Shusha
Gold Member
- Dec 14, 2015
- 13,270
- 2,294
- 290
- Thread starter
- #121
There is absolutely no fundamental difference between that insanity, and this idea that somehow Jerusalem should be controlled by any other country or group of countries, or United Nations of countries, than the nation of Israel alone.
Sure there is. Arabs have lived in Jerusalem for a really, really long time. You can't just ignore that fact. The question on the table is how to practically deal with that fact.
Correct.
In fact, Arabs have lived in Jerusalem for over 5000 years before the Hebrew invasion around 1000 BC.
The Palestinian Arabs are the Akkadians, Urites, Chaldeans, Canaanites, Philistines, Phoenicians, Nabatians, Amorites, etc.
And they were the only ones who never left.
You are just the master of fake history, aren't you? Intentionally falsified to deny Jewish indigneity.
You render cultural and ethnic designations meaningless. What is a Canaanite? How can you tell that they are Canaanite? A Phoenician? An Amorite? How can you differentiate these people, one from another?
What is a Jew? How do you know?
What is an Arab? How do you know?
The Jewish people have lived on that territory for thousands of years. As Jews. They were invaded, conquered, colonized, cleansed, culturally erased, converted and genocided in successive waves by foreign people. They never "left". There were always those who stayed. Those who were forced from the territory retained their culture and identity and their ties to the territory.
As indigenous peoples, the Jewish people have every legal and moral claim to part of that territory. You trying to weasel around and deny them is reprehensible.