No charges of obstruction were made, dumbass.
These weasels are just repeating the same theories the Dims have been beating their chests about for the last couple of months. The Dims probably consulted them before they started this impeachment jihad.
Lying fucking moron, I didn't say they were.
Great, let's see your evidence they broke the law...LOLOLSCHIFF OBTAINED PHONE RECORDS OF NUNES, JOURNALIST, OTHERS
This is shocking:
“Adam Schiff Has Crossed a Line: He’s Obtained Phone Records of Devin Nunes, Nunes’ Aide, Rudy Giuliani and John Solomon.” The most stunning aspect of the report was the inclusion of telephone records of House Intelligence Committee ranking member.Presumably such records were obtained through legal process, as opposed to computer hacking or bribery of telephone company employees. Offhand, however, I don’t know what the legal basis would be for obtaining these phone records, and Schiff’s refusal to comment does not inspire confidence. I also don’t understand how Schiff could have obtained these records–legally–without the knowledge of the ranking member of his committee, Devin Nunes.
John Solomon has been one of the best reporters on the subjects at issue here, and spying on his phone records reminds one of when Sharyl Attkisson’s home computer was intruded on at a time when her reporting was inconvenient for the Obama administration.
Schiff has crossed the line of decency with this move. Once again, he has abused his power. This is an abuse of the constitutional rights of all spied on. These are KGB tactics.
Now Republicans should obtain Schiff’s phone records, those of the so-called whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, and the colleague with whom he had a “bro-like” relationship, Sean Misko, the one Schiff hired as an aide the day after the whistleblower’s complaint was submitted.
The repellent Adam Schiff has managed to reach a new level of depravity.
Schiff’s depravity is unprecedented, but, we saw previews of it during the Obama administration.
Obtaining phone records is an abuse of power but getting a foreign leader to dig up dirt on a political rival is not??
Dayum, you rightards sure are brain-dead.
If they break the law trying to attack the president, they are accountable to that. We let a lot of people get away with a lot of stuff because we don't follow the law when prosecuting them.
Now you're trying to distance yourself from your own dumbass theories. You said "it did say there was a ton of Obstruction by Rump." If that's irrelevant, then why did you bring it up?Lying fucking moron, I didn't say they were.
Actually, I asked a brain-dead con how obtaining records is an abuse of power. I didn't assert that it was. Some reading comprehension would do you wonders.Great, let's see your evidence they broke the law...LOLOLSCHIFF OBTAINED PHONE RECORDS OF NUNES, JOURNALIST, OTHERS
This is shocking:
“Adam Schiff Has Crossed a Line: He’s Obtained Phone Records of Devin Nunes, Nunes’ Aide, Rudy Giuliani and John Solomon.” The most stunning aspect of the report was the inclusion of telephone records of House Intelligence Committee ranking member.Presumably such records were obtained through legal process, as opposed to computer hacking or bribery of telephone company employees. Offhand, however, I don’t know what the legal basis would be for obtaining these phone records, and Schiff’s refusal to comment does not inspire confidence. I also don’t understand how Schiff could have obtained these records–legally–without the knowledge of the ranking member of his committee, Devin Nunes.
John Solomon has been one of the best reporters on the subjects at issue here, and spying on his phone records reminds one of when Sharyl Attkisson’s home computer was intruded on at a time when her reporting was inconvenient for the Obama administration.
Schiff has crossed the line of decency with this move. Once again, he has abused his power. This is an abuse of the constitutional rights of all spied on. These are KGB tactics.
Now Republicans should obtain Schiff’s phone records, those of the so-called whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, and the colleague with whom he had a “bro-like” relationship, Sean Misko, the one Schiff hired as an aide the day after the whistleblower’s complaint was submitted.
The repellent Adam Schiff has managed to reach a new level of depravity.
Schiff’s depravity is unprecedented, but, we saw previews of it during the Obama administration.
Obtaining phone records is an abuse of power but getting a foreign leader to dig up dirt on a political rival is not??
