skookerasbil
Platinum Member
lol.....even big players in the DUM camp say that the idea if "President Pence" is akin to unicorn chasing.
Only the true suckers give that any credence.
Being a sucker is ghey

Being a sucker is ghey
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
First, no one has shown any evidence Russia hacked the emails. You need to do that before you can make a case for collusion and after 7 months, you haven't shown any evidence of either.Russia released damaging emails against Hillary and Trump used those emails on a weekly basis to slam Hillary......Yes, that constitutes help
Second, you're crying "foul" because she was exposed. Instead of bitching about her being caught, you should be pissed off at Hillary for her corruption. You think like a criminal.
Get a better candidate next time instead of bitching about yours being exposed for her corruption. You're trying to make Trump responsible for her crimes. You don't have shit.
I like how you declined to address my other points.First, no one has shown any evidence Russia hacked the emails. You need to do that before you can make a case for collusion and after 7 months, you haven't shown any evidence of either.Russia released damaging emails against Hillary and Trump used those emails on a weekly basis to slam Hillary......Yes, that constitutes help
Second, you're crying "foul" because she was exposed. Instead of bitching about her being caught, you should be pissed off at Hillary for her corruption. You think like a criminal.
Get a better candidate next time instead of bitching about yours being exposed for her corruption. You're trying to make Trump responsible for her crimes. You don't have shit.
Just stop it
Your denials are becoming just plain silly. Yes there is evidence that Russia hacked the servers. It has been reported by the FBI, CIA and other intelligence agencies. The evidence has been provided to Congress. The evidence was briefed to both President Obama and President Trump who both accepted the conclusion that Russia hacked the DNC server
Your conclusion that just because classified information hasn't been released to some dimwitted message board poster, it must not exist is just plain stupid
I like how you declined to address my other points..First, no one has shown any evidence Russia hacked the emails. You need to do that before you can make a case for collusion and after 7 months, you haven't shown any evidence of either.Russia released damaging emails against Hillary and Trump used those emails on a weekly basis to slam Hillary......Yes, that constitutes help
Second, you're crying "foul" because she was exposed. Instead of bitching about her being caught, you should be pissed off at Hillary for her corruption. You think like a criminal.
Get a better candidate next time instead of bitching about yours being exposed for her corruption. You're trying to make Trump responsible for her crimes. You don't have shit.
Just stop it
Your denials are becoming just plain silly. Yes there is evidence that Russia hacked the servers. It has been reported by the FBI, CIA and other intelligence agencies. The evidence has been provided to Congress. The evidence was briefed to both President Obama and President Trump who both accepted the conclusion that Russia hacked the DNC server
Your conclusion that just because classified information hasn't been released to some dimwitted message board poster, it must not exist is just plain stupid
I do know democrats will never stop trying to remove all Republicans from positions of power and will never again accept a Republican as president. y.I don't expect it to end until everything has been completed. I do tire, though, of the incessant drumbeat from those absolutely certain Trump has committed some crime or other and that he'll be forced from office any day now.If he's actually guilty of a crime, prosecute him. I have no problem with that. Continuing to investigate hoping to find something, anything, however, IS a witch hunt.You guys have been investigating Hillary for 25 years
You found NOTHING....not even an indictment
Now you whimper like little Snowflakes if Trump gets investigated for nine months
<sob> Why isn't it over yet?
Wah...wah...wah....This is a witch hunt
You are kind of jumping the gun
Investigation is still ongoing. Why would you prosecute before you have collected all your evidence? Also, why would you release your evidence before all the principals have been interviewed
We have not even interviewed Flynn, Manafort, Sessions or Trump.....why would you expect the investigation to end?
Of course, should that happen, we'll get President Pence. I wonder how many of the anti-Trumpers believe Hillary will become president if Trump leaves?
No...they will then start on removing Pence from office as well...and Gorsuch too.......
I don't expect it to end until everything has been completed. I do tire, though, of the incessant drumbeat from those absolutely certain Trump has committed some crime or other and that he'll be forced from office any day now.If he's actually guilty of a crime, prosecute him. I have no problem with that. Continuing to investigate hoping to find something, anything, however, IS a witch hunt.Which is why you don't have reported contacts. No one is investigating her. I do not believe she had no contact with Russian officials, given that she was Sec State in the outgoing administration and already knew who to work with.The FBI has stated they have documented 17 instances of contact between Trump agents and the Russians. There has been nothing reported on Hillary
Guess what? Hillary is not President
You guys have been investigating Hillary for 25 years
You found NOTHING....not even an indictment
Now you whimper like little Snowflakes if Trump gets investigated for nine months
<sob> Why isn't it over yet?
