ObamaCare enrollees - by state

[Luddly Neddite]

Because of the post that incorrectly states that no one in Oregon has signed up for Obamacare -
http://www.usmessageboard.com/healt...46343-obamacare-in-oregon-zero-enrollees.html

I thought it would be interesting to see the truth -

State Marketplace Statistics | The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation

Because of their web site problems, its low but its certainly not "zero". But, check out this site too -

ACA Private QHP (Qualified Health Plan) Spreadsheet | ACASignups.net
(Note the links.)

 

[Sherry]

The truth is that the majority of Independents have turned against Obamacare...honest libs have seen the writing on the wall that November will be ugly for their party.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

The truth is that the majority of Independents have turned against Obamacare...honest libs have seen the writing on the wall that November will be ugly for their party.

Thanks for that input but it has nothing at to do with the OP.

 

[Sherry]

The truth is that the majority of Independents have turned against Obamacare...honest libs have seen the writing on the wall that November will be ugly for their party.

Thanks for that input but it has nothing at to do with the OP.

Pardon me, I thought you'd be interested in seeing the truth...do you really believe that whether one or one million enrolled in the state, that it won't be an albatross around the necks of liberal candidates across the country??

 

[MeBelle]

The truth is that the majority of Independents have turned against Obamacare...honest libs have seen the writing on the wall that November will be ugly for their party.

Thanks for that input but it has nothing at to do with the OP.

What input from the OP??
No numbers for MARCH have been released and it's the end of April.

A blogger's guestimate, no matter where they come from, are not bound in truth.

 

[Stephanie]

1.5 TRILLION DOLLARS

how pitiful out of 360 MILLION people in the country

 

[Stephanie]

links in article at site

SNIP:
Poll: Nearly 60% Don't Believe Obamacare Enrollment Numbers

by Wynton Hall 29 Apr 2014 202 post a comment


The Kaiser Health Tracking Poll released on Tuesday paints a dismal portrait of the nation's attitudes about Obamacare, including nearly six in ten who said the government fell short of enrollment levels.

Despite the Obama administration's claim that it enrolled eight million Americans in Obamacare--a figure one million higher than its original seven million target--just 14% of Americans said the government "exceeded expectations."

A full 57% said Obamacare "is not working as planned" versus 38% who agreed with the statement, "There were some early problems that have been fixed and now the law is basically working as intended."

The poll also asked uninsured Americans why they they currently lack health insurance. Of those surveyed, over one in three (36%) uninsured Americans said they "tried to get coverage but it was too expensive." Indeed, almost half of the uninsured (45%) said they expect to be forced to pay a fine for remaining uninsured.

The Kaiser Health Tracking Poll found that just 38% of Americans now support Obamacare.

The Washington Post/ABC News poll released on Tuesday records President Barack Obama hitting his lowest-ever approval rating of just 41%.

ALL of it here
Poll: Nearly 60% Don't Believe Obamacare Enrollment Numbers

 

[MeBelle]

Wow!!!

Kaiser Family Foundation is supposed to be non-profit and non-partisan!

I knew they were FOS.

 

[emilynghiem]

The truth is that the majority of Independents have turned against Obamacare...honest libs have seen the writing on the wall that November will be ugly for their party.

Thanks for that input but it has nothing at to do with the OP.

No offense, dear.

But I think the point is
your OP
has nothing to do with the REAL OPPOSITION to the issue.

The SPIRIT of the law is OFF.

You keep citing "letter of the law" level stats for your arguments.
But NONE of that addresses the reason for opposition
being taxation without representing the consent of the people.

Luddly all the people who CHOOSE to participate and SUPPORT
the ACA and stats on it can still be free to do so without
forcing others by law against their will.

Why is this never addressed but ignored?

You already have freedom to buy insurance and participate in
creating exchanges and negotiating group rates.

You don't need to impose punitive mandates to force that on people.

That is the reason for the opposition in the first place.

Your OP is just another argument focusing on the
"PROVING DETAILS" about the skin, tail or feet of the elephant,
and not admitting there is a huge elephant in the room that
people don't want there.

