Obama's Middle East Plan: Destabilize, Disperse, Destroy

[Lucy Hamilton]

Just out of curiosity, have you ever been accused of being an easily predictable partisan hack?

Can't defend your messiah, can you?

He isn't my messiah. He is my president. Which just infuriates bitter, frothing-at-the-mouth old men like you. But, you and your ilk are dying off and you all will be dead soon.

My "ilk" are people who love freedom. You ilk are servile people who worship at the feet of an autocrat. You inability to see any of his numerous flaws proves he is your messiah.

"You inability to see any of his numerous flaws proves he is your messiah."

It's illustrative of the full-on Kool-Aid drinkers.

The assumptions you two make are quite entertaining; completely wrong, but entertaining.

Now, I have to get back to reality, but you two may carry on the rest of the day posting to the internet and changing the world. I'll stop back when I get a break for a chuckle.

 

[Weatherman2020]

It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it

It's not just Obama, it's the whole establishment.

Did you see Obama's most recent correspondents dinner? The entire establishment was invited. What the hell was "Reince" Priebus doing there?

Even Trump was invited. Trump didn't show up this time though. Gee, I wonder why.

This policy was in place well before Obama. It's called the Project for a New (or Greater) Middle East.



brzezinski | The New Middle East Project

The 4th Media » Plans for Redrawing the Middle East: The Project for a “New Middle East”

The fact is, both establishment Republicans and Democrats have the same foreign policy because they are funded by the military-industrial-complex. It's about making money and taking away the people's civil rights and liberties. It's all political rhetoric that is completely the same today as it was back then. Things never change because the elites all crave power and money.

They don't give a shit about the American people.




Syria and Libya were next up no matter who won the election. And if they hadn't been successful in covertly assassinating President Chavez, the CIA might have continued beefing up the assistance to Columbia to overthrow him with narco-rebels. It wouldn't have made a damn bit of difference if it had been Obama or Romney, the same policies would have prevailed. The Deep State always gets what it desires.

. Ok, but then add a sympathizer president like Barak Hussein Obama to the mix, and it revealed a whole new ideology and position to be taken on it all. Now was he fighting against Islamic extremism as previous administration's were or was he Obama actually aiding and abetting it ? There is a difference, and so it just depends on the positions or the ideologies of the players that sit down at the table.

You are making the tacit assumption that what you see and hear about this administration and the last administration from your MSM news sources, are, in fact, the truth.

Dispense with that illusion forth with.

The Bush administration was not, "fighting Islamic extremism." It only made up a pretense in the public eye to do so. It had always been allied with Saudi Arabia, ALWAYS. If you don't believe me, search the history of what planes were flying when every plane was grounded right after 9/11, and who was aboard those flights.

Those pages are damning to the Saudis. The Saudis fund terrorists, and we fund the Saudis. It is as simple as that.

Why does Obama not want those 28 redacted pages of the 9/11 commission report released? Remember who censored those pages in the first place, eh?


To say the Obama admin defends and supports terror and the last one doesn't is to just admit you don't pay attention to what is going on in the world.

Do tell us why Obama is allied with Saudi Arabia and refuses to declassify the 28 pages.

 

[BluesLegend]

The guy is a BS artist with no resume and no experience, hence the giant mess he made was predictable from the get go.

 

[MisterBeale]

It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it

It's not just Obama, it's the whole establishment.

Did you see Obama's most recent correspondents dinner? The entire establishment was invited. What the hell was "Reince" Priebus doing there?

Even Trump was invited. Trump didn't show up this time though. Gee, I wonder why.

This policy was in place well before Obama. It's called the Project for a New (or Greater) Middle East.



brzezinski | The New Middle East Project

The 4th Media » Plans for Redrawing the Middle East: The Project for a “New Middle East”

The fact is, both establishment Republicans and Democrats have the same foreign policy because they are funded by the military-industrial-complex. It's about making money and taking away the people's civil rights and liberties. It's all political rhetoric that is completely the same today as it was back then. Things never change because the elites all crave power and money.

They don't give a shit about the American people.




Syria and Libya were next up no matter who won the election. And if they hadn't been successful in covertly assassinating President Chavez, the CIA might have continued beefing up the assistance to Columbia to overthrow him with narco-rebels. It wouldn't have made a damn bit of difference if it had been Obama or Romney, the same policies would have prevailed. The Deep State always gets what it desires.

