- Thread starter
- #181
Once again this article never got around to putting a sound mathematical footing on Climate Change and explains how people like the IPCC might have fooled around with the data.OK, since nobody is contesting IanC and SSDD I will go ahead and assume that, as far as I can tell, it seems there is at most very little involvement of man in climate change.
Of course, AGW also includes nuclear bombs and I wonder about the magnetic poles shifting. Maybe we can talk about them if you want to keep the thread going.
You should really keep an open mind. A lot of the posters here really stray away from science and get their "theorys" from blogs. This forum is not the place to form an opinion.
This is one of the best explanations of the green house effect that I've seen.
Simple Models of Climate
Current understanding begins at the paragraph next to Fourier's picture. It starts with
How does the Earth’s blanket of air impede the outgoing heat radiation?
The article doesn't require much physics knowledge, but it is long and not an easy read.