These two things can not be correlated in the way you are trying to fit them. The late 70s early 80s affiliation between Bin Laden and our CIA against the soviets does not really fit into 9/11 at all.
Correlation does not imply causation, in other words.
remember that next time you yammer about 911!
No, you remember it. The thing you fail to realize about my beliefs regarding the events of 9/11 are simple. I know for a FACT, that we did not get the whole story. I do not claim govt. involvement or pursue it because I can not prove such an allegation. That does not mean i blindly submit to what the Commision report offers up as the end all to the events. By doing so, you're setting yourself up as nothing more than one of th eseveral million mindless cattle that "MOO" there way around daily believing every outlandish scrap of "evidence" and story handed to them by government officials.
The information regarding Bin Laden as an asset during the soviet invasion of Afghan is well known. That does not mean it correlates to 9/11. Then again, it doesn't mean it doesn't either. We'll never really know and that's how the intelligence world works. All you simple minded "we know everything there is to know" lackies just can't seem to get it.
Then again, you ONLY come here to try and refute 9/11 theories. Mainly by junk sources to boot. Which is why you get the shill troll, goobermint agent status.