Wah...wah...wah....This is a witch hunt
You are kind of jumping the gun
Investigation is still ongoing. Why would you prosecute before you have collected all your evidence? Also, why would you release your evidence before all the principals have been interviewed
We have not even interviewed Flynn, Manafort, Sessions or Trump.....why would you expect the investigation to end?
Of course, should that happen, we'll get President Pence. I wonder how many of the anti-Trumpers believe Hillary will become president if Trump leaves?
I didn't. He was asked if he saw any evidence, and instead of saying no, he said "I don't do evidence". That obviously means he did not see any. He's not man enough to admit he saw none (or he doesn't want to incur his party's wrath) so being the good little soldier he is, he danced around it by making that pathetic statement. Bottom line, he saw no evidence or he would have said otherwise.I like how you declined to address my other points..First, no one has shown any evidence Russia hacked the emails. You need to do that before you can make a case for collusion and after 7 months, you haven't shown any evidence of either.Russia released damaging emails against Hillary and Trump used those emails on a weekly basis to slam Hillary......Yes, that constitutes help
Second, you're crying "foul" because she was exposed. Instead of bitching about her being caught, you should be pissed off at Hillary for her corruption. You think like a criminal.
Get a better candidate next time instead of bitching about yours being exposed for her corruption. You're trying to make Trump responsible for her crimes. You don't have shit.
Just stop it
Your denials are becoming just plain silly. Yes there is evidence that Russia hacked the servers. It has been reported by the FBI, CIA and other intelligence agencies. The evidence has been provided to Congress. The evidence was briefed to both President Obama and President Trump who both accepted the conclusion that Russia hacked the DNC server
Your conclusion that just because classified information hasn't been released to some dimwitted message board poster, it must not exist is just plain stupid
You mean the point where you lied about what Brennan said in the OP?
I didn't. He was asked if he saw any evidence, and instead of saying no, he said "I don't do evidence". That obviously means he did not see any. He's not man enough to admit he saw none (or he doesn't want to incur his party's wrath) so being the good little soldier he is, he danced around it by making that pathetic statement. Bottom line, he saw no evidence or he would have said otherwise.I like how you declined to address my other points..First, no one has shown any evidence Russia hacked the emails. You need to do that before you can make a case for collusion and after 7 months, you haven't shown any evidence of either.Russia released damaging emails against Hillary and Trump used those emails on a weekly basis to slam Hillary......Yes, that constitutes help
Second, you're crying "foul" because she was exposed. Instead of bitching about her being caught, you should be pissed off at Hillary for her corruption. You think like a criminal.
Get a better candidate next time instead of bitching about yours being exposed for her corruption. You're trying to make Trump responsible for her crimes. You don't have shit.
Just stop it
Your denials are becoming just plain silly. Yes there is evidence that Russia hacked the servers. It has been reported by the FBI, CIA and other intelligence agencies. The evidence has been provided to Congress. The evidence was briefed to both President Obama and President Trump who both accepted the conclusion that Russia hacked the DNC server
Your conclusion that just because classified information hasn't been released to some dimwitted message board poster, it must not exist is just plain stupid
You mean the point where you lied about what Brennan said in the OP?
I didn't. He was asked if he saw any evidence, and instead of saying no, he said "I don't do evidence". That obviously means he did not see any. He's not man enough to admit he saw none (or he doesn't want to incur his party's wrath) so being the good little soldier he is, he danced around it by making that pathetic statement. Bottom line, he saw no evidence or he would have said otherwise.I like how you declined to address my other points..First, no one has shown any evidence Russia hacked the emails. You need to do that before you can make a case for collusion and after 7 months, you haven't shown any evidence of either.Russia released damaging emails against Hillary and Trump used those emails on a weekly basis to slam Hillary......Yes, that constitutes help
Second, you're crying "foul" because she was exposed. Instead of bitching about her being caught, you should be pissed off at Hillary for her corruption. You think like a criminal.
Get a better candidate next time instead of bitching about yours being exposed for her corruption. You're trying to make Trump responsible for her crimes. You don't have shit.
Just stop it
Your denials are becoming just plain silly. Yes there is evidence that Russia hacked the servers. It has been reported by the FBI, CIA and other intelligence agencies. The evidence has been provided to Congress. The evidence was briefed to both President Obama and President Trump who both accepted the conclusion that Russia hacked the DNC server
Your conclusion that just because classified information hasn't been released to some dimwitted message board poster, it must not exist is just plain stupid
You mean the point where you lied about what Brennan said in the OP?
Translation: Somebody exposed the corruption of the DNC and reaffirmed Hillary is a criminal so she lost and we need to somehow make it Trump's fault so I'll just say "I don't do evidence". That way I can accuse him without having to lie about not seeing any evidence.,..“It was clear to everyone Russia brazenly interfered and under explicit warning to not do so,” Brennan said.
