From ' Dreams from My Father'
"One night I took her to see a new play by a black playwright. It was a very angry play, but very funny. Typical black American humor. The audience was mostly black, and everybody was laughing and clapping and hollering like they were in church. After the play was over, my friend started talking about why black people were so angry all the time. I said it was a matter of remembering—nobody asks why Jews remember the Holocaust, I think I said—and she said that’s different, and I said it wasn’t, and she said that anger was just a dead end. We had a big fight, right in front of the theater. When we got back to the car she started crying. She couldn’t be black, she said. She would if she could, but she couldn’t. She could only be herself, and wasn’t that enough."
Obama:
“That was not her,” he said. “That was an example of compression I was very sensitive in my book not to write about my girlfriends, partly out of respect for them. So that was a consideration. I thought that [the anecdote involving the reaction of a white girlfriend to the angry black play] was a useful theme to make about sort of the interactions that I had in the relationships with white girlfriends. And so, that occupies, what, two paragraphs in the book? My attitude was it would be dishonest for me not to touch on that at all … so that was an example of sort of editorially how do I figure that out?”"
Jeez... is there anything about this man that is "real"?
This appears to be from a Politico blog post:
Obama: 'New York girlfriend' was composite - POLITICO.com
I saw the post, and found it shockingly poorly-done. The author of the piece seems to claim that Obama has confessed to inventing a composite character that purported to be a real person he had known. In fact, of course, "Dreams from My Father" declares in the preface that composite characters are used. This Politico reporter is incorrectly reporting that Obama committed what I would consider serious wrongdoing and this could have been avoided if the reporter had done any of the following:
1) Skimmed the preface of the book on which he was reporting.
2) Skimmed the Wikipedia entry of the book, which has a chart relating made-up names to real people and also mentions the use of composites explicitly.
3) Waited for someone who had read the book to comment on the story.
4) googled "Dreams from My Father" and "composite"
Then, when someone apparently told the reporter that the book mentioned the use of composites, the reporter "updated" his story to say that "the reissue" of the book admitted the use of composites, implying that Obama had indeed lied-- he'd merely been forced to admit it. It apparently wasn't until someone commented on this "update" that the reporter or his editor finally issued a correction admitting that the book had always mentioned composites.
I'm not saying the reporter in question should resign, but I don't see much difference between this and an incident that led to the resignation of a WaPo blogger:
Elizabeth Flock’s resignation: The Post fails a young blogger - The Washington Post