RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, ILOVEISRAEL, Hollie, et al,
Oh, don't be so narrow-minded...
Lamis Deek - islamist fascist.
Thank you! Just more proof that the Palestinians don’t want s “ Two State Solution “ I
It is Israel that destroyed the two state solution. Now their policies are coming around to bite it on the ass.
(COMMENT)
It was the Arab Palestinian that rejected the two-state solution recommended by UNSCOP Recommendations -- for the partition of the territory.
[T]he Arab Higher Committee Delegation wishes to stress the following:
✪ A/AC.21/10 16 February 1948 ✪
(a) The Arabs of Palestine will never recognize the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them.
(b) The Arabs of Palestine consider that any attempt by the Jews or any power group of powers to establish a Jewish state in Arab territory is an act of aggression which will be resisted in self-defense.
(c) It is very unwise and fruitless to ask any commission to proceed to Palestine because not a single Arab will cooperate with the said Commission.
(d) The United Nations or its Commission should not be misled to believe that its efforts in the partition plan will meet with any success. It will be far better for the eclipsed prestige of this organization not to start on this adventure.
(e) The United Nations prestige will be better served by abandoning, not enforcing such an injustice.
(f) The determination of every Arab in Palestine is to oppose in every way the partition of that country.
(g) The Arabs of Palestine made a solemn declaration before the United Nations, before God and history, that they will never submit or yield to any power going to Palestine to enforce partition. The only way to establish partition is first to wipe them out — man, woman and child.
✪ The Khartoum Resolutions; September 1, 1967 ✪
The Arab Heads of State have agreed to unite their political efforts at the international and diplomatic level to eliminate the effects of the aggression and to ensure the withdrawal of the aggressive Israeli forces from the Arab lands which have been occupied since the aggression of June 5. This will be done within the framework of the main principles by which the Arab States abide, namely, no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with it, and insistence on the rights of the Palestinian people in their own country.
✪ Peaceful Solutions, Initiatives and International Conferences: Article Thirteen 1988: ✪
Initiatives, and so-called peaceful solutions and international conferences, are in contradiction to the principles of the Islamic Resistance Movement.
------------------------------------------------
There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors.
Again, while neither side can claim the absolute high ground, certainly, it was the Arab Palestinians that constantly held the most consistent position against a peaceful resolution. It has not been the case once
(not a single time) in the interval between the final establishment of the Jewish National Home, and the present day generation of Jihadist, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters, that pretend to be a valiant resistance --- struggling for control of a land that they have neither ruled nor defended since the control under the Ottoman Empire began.
✪ HAMAS published a Major Position Paper 2012 ✪
Jihad and the armed resistance is the right and real method for the liberation of Palestine ---
The present-day Hostile Arab Palestinian should hang their head in same for the innocent deaths they caused in their reign of terror in the more than last half-century. The brand their death a resistance, yet do not serve their people. One look at the Gaza or Ramallahxz Government and you can see that the saga of returning the land to the Islamic people is really only to mask the financial gain for a corrupt leadership, political control for their power, and their religious or ideological aims to subdue the people. But it has nothing to do with the rise and improvement in the development of the greater population.
Most Respectfully,
R