Translation: Somebody exposed the corruption of the DNC and reaffirmed Hillary is a criminal so she lost and we need to somehow make it Trump's fault so I'll just say "I don't do evidence". That way I can accuse him without having to lie about not seeing any evidence.,..“It was clear to everyone Russia brazenly interfered and under explicit warning to not do so,” Brennan said.
See post #150.Translation: Somebody exposed the corruption of the DNC and reaffirmed Hillary is a criminal so she lost and we need to somehow make it Trump's fault so I'll just say "I don't do evidence". That way I can accuse him without having to lie about not seeing any evidence.,..“It was clear to everyone Russia brazenly interfered and under explicit warning to not do so,” Brennan said.
“I really don’t do evidence. I do intelligence,” he said. “As an intelligence professional, what we try to do is to make sure that we provide all relevant information to the bureau if there is an investigation underway that they’re looking into criminal activity.”
See post #150.Translation: Somebody exposed the corruption of the DNC and reaffirmed Hillary is a criminal so she lost and we need to somehow make it Trump's fault so I'll just say "I don't do evidence". That way I can accuse him without having to lie about not seeing any evidence.,..“It was clear to everyone Russia brazenly interfered and under explicit warning to not do so,” Brennan said.
“I really don’t do evidence. I do intelligence,” he said. “As an intelligence professional, what we try to do is to make sure that we provide all relevant information to the bureau if there is an investigation underway that they’re looking into criminal activity.”
I didn't. He was asked if he saw any evidence, and instead of saying no, he said "I don't do evidence". That obviously means he did not see any. He's not man enough to admit he saw none (or he doesn't want to incur his party's wrath) so being the good little soldier he is, he danced around it by making that pathetic statement. Bottom line, he saw no evidence or he would have said otherwise.I like how you declined to address my other points..First, no one has shown any evidence Russia hacked the emails. You need to do that before you can make a case for collusion and after 7 months, you haven't shown any evidence of either.Russia released damaging emails against Hillary and Trump used those emails on a weekly basis to slam Hillary......Yes, that constitutes help
Second, you're crying "foul" because she was exposed. Instead of bitching about her being caught, you should be pissed off at Hillary for her corruption. You think like a criminal.
Get a better candidate next time instead of bitching about yours being exposed for her corruption. You're trying to make Trump responsible for her crimes. You don't have shit.
Just stop it
Your denials are becoming just plain silly. Yes there is evidence that Russia hacked the servers. It has been reported by the FBI, CIA and other intelligence agencies. The evidence has been provided to Congress. The evidence was briefed to both President Obama and President Trump who both accepted the conclusion that Russia hacked the DNC server
Your conclusion that just because classified information hasn't been released to some dimwitted message board poster, it must not exist is just plain stupid
You mean the point where you lied about what Brennan said in the OP?
How dare you use facts to show how S.J. is lying again! Not fair!See post #150.Translation: Somebody exposed the corruption of the DNC and reaffirmed Hillary is a criminal so she lost and we need to somehow make it Trump's fault so I'll just say "I don't do evidence". That way I can accuse him without having to lie about not seeing any evidence.,..“It was clear to everyone Russia brazenly interfered and under explicit warning to not do so,” Brennan said.
“I really don’t do evidence. I do intelligence,” he said. “As an intelligence professional, what we try to do is to make sure that we provide all relevant information to the bureau if there is an investigation underway that they’re looking into criminal activity.”
Dodge noted cupcake
“I really don’t do evidence. I do intelligence,” he said.
“As an intelligence professional, what we try to do is to make sure that we provide all relevant information to the bureau if there is an investigation underway that they’re looking into criminal activity.”
No dodge necessary, snowflake. Post something different if you want a different response, idiot.See post #150.Translation: Somebody exposed the corruption of the DNC and reaffirmed Hillary is a criminal so she lost and we need to somehow make it Trump's fault so I'll just say "I don't do evidence". That way I can accuse him without having to lie about not seeing any evidence.,..“It was clear to everyone Russia brazenly interfered and under explicit warning to not do so,” Brennan said.
“I really don’t do evidence. I do intelligence,” he said. “As an intelligence professional, what we try to do is to make sure that we provide all relevant information to the bureau if there is an investigation underway that they’re looking into criminal activity.”
Dodge noted cupcake
“I really don’t do evidence. I do intelligence,” he said.
“As an intelligence professional, what we try to do is to make sure that we provide all relevant information to the bureau if there is an investigation underway that they’re looking into criminal activity.”