Dayum, you rightards sure are brain-dead.
If they break the law trying to attack the president, they are accountable to that. We let a lot of people get away with a lot of stuff because we don't follow the law when prosecuting them.
I was just working with what you gave me. You assumed in your post that Schiff obtaining phone records was an "abuse of power", so I did as well in my response. Did you not intend to do that?
The bottom line remains, moreover, that trying to "get" Trump is not such a noble goal as to excuse extra legal manuvering, and it is certainly justified to scrutinize Schiff's actions in this regard. In fact, removing a president is a momentous enough event as to require extreme precision and the highest of evidentiary standards. Second hand knowledge, suppositions and opinions do not rise to that level. If, for example, the president is accused of demanding something in exchange for aid, but the "victim" says it didn't happen, that's a big deficit to overcome, and "I hate Trump and automatically assume he's guilty of every accusation" isn't enough.
Lol where’s Mueller at, carnival barker?Actually, I asked a brain-dead con how obtaining records is an abuse of power. I didn't assert that it was. Some reading comprehension would do you wonders.Great, let's see your evidence they broke the law...LOLOLSCHIFF OBTAINED PHONE RECORDS OF NUNES, JOURNALIST, OTHERS
This is shocking:
“Adam Schiff Has Crossed a Line: He’s Obtained Phone Records of Devin Nunes, Nunes’ Aide, Rudy Giuliani and John Solomon.” The most stunning aspect of the report was the inclusion of telephone records of House Intelligence Committee ranking member.Presumably such records were obtained through legal process, as opposed to computer hacking or bribery of telephone company employees. Offhand, however, I don’t know what the legal basis would be for obtaining these phone records, and Schiff’s refusal to comment does not inspire confidence. I also don’t understand how Schiff could have obtained these records–legally–without the knowledge of the ranking member of his committee, Devin Nunes.
John Solomon has been one of the best reporters on the subjects at issue here, and spying on his phone records reminds one of when Sharyl Attkisson’s home computer was intruded on at a time when her reporting was inconvenient for the Obama administration.
Schiff has crossed the line of decency with this move. Once again, he has abused his power. This is an abuse of the constitutional rights of all spied on. These are KGB tactics.
Now Republicans should obtain Schiff’s phone records, those of the so-called whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, and the colleague with whom he had a “bro-like” relationship, Sean Misko, the one Schiff hired as an aide the day after the whistleblower’s complaint was submitted.
The repellent Adam Schiff has managed to reach a new level of depravity.
Schiff’s depravity is unprecedented, but, we saw previews of it during the Obama administration.
Obtaining phone records is an abuse of power but getting a foreign leader to dig up dirt on a political rival is not??
Dayum, you rightards sure are brain-dead.
If they break the law trying to attack the president, they are accountable to that. We let a lot of people get away with a lot of stuff because we don't follow the law when prosecuting them.
I was just working with what you gave me. You assumed in your post that Schiff obtaining phone records was an "abuse of power", so I did as well in my response. Did you not intend to do that?
The bottom line remains, moreover, that trying to "get" Trump is not such a noble goal as to excuse extra legal manuvering, and it is certainly justified to scrutinize Schiff's actions in this regard. In fact, removing a president is a momentous enough event as to require extreme precision and the highest of evidentiary standards. Second hand knowledge, suppositions and opinions do not rise to that level. If, for example, the president is accused of demanding something in exchange for aid, but the "victim" says it didn't happen, that's a big deficit to overcome, and "I hate Trump and automatically assume he's guilty of every accusation" isn't enough.
