Oddball
Unobtanium Member
But what about Harry Mudd?

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hell, in this timeline he's probably made hundreds of millions on some planet full of dupes by convincing them that their vehicle exhaust emissions are the lone and only reason for their global warming that's not actually happening!But what about Harry Mudd?
![]()
But what about Harry Mudd?
![]()
Roger C Carmel had a bad ending.Hell, in this timeline he's probably made hundreds of millions on some planet full of dupes by convincing them that their vehicle exhaust emissions are the lone and only reason for their global warming that's not actually happening!But what about Harry Mudd?
![]()
]Klingons? No mention of them at all, do they exist in this new timeline and if so, are they changed?
He didn't hate them. He felt they stepped outside of canon too much. One example, in TWOK Checkov and Khan remember each other, but in ToS Checkov wasn't a member of the Enterprise crew when Khan was first encountered. They couldn't have remembered each other because, they never met.As for Gene's opinion, I kinda stopped caring what he thought after I read up on the behind the scenes stuff for Wrath of Khan and The Undiscovered Country. Those were arguably the best of the original crew's work, and Roddenberry hated them with a passion.
TO: J.J. Abrams
FROM: Me
STARDATE: 2009.1119
SUBJECT: Star Trek
Okay, I got the DVD and watched it and all of the special features. Being a life long ST fan, I had to at least see for myself what you have done.
I skipped this movie at the theater, because from what I saw as a long time editor of the Star Trek Wiki I didn't think I would like it. I objected to your destroying of the canon, and really felt the time travel plot device and the "Evil Renegade Romulan" have been way overused in Star Trek.
Everything Star Trek before your movie is still canon, but now canon of an alternate timeline. I get that, actually got it a year before the movie came out. Accepting it was the problem.
But after watching your movie, only one thought came to mind: Gene Roddenberry somewhere was smiling. Gene, wherever he is, approves. I really believe that. And I hope that to you, it's the best complement I could pay.
Because Gene was all about solving problems, and your problem was twofold -- the massive existing canon made telling new stories nearly impossible especially if you're going to use the original crew, and there's no getting around the fact that pretty much everything has been covered already, either in the original work or the many spin-offs and movies which came after. The Star Trek Universe was stale.
Now it's a whole new palate, a whole new canvas for yourself or perhaps future Trek film makers to paint on, making the entire thing all new again.
My hat is off to you and all who worked on this film. Nice job. You've won a convert and a fan.
Carry on. Warp Speed.
Of course!TO: J.J. Abrams
FROM: Me
STARDATE: 2009.1119
SUBJECT: Star Trek
Okay, I got the DVD and watched it and all of the special features. Being a life long ST fan, I had to at least see for myself what you have done.
I skipped this movie at the theater, because from what I saw as a long time editor of the Star Trek Wiki I didn't think I would like it. I objected to your destroying of the canon, and really felt the time travel plot device and the "Evil Renegade Romulan" have been way overused in Star Trek.
Everything Star Trek before your movie is still canon, but now canon of an alternate timeline. I get that, actually got it a year before the movie came out. Accepting it was the problem.
But after watching your movie, only one thought came to mind: Gene Roddenberry somewhere was smiling. Gene, wherever he is, approves. I really believe that. And I hope that to you, it's the best complement I could pay.
Because Gene was all about solving problems, and your problem was twofold -- the massive existing canon made telling new stories nearly impossible especially if you're going to use the original crew, and there's no getting around the fact that pretty much everything has been covered already, either in the original work or the many spin-offs and movies which came after. The Star Trek Universe was stale.
Now it's a whole new palate, a whole new canvas for yourself or perhaps future Trek film makers to paint on, making the entire thing all new again.
My hat is off to you and all who worked on this film. Nice job. You've won a convert and a fan.
Carry on. Warp Speed.
Do you really think that J.J. Abrams knows who "Me" is?
He didn't hate them. He felt they stepped outside of canon too much. One example, in TWOK Checkov and Khan remember each other, but in ToS Checkov wasn't a member of the Enterprise crew when Khan was first encountered. They couldn't have remembered each other because, they never met.As for Gene's opinion, I kinda stopped caring what he thought after I read up on the behind the scenes stuff for Wrath of Khan and The Undiscovered Country. Those were arguably the best of the original crew's work, and Roddenberry hated them with a passion.