Do you REALLY believe that if you can "prove details" about
this Elephant, then people will magically change their minds
about wanting it in the room?

Why even post OP like this
until you acknowledge that is the problem in the first place?

Does it really do any good, Luddly,
Are you just preaching to people who already want to deal with this Elephant?

 

[Zander]

Obamacare is Winning!!!!

That's why so many Democrats are running away from it......

 

[Mr. H.]

Half of Illinois ObamaCare enrollees haven't paid their premium

 

[DriftingSand]

After Obama broke his often repeated and emphatic PROMISE that everyone could "keep" their current policy approximately 250,000 Coloradans lost their insurance. Then Obama put a gun to their head and said you MUST buy insurance or be penalized come tax time.

Hardly something to celebrate!!!!

 

[Luddly Neddite]

The truth is that the majority of Independents have turned against Obamacare...honest libs have seen the writing on the wall that November will be ugly for their party.

Thanks for that input but it has nothing at to do with the OP.

No offense, Luddly my honey bun.

But I think the point is
your OP
has nothing to do with the REAL OPPOSITION to the issue.

The SPIRIT of the law is OFF.

You keep citing "letter of the law" level stats for your arguments.
But NONE of that addresses the reason for opposition
being taxation without representing the consent of the people.

Luddly all the people who CHOOSE to participate and SUPPORT
the ACA and stats on it can still be free to do so without
forcing others by law against their will.

Why is this never addressed but ignored?

You already have freedom to buy insurance and participate in
creating exchanges and negotiating group rates.

You don't need to impose punitive mandates to force that on people.

That is the reason for the opposition in the first place.

Your OP is just another argument focusing on the
"PROVING DETAILS" about the skin, tail or feet of the elephant,
and not admitting there is a huge elephant in the room that
people don't want there.

Do you REALLY believe that if you can "prove details" about
this Elephant, then people will magically change their minds
about wanting it in the room?

Why even post OP like this
until you acknowledge that is the problem in the first place?

Does it really do any good, Luddly my love,
Are you just preaching to people who already want to deal with this Elephant?

The point of the OP is "ObamaCare enrollees - by state".

If you want a thread about "the spirit of the law", post a thread called "the spirit of the law".

Get it?

No, I didn't think you would.

 

[emilynghiem]

The point of the OP is "ObamaCare enrollees - by state".

If you want a thread about "the spirit of the law", post a thread called "the spirit of the law".

Get it?

No, I didn't think you would.

You are addressing people who respond by the spirit of the law,
the Constitution by which ACA is in direct conflict.

Just letting you know that all you say
is being rejected in that light.

Just explaining so you won't think it is something to do with the
facts you are citing.

Sorry Luddly, nothing negative intended.
Just trying to break down these barriers
and understand what we are up against
if we are going to communicate between literalists on the left
and spiritualists on the right, and find where these agree!

 

[Luddly Neddite]

The point of the OP is "ObamaCare enrollees - by state".

If you want a thread about "the spirit of the law", post a thread called "the spirit of the law".

Get it?

No, I didn't think you would.

You are addressing people who respond by the spirit of the law,
the Constitution by which ACA is in direct conflict.

Just letting you know that all you say
is being rejected in that light.

Just explaining so you won't think it is something to do with the
facts you are citing.

Sorry Luddly, nothing negative intended.
Just trying to break down these barriers
and understand what we are up against
if we are going to communicate between literalists on the left
and spiritualists on the right, and find where these agree!

No. I posted statistics. That's it. That's all. Period. Nothing else but numbers.

If you want to discuss "spirit" and/or the Constitution, start a thread about "spirit" and/or the Constitution.

All you're doing is trying to avoid looking at those numbers.

=== === ===

Take a look at your posts above.

Just because you delete offensive and creepy crap from your post, its still in the post that quoted yours.

You don't get to lie quite that easily.

 

[MeBelle]

No. I posted statistics. That's it. That's all. Period. Nothing else but numbers.

Nope, you posted a blog, that's all.