It's a violation of the 4th Amendment, moron.Actually, I asked a brain-dead con how obtaining records is an abuse of power. I didn't assert that it was. Some reading comprehension would do you wonders.Great, let's see your evidence they broke the law...LOLOLSCHIFF OBTAINED PHONE RECORDS OF NUNES, JOURNALIST, OTHERS
This is shocking:
“Adam Schiff Has Crossed a Line: He’s Obtained Phone Records of Devin Nunes, Nunes’ Aide, Rudy Giuliani and John Solomon.” The most stunning aspect of the report was the inclusion of telephone records of House Intelligence Committee ranking member.Presumably such records were obtained through legal process, as opposed to computer hacking or bribery of telephone company employees. Offhand, however, I don’t know what the legal basis would be for obtaining these phone records, and Schiff’s refusal to comment does not inspire confidence. I also don’t understand how Schiff could have obtained these records–legally–without the knowledge of the ranking member of his committee, Devin Nunes.
John Solomon has been one of the best reporters on the subjects at issue here, and spying on his phone records reminds one of when Sharyl Attkisson’s home computer was intruded on at a time when her reporting was inconvenient for the Obama administration.
Schiff has crossed the line of decency with this move. Once again, he has abused his power. This is an abuse of the constitutional rights of all spied on. These are KGB tactics.
Now Republicans should obtain Schiff’s phone records, those of the so-called whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, and the colleague with whom he had a “bro-like” relationship, Sean Misko, the one Schiff hired as an aide the day after the whistleblower’s complaint was submitted.
The repellent Adam Schiff has managed to reach a new level of depravity.
Schiff’s depravity is unprecedented, but, we saw previews of it during the Obama administration.
Obtaining phone records is an abuse of power but getting a foreign leader to dig up dirt on a political rival is not??
Dayum, you rightards sure are brain-dead.
If they break the law trying to attack the president, they are accountable to that. We let a lot of people get away with a lot of stuff because we don't follow the law when prosecuting them.
I was just working with what you gave me. You assumed in your post that Schiff obtaining phone records was an "abuse of power", so I did as well in my response. Did you not intend to do that?
The bottom line remains, moreover, that trying to "get" Trump is not such a noble goal as to excuse extra legal manuvering, and it is certainly justified to scrutinize Schiff's actions in this regard. In fact, removing a president is a momentous enough event as to require extreme precision and the highest of evidentiary standards. Second hand knowledge, suppositions and opinions do not rise to that level. If, for example, the president is accused of demanding something in exchange for aid, but the "victim" says it didn't happen, that's a big deficit to overcome, and "I hate Trump and automatically assume he's guilty of every accusation" isn't enough.
Why are you asking me?Lol where’s Mueller at, carnival barker?Actually, I asked a brain-dead con how obtaining records is an abuse of power. I didn't assert that it was. Some reading comprehension would do you wonders.Great, let's see your evidence they broke the law...LOLOL
Obtaining phone records is an abuse of power but getting a foreign leader to dig up dirt on a political rival is not??
Dayum, you rightards sure are brain-dead.
If they break the law trying to attack the president, they are accountable to that. We let a lot of people get away with a lot of stuff because we don't follow the law when prosecuting them.
I was just working with what you gave me. You assumed in your post that Schiff obtaining phone records was an "abuse of power", so I did as well in my response. Did you not intend to do that?
The bottom line remains, moreover, that trying to "get" Trump is not such a noble goal as to excuse extra legal manuvering, and it is certainly justified to scrutinize Schiff's actions in this regard. In fact, removing a president is a momentous enough event as to require extreme precision and the highest of evidentiary standards. Second hand knowledge, suppositions and opinions do not rise to that level. If, for example, the president is accused of demanding something in exchange for aid, but the "victim" says it didn't happen, that's a big deficit to overcome, and "I hate Trump and automatically assume he's guilty of every accusation" isn't enough.
Actually, I asked a brain-dead con how obtaining records is an abuse of power. I didn't assert that it was. Some reading comprehension would do you wonders.Great, let's see your evidence they broke the law...LOLOLSCHIFF OBTAINED PHONE RECORDS OF NUNES, JOURNALIST, OTHERS
This is shocking:
“Adam Schiff Has Crossed a Line: He’s Obtained Phone Records of Devin Nunes, Nunes’ Aide, Rudy Giuliani and John Solomon.” The most stunning aspect of the report was the inclusion of telephone records of House Intelligence Committee ranking member.Presumably such records were obtained through legal process, as opposed to computer hacking or bribery of telephone company employees. Offhand, however, I don’t know what the legal basis would be for obtaining these phone records, and Schiff’s refusal to comment does not inspire confidence. I also don’t understand how Schiff could have obtained these records–legally–without the knowledge of the ranking member of his committee, Devin Nunes.
