Non-believers can believe in the creation science as science backs it up. Practically all of the top scientists in history were creationists, so there is much credibility there.
Science does not 'back up' ID'iot creationerism. Religious extremism us not science.
True. But science progressed as it gained knowledge, today only a few top scientists are creationists. What does that tell you?
There is very little credibility there. The church was a ruthless, authoritarian boat anchor around the neck of humanity for centuries. During the Dark Ages, the Church would crush any dissent from its doctrine. The church would imprison and torture those who contradicted its propaganda. The false label "creationer science" you impose on people who never identified as such is just a reflection of the extremism and intolerance that defined the church for centuries.
I have provided the evidence to the atheists and especially you many times. You reached the point of not having the intellectual capacity many posts ago since you provide no counter argument.
Heh. Where are your atheist scientists of today and their modern findings?
Charlatans at extremist ministries should be ignored.
You presented no credible evidence.
Sorry but science follows the evidence. Scientists that don't get left behind. That is why 200 years ago most scientists were creationists, now we have evidence for natural forces, and no evidence for supernatural ones, so the proportion has changed dramatically.
The evidence backs creation. There are no evidence for modern evolution just as there was no evidence for past evolution. The sorry is with you and modern evolutionists. Whether you believe me or creationists today doesn't matter. Your punishment can wait until atheists and you die. Of course, no atheist can escape death and what is in store for them.
There is no evidence for supernatural / godly creation. That's exactly why you cut and paste the same phony claims stolen from creationer charlatans and run for the exits when you're tasked with supporting those phony claims.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/four-or-the-species-of-finch-observed-by-darwin-on-the-galapagos-islands-802464738-5c452bbbc9e77c0001d34a79.jpg)
I couldn't help but notice you failed to respond to my comments addressing your cut and paste nonsense.
It's been shown that the difference in Darwin's finches was interbreeding, i.e. produces variety within a single species, and not evolution. If that's all you have, then evolution didn't happen.There certainly is evidence for evolution which is ongoing.
How Finches Helped Darwin Develop His Theory of Evolution
Explaining Charles Darwin's finches and how the study of them on the Galapagos Islands and South American mainland led to the theory of evolution.www.thoughtco.com
It's been shown you spend way too much time trolling through creationer ministries.
