitate the enjoyment of basic human rights. At the individual level, while we are entitled our human rights, we should also respect the human rights of others.

International Human Rights Law

✪ Israel assume obligations and duties:

• Obligation to respect means that Israel must refrain from interfering with Arab Palestinian Rights.
• Obligation to respect means that Israel must refrain from curtailing the enjoyment of Arab Palestinian rights.​

✪ Israel assume responsibility for protection:

• Obligation to protect requires States to protect individuals and groups against human rights abuses.
• Obligation to fulfil means that States must take positive action to facilitate the enjoyment of basic human rights.​

Some fundamental human rights norms enjoy universal protection by customary international law across all boundaries and civilizations. Israel has the responsibility under Article 43 - Hague Regulation to "take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country."

Sabotage (as applied to the Arab - Palestinian Conflict) is the act of hampering, deliberating subverting, or hurting the efforts of Israel in the accomplishment of its Article 43 duties. It is most often an issue in the context of military law, when a person attempts to thwart the Article 43 effort, or when disgruntled Arab Palestinians commit an offence which:

✪ Is when the Arab - Palestinian solely intended to harm the Occupying Power.
✪ In cases where the Arab - Palestinian is guilty of espionage.
✪ In cases where the Arab - Palestinian serious commits acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power.
✪ In cases where the Arab - Palestinian serious commits intentional offences which have caused the death of one or more persons.​

There is a fiduciary responsibility for the State of Israel to provide the necessary protection against the threatened Arab Palestinian attacks against the citizens and to take the necessary action to thwart hostile action that challenges the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the State of Israel.

Just as the unilateral withdraw from the Gaza Strip proved, there is no reasonable expectation that such a unilateral withdraw from the West Bank will be in the "best interest" of Israel. The Arab Palestinians have demonstrated that they represent an unreasonable risk to let run unsupervised in the local area of the region.

Just One Mans Opinion.

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel is on the wrong side of history in many places here.

Israel has the responsibility under Article 43 - Hague Regulation to "take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country."

Israel has never done this. Quite the opposite. And any blow back Israel gets for its violations, the liars in Israel call terrorism.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[rylah]

When his Mufti goes like this, .

Then when Arafat takes Your (Tayysir Tamimi) uncle to appoint him as an executioner of every Arab who sells land to Jews:

One HAS to oppose those vile Jew haters.