We have to defer to his late wife on that...He didn't hate them. He felt they stepped outside of canon too much. One example, in TWOK Checkov and Khan remember each other, but in ToS Checkov wasn't a member of the Enterprise crew when Khan was first encountered. They couldn't have remembered each other because, they never met.As for Gene's opinion, I kinda stopped caring what he thought after I read up on the behind the scenes stuff for Wrath of Khan and The Undiscovered Country. Those were arguably the best of the original crew's work, and Roddenberry hated them with a passion.
Yeah, that is a bad screw up. What I had heard, is that Roddenberry hated how Khan and Undiscovered Country had "militarized" Star Trek. He'd always thought of Star Trek as a kind of Space Western, and in Khan and Country, that isn't the feel of the show. I'd always heard that gripe about DS9 too (though in that case it wasn't Roddenberry, as he was gone, it was folks that claimed to know what Roddenberry would have liked).
I can imagine he probably wouldn't have liked the newest movie for much the same reason. Roddenberry tried hard to keep tight control over the "vision" of Star Trek. I can't imagine a reboot would have sat well with him.
Dr T is closer then you are about this.We have to defer to his late wife on that...He didn't hate them. He felt they stepped outside of canon too much. One example, in TWOK Checkov and Khan remember each other, but in ToS Checkov wasn't a member of the Enterprise crew when Khan was first encountered. They couldn't have remembered each other because, they never met.
Yeah, that is a bad screw up. What I had heard, is that Roddenberry hated how Khan and Undiscovered Country had "militarized" Star Trek. He'd always thought of Star Trek as a kind of Space Western, and in Khan and Country, that isn't the feel of the show. I'd always heard that gripe about DS9 too (though in that case it wasn't Roddenberry, as he was gone, it was folks that claimed to know what Roddenberry would have liked).
I can imagine he probably wouldn't have liked the newest movie for much the same reason. Roddenberry tried hard to keep tight control over the "vision" of Star Trek. I can't imagine a reboot would have sat well with him.
And the "militarization" in TWOK was actually Gene's idea... He wanted a submarine warfare-type scenario somewhat like "Balance of Terror" was, more of a nautical theme like the Hornblower stories. Hornblower being, the actual inspiration for everything Trek..
First of all, Bennett was only involved in 2, 3, 4 and 5, not "all of them from Khan forward" he had nothing at all to do with 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 and secondly, he said just this year in the special DVD feature "Star Trek: The Three Picture Saga" pretty much exactly what I posted. Yes Gene had some problems with ST6 and TWOK, and absolutely detested ST5, but none of it had to do with the supposed direction Paramount was taking or trying to take.Dr T is closer then you are about this.We have to defer to his late wife on that...Yeah, that is a bad screw up. What I had heard, is that Roddenberry hated how Khan and Undiscovered Country had "militarized" Star Trek. He'd always thought of Star Trek as a kind of Space Western, and in Khan and Country, that isn't the feel of the show. I'd always heard that gripe about DS9 too (though in that case it wasn't Roddenberry, as he was gone, it was folks that claimed to know what Roddenberry would have liked).
I can imagine he probably wouldn't have liked the newest movie for much the same reason. Roddenberry tried hard to keep tight control over the "vision" of Star Trek. I can't imagine a reboot would have sat well with him.
And the "militarization" in TWOK was actually Gene's idea... He wanted a submarine warfare-type scenario somewhat like "Balance of Terror" was, more of a nautical theme like the Hornblower stories. Hornblower being, the actual inspiration for everything Trek..
Harve Bennett (who produced all the Trek movies from Khan foward) talks about it on the DVD set for the movies. Gene HATED the direction the movies went in, Harve realized the material was a space going Horatio Hornblower and Gene wanted touchy feely liberalism, which shows in Star Trek the Next Generation's first two seasons. Both of those are chock full of that PC crap, it was only when his health failed that STTNG started to become a top show with season 3. Paramount did not let him do to the films what he ended up doing to the TV show (which debuded after ST IV).
As for the movies, Gene had little to do with them outside of the absolute worst one, which was ST the motion picture.
TO: J.J. Abrams
FROM: Me
STARDATE: 2009.1119
SUBJECT: Star Trek
Okay, I got the DVD and watched it and all of the special features. Being a life long ST fan, I had to at least see for myself what you have done.