John Solomon has been one of the best reporters on the subjects at issue here, and spying on his phone records reminds one of when Sharyl Attkisson’s home computer was intruded on at a time when her reporting was inconvenient for the Obama administration.
Schiff has crossed the line of decency with this move. Once again, he has abused his power. This is an abuse of the constitutional rights of all spied on. These are KGB tactics.
Now Republicans should obtain Schiff’s phone records, those of the so-called whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, and the colleague with whom he had a “bro-like” relationship, Sean Misko, the one Schiff hired as an aide the day after the whistleblower’s complaint was submitted.
The repellent Adam Schiff has managed to reach a new level of depravity.
Schiff’s depravity is unprecedented, but, we saw previews of it during the Obama administration.
Obtaining phone records is an abuse of power but getting a foreign leader to dig up dirt on a political rival is not??
Dayum, you rightards sure are brain-dead.
If they break the law trying to attack the president, they are accountable to that. We let a lot of people get away with a lot of stuff because we don't follow the law when prosecuting them.
I was just working with what you gave me. You assumed in your post that Schiff obtaining phone records was an "abuse of power", so I did as well in my response. Did you not intend to do that?
The bottom line remains, moreover, that trying to "get" Trump is not such a noble goal as to excuse extra legal manuvering, and it is certainly justified to scrutinize Schiff's actions in this regard. In fact, removing a president is a momentous enough event as to require extreme precision and the highest of evidentiary standards. Second hand knowledge, suppositions and opinions do not rise to that level. If, for example, the president is accused of demanding something in exchange for aid, but the "victim" says it didn't happen, that's a big deficit to overcome, and "I hate Trump and automatically assume he's guilty of every accusation" isn't enough.
Not if the records were legally obtained, ya lying fucking moron.It's a violation of the 4th Amendment, moron.Actually, I asked a brain-dead con how obtaining records is an abuse of power. I didn't assert that it was. Some reading comprehension would do you wonders.Great, let's see your evidence they broke the law...LOLOL
Obtaining phone records is an abuse of power but getting a foreign leader to dig up dirt on a political rival is not??
Dayum, you rightards sure are brain-dead.
If they break the law trying to attack the president, they are accountable to that. We let a lot of people get away with a lot of stuff because we don't follow the law when prosecuting them.
I was just working with what you gave me. You assumed in your post that Schiff obtaining phone records was an "abuse of power", so I did as well in my response. Did you not intend to do that?
The bottom line remains, moreover, that trying to "get" Trump is not such a noble goal as to excuse extra legal manuvering, and it is certainly justified to scrutinize Schiff's actions in this regard. In fact, removing a president is a momentous enough event as to require extreme precision and the highest of evidentiary standards. Second hand knowledge, suppositions and opinions do not rise to that level. If, for example, the president is accused of demanding something in exchange for aid, but the "victim" says it didn't happen, that's a big deficit to overcome, and "I hate Trump and automatically assume he's guilty of every accusation" isn't enough.
When he can produce a legal warrant, then he's off the hook. Otherwise, he's guilty of violating the 4th Amendment.
She sure made a lot of good points. Ugly is the best you can do to refute them?
LOLNow you're trying to distance yourself from your own dumbass theories. You said "it did say there was a ton of Obstruction by Rump." If that's irrelevant, then why did you bring it up?Lying fucking moron, I didn't say they were.
I quoted it directly from your post, moron.LOLNow you're trying to distance yourself from your own dumbass theories. You said "it did say there was a ton of Obstruction by Rump." If that's irrelevant, then why did you bring it up?Lying fucking moron, I didn't say they were.
I never said that, lying fucking moron.
