Obama Threatens To Veto Planned Parenthood Defunding Bill

[JakeStarkey]

I do not "Hate God."

I do not believe in, accept, or support the belief in a Monotheistic Male god-head magic sky man.

Nor do I want, need, desire, request and/or require to hear about such a non-existent Monotheistic Male god head magic sky man. I know right from wrong and do not need to be told how to my life by a bunch of gullible, self absorbed, deluded, self righteous loud mouth dead from the neck up individuals who use their version of their god as a weapon against people.

Keep your hateful god to yourself. I do not need it. I do not want it.

But we have every right to talk about our theism in public as you do against it. You have no constitutional right to not hear it or to not be offended by it.

 

[thanatos144]

I do not "Hate God."

I do not believe in, accept, or support the belief in a Monotheistic Male god-head magic sky man.

Nor do I want, need, desire, request and/or require to hear about such a non-existent Monotheistic Male god head magic sky man. I know right from wrong and do not need to be told how to my life by a bunch of gullible, self absorbed, deluded, self righteous loud mouth dead from the neck up individuals who use their version of their god as a weapon against people.

Keep your hateful god to yourself. I do not need it. I do not want it.

You are the ones wanting to slaughter more and more human babies and you dare call God hateful? You progressives evils are unmatched

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

 

[bravoactual]

I do not "Hate God."

I do not believe in, accept, or support the belief in a Monotheistic Male god-head magic sky man.

Nor do I want, need, desire, request and/or require to hear about such a non-existent Monotheistic Male god head magic sky man. I know right from wrong and do not need to be told how to my life by a bunch of gullible, self absorbed, deluded, self righteous loud mouth dead from the neck up individuals who use their version of their god as a weapon against people.

Keep your hateful god to yourself. I do not need it. I do not want it.

But we have every right to talk about our theism in public as you do against it. You have no constitutional right to not hear it or to not be offended by it.

I did not say that, YOU did.

YOU have YOUR Right to talk about your non-existent male god head sky man all you want.

YOU DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO USE YOUR RELIGION AS A WEAPON AGAINST ANY PERSON, AN WHERE, AT ANY TIME.

YOU DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT, BASED UPON YOUR BELIEF IN A NON-EXISTENT MALE GOD HEAD SKY MAN TO DECIDE THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS, REGARDLESS OF THEIR FAITH OR THE LACK THERE UNTO PERTAINING . YOUR FAITH DOES NOT GIVE YOU THE RIGHT TO DECIDE WHAT IS AND/OR IS NOT IMMORAL BASED UPON YOUR FAITH. YOU DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO DECIDED WHO CAN AND CANNOT MARRY BASED UPON YOUR BELIEF IN A NON-EXISTENT MALE GOD HEAD SKY MAN.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I do not "Hate God."

I do not believe in, accept, or support the belief in a Monotheistic Male god-head magic sky man.

Nor do I want, need, desire, request and/or require to hear about such a non-existent Monotheistic Male god head magic sky man. I know right from wrong and do not need to be told how to my life by a bunch of gullible, self absorbed, deluded, self righteous loud mouth dead from the neck up individuals who use their version of their god as a weapon against people.

Keep your hateful god to yourself. I do not need it. I do not want it.

But we have every right to talk about our theism in public as you do against it. You have no constitutional right to not hear it or to not be offended by it.

I did not say that, YOU did.

YOU have YOUR Right to talk about your non-existent male god head sky man all you want.

YOU DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO USE YOUR RELIGION AS A WEAPON AGAINST ANY PERSON, AN WHERE, AT ANY TIME.

YOU DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT, BASED UPON YOUR BELIEF IN A NON-EXISTENT MALE GOD HEAD SKY MAN TO DECIDE THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS, REGARDLESS OF THEIR FAITH OR THE LACK THERE UNTO PERTAINING . YOUR FAITH DOES NOT GIVE YOU THE RIGHT TO DECIDE WHAT IS AND/OR IS NOT IMMORAL BASED UPON YOUR FAITH. YOU DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO DECIDED WHO CAN AND CANNOT MARRY BASED UPON YOUR BELIEF IN A NON-EXISTENT MALE GOD HEAD SKY MAN.

You said that, I did not.

I have every right to act in the public forum according to my religious values, to vote as my values dictate, to enact policy and procedure in accordance with my values within the construct of the law.

You have the very right to do so also in accordance with your secular values in the construct of the laws.

If anti-Godists, like you, try to force us out of the public forum in violation of our Constitution rights, we will crush you, bravoactual.

We will consider you the Godless counterparts of the Nazis.

The USA is generally a nation of Christians and other theists, and that is not changing.

 

[auditor0007]

Of course he will veto it..... all progressives want dead babies it is what evil ***** do

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

Well, you don't want to help the mothers out once the babies out of the womb...So it takes two.

What a ******* lie. What help do you progressives do? Enslavement and disillusionment? What good has your ideology done for the poor? it has been 50 years since the great society and poverty hasn't gotten better but those rich democrats stayed rich didn't they?

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

You idiots believe the poor would be better off with no social support whatsoever. Have you ever seen the slums of Brazil or India, or an of these other third world countries. That is what you want. Unbelievable.