. Ok, but then add a sympathizer president like Barak Hussein Obama to the mix, and it revealed a whole new ideology and position to be taken on it all. Now was he fighting against Islamic extremism as previous administration's were or was he Obama actually aiding and abetting it ? There is a difference, and so it just depends on the positions or the ideologies of the players that sit down at the table.

You are making the tacit assumption that what you see and hear about this administration and the last administration from your MSM news sources, are, in fact, the truth.

Dispense with that illusion forth with.

The Bush administration was not, "fighting Islamic extremism." It only made up a pretense in the public eye to do so. It had always been allied with Saudi Arabia, ALWAYS. If you don't believe me, search the history of what planes were flying when every plane was grounded right after 9/11, and who was aboard those flights.

Those pages are damning to the Saudis. The Saudis fund terrorists, and we fund the Saudis. It is as simple as that.

Why does Obama not want those 28 redacted pages of the 9/11 commission report released? Remember who censored those pages in the first place, eh?


To say the Obama admin defends and supports terror and the last one doesn't is to just admit you don't pay attention to what is going on in the world.

Do tell us why Obama is allied with Saudi Arabia and refuses to declassify the 28 pages.

Read the entire thread and educate yourself.

Saudis threatens US over 9/11 bill in Congress.

 

[Weatherman2020]

It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it

It's not just Obama, it's the whole establishment.

Did you see Obama's most recent correspondents dinner? The entire establishment was invited. What the hell was "Reince" Priebus doing there?

Even Trump was invited. Trump didn't show up this time though. Gee, I wonder why.

This policy was in place well before Obama. It's called the Project for a New (or Greater) Middle East.



brzezinski | The New Middle East Project

The 4th Media » Plans for Redrawing the Middle East: The Project for a “New Middle East”

The fact is, both establishment Republicans and Democrats have the same foreign policy because they are funded by the military-industrial-complex. It's about making money and taking away the people's civil rights and liberties. It's all political rhetoric that is completely the same today as it was back then. Things never change because the elites all crave power and money.

They don't give a shit about the American people.




Syria and Libya were next up no matter who won the election. And if they hadn't been successful in covertly assassinating President Chavez, the CIA might have continued beefing up the assistance to Columbia to overthrow him with narco-rebels. It wouldn't have made a damn bit of difference if it had been Obama or Romney, the same policies would have prevailed. The Deep State always gets what it desires.

. Ok, but then add a sympathizer president like Barak Hussein Obama to the mix, and it revealed a whole new ideology and position to be taken on it all. Now was he fighting against Islamic extremism as previous administration's were or was he Obama actually aiding and abetting it ? There is a difference, and so it just depends on the positions or the ideologies of the players that sit down at the table.

You are making the tacit assumption that what you see and hear about this administration and the last administration from your MSM news sources, are, in fact, the truth.

Dispense with that illusion forth with.

The Bush administration was not, "fighting Islamic extremism." It only made up a pretense in the public eye to do so. It had always been allied with Saudi Arabia, ALWAYS. If you don't believe me, search the history of what planes were flying when every plane was grounded right after 9/11, and who was aboard those flights.

Those pages are damning to the Saudis. The Saudis fund terrorists, and we fund the Saudis. It is as simple as that.

Why does Obama not want those 28 redacted pages of the 9/11 commission report released? Remember who censored those pages in the first place, eh?


To say the Obama admin defends and supports terror and the last one doesn't is to just admit you don't pay attention to what is going on in the world.

Do tell us why Obama is allied with Saudi Arabia and refuses to declassify the 28 pages.

Read the entire thread and educate yourself.

Saudis threatens US over 9/11 bill in Congress.

So Obama has been blackmailed by the Saudi's or he is just protecting the Saudis?

Which one?

 

[MisterBeale]

It's not just Obama, it's the whole establishment.

Did you see Obama's most recent correspondents dinner? The entire establishment was invited. What the hell was "Reince" Priebus doing there?

Even Trump was invited. Trump didn't show up this time though. Gee, I wonder why.