What, you think if you repeat it enough it'll make it so? Brennan was asked a direct question (and everyone recognizes evidence when they see it) and he ducked it. When he said "I don't do evidence", he admitted he didn't see any. Deny it all you want, it's what you do.I didn't. He was asked if he saw any evidence, and instead of saying no, he said "I don't do evidence". That obviously means he did not see any. He's not man enough to admit he saw none (or he doesn't want to incur his party's wrath) so being the good little soldier he is, he danced around it by making that pathetic statement. Bottom line, he saw no evidence or he would have said otherwise.I like how you declined to address my other points..First, no one has shown any evidence Russia hacked the emails. You need to do that before you can make a case for collusion and after 7 months, you haven't shown any evidence of either.
Second, you're crying "foul" because she was exposed. Instead of bitching about her being caught, you should be pissed off at Hillary for her corruption. You think like a criminal.
Get a better candidate next time instead of bitching about yours being exposed for her corruption. You're trying to make Trump responsible for her crimes. You don't have shit.
Just stop it
Your denials are becoming just plain silly. Yes there is evidence that Russia hacked the servers. It has been reported by the FBI, CIA and other intelligence agencies. The evidence has been provided to Congress. The evidence was briefed to both President Obama and President Trump who both accepted the conclusion that Russia hacked the DNC server
Your conclusion that just because classified information hasn't been released to some dimwitted message board poster, it must not exist is just plain stupid
You mean the point where you lied about what Brennan said in the OP?
Yes- you lied- flat out lied.
You said that Brennan 'admitted' that he had seen no evidence'- Brennan never said any such thing. You just lied.
Bottom line- you are a pathetic partisan liar.
No dodge necessary, snowflake. Post something different if you want a different response, idiot.See post #150.Translation: Somebody exposed the corruption of the DNC and reaffirmed Hillary is a criminal so she lost and we need to somehow make it Trump's fault so I'll just say "I don't do evidence". That way I can accuse him without having to lie about not seeing any evidence.,..“It was clear to everyone Russia brazenly interfered and under explicit warning to not do so,” Brennan said.
“I really don’t do evidence. I do intelligence,” he said. “As an intelligence professional, what we try to do is to make sure that we provide all relevant information to the bureau if there is an investigation underway that they’re looking into criminal activity.”
Dodge noted cupcake
“I really don’t do evidence. I do intelligence,” he said.
“As an intelligence professional, what we try to do is to make sure that we provide all relevant information to the bureau if there is an investigation underway that they’re looking into criminal activity.”
What, you think if you repeat it enough it'll make it so? Brennan was asked a direct question (and everyone recognizes evidence when they see it) and he ducked it. When he said "I don't do evidence", he admitted he didn't see any. Deny it all you want, it's what you do.I didn't. He was asked if he saw any evidence, and instead of saying no, he said "I don't do evidence". That obviously means he did not see any. He's not man enough to admit he saw none (or he doesn't want to incur his party's wrath) so being the good little soldier he is, he danced around it by making that pathetic statement. Bottom line, he saw no evidence or he would have said otherwise.I like how you declined to address my other points..Just stop it
Your denials are becoming just plain silly. Yes there is evidence that Russia hacked the servers. It has been reported by the FBI, CIA and other intelligence agencies. The evidence has been provided to Congress. The evidence was briefed to both President Obama and President Trump who both accepted the conclusion that Russia hacked the DNC server
Your conclusion that just because classified information hasn't been released to some dimwitted message board poster, it must not exist is just plain stupid
You mean the point where you lied about what Brennan said in the OP?
Yes- you lied- flat out lied.
You said that Brennan 'admitted' that he had seen no evidence'- Brennan never said any such thing. You just lied.
Bottom line- you are a pathetic partisan liar.
You're quite the drama queen, aren't you?What, you think if you repeat it enough it'll make it so? Brennan was asked a direct question (and everyone recognizes evidence when they see it) and he ducked it. When he said "I don't do evidence", he admitted he didn't see any. Deny it all you want, it's what you do.I didn't. He was asked if he saw any evidence, and instead of saying no, he said "I don't do evidence". That obviously means he did not see any. He's not man enough to admit he saw none (or he doesn't want to incur his party's wrath) so being the good little soldier he is, he danced around it by making that pathetic statement. Bottom line, he saw no evidence or he would have said otherwise.I like how you declined to address my other points..
You mean the point where you lied about what Brennan said in the OP?
Yes- you lied- flat out lied.
You said that Brennan 'admitted' that he had seen no evidence'- Brennan never said any such thing. You just lied.
Bottom line- you are a pathetic partisan liar.
LOL- if he had admitted he didn't see any you would have a quote of Brennan saying that.
You don't.
You lied.
Because that is what you do.
Bottom line- you are a pathetic partisan.