Bolded part, correct. The rest? While yes from infant forward they are outside vs. inside the womb, being that they are ALL stages in the life of a human being, ALL stages have the same rights. Seeing as they're you know, HUMAN and all.
Well, they don't according to our Laws on the books as they stand,
and they don't according to Biblical Law either imo....I have already posted the passage in the Bible that indicates such.
I can do so again, if you missed it.
See, for me....there is absolutely no question in my mind, at this point in my own life, that Conception begins the life of ones own offspring....no one knows this more than me, because my husband and I have not been able to conceive....I would give anything to be pregnant....because that would mean, that my hubby and I could have a child....simple as that....I KNOW the life of ones offspring, begins at conception....trust me on that....
care
The laws on our books are wrong.
The Bible can be interpreted in many ways.
The one, defining, common thing that a zygote vs. a 90 year old man have in common is the fact that they are both
human. Different stages? Yes. So what pro-abortionists are saying is that killing the unborn is fine, depending upon what stage of 'humaness' it's in.
Nope. Destroying the unborn - no matter what stage they are in - is destroying a human.
There is still MORE than one life involved, which many tend to neglect and ignore.
And each case, is its own individual case, with its own circumstance, of which God is well aware....it's between them and their maker when all is said and done.
I still believe there is more value to a human born than a human not born....
if a fertility clinic is on fire....and both living employees are at risk of dying if not saved by the firemen and frozen embryos are at risk of dying if not saved by the firemen, I choose saving the breathing, living employees FIRST, over and above any of the frozen embryos.
And the firemen would choose the same, and any sane person would choose the same, and i think you would do the same....this is not illogical, it is logical....imo.
So this gives more worth to a living breathing human than a living human embryo....both human, both alive, but one is born, and one is not born....
I didn't see if you made comment on the post where i showed common law early on in this country, where abortions up to quickening were permitted and after quickening they were against the law....
this is not something new, that this generation of people out of the blue, decided to believe...it is something that has nearly always been believed....
Even with the life of the mother chosen over the life of the baby to be, even if the baby to be can be saved....if the child being born will near certainly kill the mother, the Doctor is obligated to save the mother's life, over the foetus.... unless the parents of the child to be tell the doctor otherwise.
all of this gives greater worth to a breathing human over a developing human....while both being living entities, one is BORN and one is not....
Where this really fits in to the question on whether abortion should be legal or not...is another story.