This policy was in place well before Obama. It's called the Project for a New (or Greater) Middle East.



brzezinski | The New Middle East Project

The 4th Media » Plans for Redrawing the Middle East: The Project for a “New Middle East”

The fact is, both establishment Republicans and Democrats have the same foreign policy because they are funded by the military-industrial-complex. It's about making money and taking away the people's civil rights and liberties. It's all political rhetoric that is completely the same today as it was back then. Things never change because the elites all crave power and money.

They don't give a shit about the American people.




Syria and Libya were next up no matter who won the election. And if they hadn't been successful in covertly assassinating President Chavez, the CIA might have continued beefing up the assistance to Columbia to overthrow him with narco-rebels. It wouldn't have made a damn bit of difference if it had been Obama or Romney, the same policies would have prevailed. The Deep State always gets what it desires.

. Ok, but then add a sympathizer president like Barak Hussein Obama to the mix, and it revealed a whole new ideology and position to be taken on it all. Now was he fighting against Islamic extremism as previous administration's were or was he Obama actually aiding and abetting it ? There is a difference, and so it just depends on the positions or the ideologies of the players that sit down at the table.

You are making the tacit assumption that what you see and hear about this administration and the last administration from your MSM news sources, are, in fact, the truth.

Dispense with that illusion forth with.

The Bush administration was not, "fighting Islamic extremism." It only made up a pretense in the public eye to do so. It had always been allied with Saudi Arabia, ALWAYS. If you don't believe me, search the history of what planes were flying when every plane was grounded right after 9/11, and who was aboard those flights.

Those pages are damning to the Saudis. The Saudis fund terrorists, and we fund the Saudis. It is as simple as that.

Why does Obama not want those 28 redacted pages of the 9/11 commission report released? Remember who censored those pages in the first place, eh?


To say the Obama admin defends and supports terror and the last one doesn't is to just admit you don't pay attention to what is going on in the world.

Do tell us why Obama is allied with Saudi Arabia and refuses to declassify the 28 pages.

Read the entire thread and educate yourself.

Saudis threatens US over 9/11 bill in Congress.

So Obama has been blackmailed by the Saudi's or he is just protecting the Saudis?

Which one?

Neither. Stop being so simple minded.

It works, sort of like the Safari Club.

It has to do with the Deep State. There are financial and powerful interests involved here. Obama is just a pawn. It wouldn't matter if it were Hillary or Ted Cruz. It is in the interest of the ruling class to keep you in the dark about these things silly.

Who Are We at War With? That’s Classified
Who Are We at War With? That’s Classified

President Obama has repeatedly said the U.S. is targeting Al Qaeda and “associated forces.” But the government won’t say who those forces are. (STAFF/AFP/Getty Images)

The law underpinning the U.S. war against Al Qaeda is known as the Authorization for Use of Military Force, or AUMF, and it was passed one week after the 9/11 attacks. It doesn’t actually include the words “associated forces,” though courts and Congress have endorsed the phrase.


As we explained earlier this year, the emergence of new or more loosely-aligned terrorist groups has legal scholars wondering how effectively the U.S. will be able to “shoehorn” them into the AUMF. During the May hearing, many lawmakers expressed concern about the Pentagon’s capacious reading of the law. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., described it as a “carte blanche.”

Essay: Anatomy of the Deep State
Essay: Anatomy of the Deep State | BillMoyers.com

 

[pwjohn]

It's clear now that Obama fully intended to destabilize as much of the Middle East as possible: Syria, Libya, Iraq are all clusterfucks and no, it's not Bush's Fault. Bush turned over a civil stable Iraq to Macaca Joe who couldn't wait to draw down US forces and turn Iraq over to Val Jarrett's ISIS and AQ Lieutenants.

So between Syria, Libya and Iraq (couldn't quit destroy Egypt) we have millions of "refugees", many legitimate, some clearly Jihadists fleeing into the EU and the USA.

Was it Obama's Plan, well actually, I mean whoever gives Obama his orders: Soros, the Elites, Val Jarrett -- to create the mess we see today?

It looks intentional to me. What say you?

Wait Libs will say, But but but but but Boooooooooooooosh. But again, Iraq was civil and stable when Macaca Joe inherited it

Well, lets face facts here. Fifteen years worth of buttfuckers like you bombing the middle east went a long way towards driving third world arab muslim shit hole people from their homes and straight into Europe. And here too.