I skipped this movie at the theater, because from what I saw as a long time editor of the Star Trek Wiki I didn't think I would like it. I objected to your destroying of the canon, and really felt the time travel plot device and the "Evil Renegade Romulan" have been way overused in Star Trek.
Everything Star Trek before your movie is still canon, but now canon of an alternate timeline. I get that, actually got it a year before the movie came out. Accepting it was the problem.
But after watching your movie, only one thought came to mind: Gene Roddenberry somewhere was smiling. Gene, wherever he is, approves. I really believe that. And I hope that to you, it's the best complement I could pay.
Because Gene was all about solving problems, and your problem was twofold -- the massive existing canon made telling new stories nearly impossible especially if you're going to use the original crew, and there's no getting around the fact that pretty much everything has been covered already, either in the original work or the many spin-offs and movies which came after. The Star Trek Universe was stale.
Now it's a whole new palate, a whole new canvas for yourself or perhaps future Trek film makers to paint on, making the entire thing all new again.
My hat is off to you and all who worked on this film. Nice job. You've won a convert and a fan.
Carry on. Warp Speed.
You are trying to split hairs.First of all, Bennett was only involved in 2, 3, 4 and 5, not "all of them from Khan forward" he had nothing at all to do with 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 and secondly, he said just this year in the special DVD feature "Star Trek: The Three Picture Saga" pretty much exactly what I posted. Yes Gene had some problems with ST6 and TWOK, and absolutely detested ST5, but none of it had to do with the supposed direction Paramount was taking or trying to take.Dr T is closer then you are about this.We have to defer to his late wife on that...
And the "militarization" in TWOK was actually Gene's idea... He wanted a submarine warfare-type scenario somewhat like "Balance of Terror" was, more of a nautical theme like the Hornblower stories. Hornblower being, the actual inspiration for everything Trek..
Harve Bennett (who produced all the Trek movies from Khan foward) talks about it on the DVD set for the movies. Gene HATED the direction the movies went in, Harve realized the material was a space going Horatio Hornblower and Gene wanted touchy feely liberalism, which shows in Star Trek the Next Generation's first two seasons. Both of those are chock full of that PC crap, it was only when his health failed that STTNG started to become a top show with season 3. Paramount did not let him do to the films what he ended up doing to the TV show (which debuded after ST IV).
As for the movies, Gene had little to do with them outside of the absolute worst one, which was ST the motion picture.
TNG was never a "top show" it was always syndicated with spotty ratings, as were all of the ST shows thereafter. ("Great" syndication ratings that never even touched the ratings of TOS by the way.)
What "saved" TNG starting in season 3 was the Borg, and if you'll look more closely you'll see the series still stayed with "all the PC crap" even to the most recent incarnation. It just wasn't noticed as much.
One thing about Gene that remained constant was, he was known to change his opinions constantly. So since he is not here today we have to take his late widow's word for it, Gene would have liked this film.
Gene Roddenberry - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaStar Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country was the last film with the cast of the original Star Trek series and was dedicated to Roddenberry. He reportedly viewed an early version of the film a few days before his death. In his book Star Trek Movie Memories, William Shatner clams that after Roddenberry viewed the film in a private screening, he promptly drafted a list of changes he wanted made, but by the time his attorney submitted that list, Roddenberry himself had died.
again,Roddenberry was deeply involved with creating and producing Star Trek: The Next Generation, although he only had full control over the show's first season. The WGA strike of 1988 prevented him from taking an active role in production of the second season and forced him to hand control of the series to producer Maurice Hurley. While Roddenberry was free to resume work on the third season, his health was in serious decline, and over the course of the season, he gradually ceded control to Rick Berman and Michael Pille.
Shit.....I'm gonna have to see it now, huh?
DYK that Gene was banging her and Nurse Chappel at the same time?
i cant rep you anymore EZ or you would have gotten one for this....
TNG was never a "top show" it was always syndicated with spotty ratings, as were all of the ST shows thereafter. ("Great" syndication ratings that never even touched the ratings of TOS by the way.)
What "saved" TNG starting in season 3 was the Borg, and if you'll look more closely you'll see the series still stayed with "all the PC crap" even to the most recent incarnation. It just wasn't noticed as much.
Shit.....I'm gonna have to see it now, huh?
Makes two of us.