 

[g5000]

So lets get this straight...

A woman of 18 is expecting a baby by a man who has just done a runner. He had no job and no means of support as well. She has no means of income apart from the government.
Who is paying for this kid to be brought up? Who is advocating the massive expanse in welfare?

So let's get this straight...

A woman of 18 just had a baby by a man who has just done a runner.

Why can't she just kill her baby?

 

[g5000]

So lets get this straight...

A woman of 18 is expecting a baby by a man who has just done a runner. He had no job and no means of support as well. She has no means of income apart from the government.
Who is paying for this kid to be brought up? Who is advocating the massive expanse in welfare?

So let's get this straight...

A woman of 19 has a one year old baby. The father just died yesterday and he had no life insurance.

Why can't she just kill her baby?

 

[g5000]

I do not "Hate God."

But you obviously hate those who love God.

I do not believe in, accept, or support the belief in a Monotheistic Male god-head magic sky man.

Nor do I want, need, desire, request and/or require to hear about such a non-existent Monotheistic Male god head magic sky man. I know right from wrong and do not need to be told how to my life by a bunch of gullible, self absorbed, deluded, self righteous loud mouth dead from the neck up individuals who use their version of their god as a weapon against people.

Keep your hateful god to yourself. I do not need it. I do not want it.

Seeeee?

 

[JakeStarkey]

So lets get this straight...

A woman of 18 is expecting a baby by a man who has just done a runner. He had no job and no means of support as well. She has no means of income apart from the government.
Who is paying for this kid to be brought up? Who is advocating the massive expanse in welfare?

So let's get this straight...

A woman of 18 just had a baby by a man who has just done a runner.

Why can't she just kill her baby?

A fallacy of false equivalency. Why don't you properly support single mothers and their children so they support themselves. Buttholes.

 

[JakeStarkey]

So lets get this straight...

A woman of 18 is expecting a baby by a man who has just done a runner. He had no job and no means of support as well. She has no means of income apart from the government.
Who is paying for this kid to be brought up? Who is advocating the massive expanse in welfare?

So let's get this straight...

A woman of 19 has a one year old baby. The father just died yesterday and he had no life insurance.

Why can't she just kill her baby?

Explained above. A fallacy of false equivalency. Why don't you properly support single mothers and their children so they support themselves. Buttholes..

 

[g5000]

So lets get this straight...

A woman of 18 is expecting a baby by a man who has just done a runner. He had no job and no means of support as well. She has no means of income apart from the government.
Who is paying for this kid to be brought up? Who is advocating the massive expanse in welfare?

So let's get this straight...

A woman of 18 just had a baby by a man who has just done a runner.

Why can't she just kill her baby?

A fallacy of false equivalency.

There is no excuse given for an abortion which could not apply to a birthed baby. Financial/emotional strain, etc., etc., etc.

Why don't you properly support single mothers and their children so they support themselves. Buttholes.

What makes you think I don't? I have started two non-profits that have served more children than I bet everyone on this forum has ever supported combined.

 

[Timmy]

A zygote or fetus is not the same as a full grown baby .

A baby can live outside the mom on its own, a fetus cant.

Conservatives are pro death penalty anyway . So get off your moral high horse .

 

[g5000]

A zygote or fetus is not the same as a full grown baby .

A baby can live outside the mom on its own, a fetus cant.

So if that baby outside the mom is in an oxygen tent or incubator, we can kill it?

Conservatives are pro death penalty anyway .

Generalization fallacy. Untrue statement.

 

[JakeStarkey]

So lets get this straight...

A woman of 18 is expecting a baby by a man who has just done a runner. He had no job and no means of support as well. She has no means of income apart from the government.
Who is paying for this kid to be brought up? Who is advocating the massive expanse in welfare?

So let's get this straight...

A woman of 18 just had a baby by a man who has just done a runner.

Why can't she just kill her baby?

A fallacy of false equivalency.

There is no excuse given for an abortion which could not apply to a birthed baby. Financial/emotional strain, etc., etc., etc.

Why don't you properly support single mothers and their children so they support themselves. Buttholes.

What makes you think I don't? I have started two non-profits that have served more children than I bet everyone on this forum has ever supported combined.

Then step it up, slacker. And get the butt holes (you obviously are not one) to begin stepping it up. Buttholes.

 

[Timmy]

A zygote or fetus is not the same as a full grown baby .

A baby can live outside the mom on its own, a fetus cant.

So if that baby outside the mom is in an oxygen tent or incubator, we can kill it?

Conservatives are pro death penalty anyway .

Generalization fallacy. Untrue statement.

If it's a viable baby I'm with Ya. But take first term for example . It's basically part of the women , it can't survive on its own. It's potentially a human.

 

[thanatos144]

Of course he will veto it..... all progressives want dead babies it is what evil ***** do

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

Well, you don't want to help the mothers out once the babies out of the womb...So it takes two.

What a ******* lie. What help do you progressives do? Enslavement and disillusionment? What good has your ideology done for the poor? it has been 50 years since the great society and poverty hasn't gotten better but those rich democrats stayed rich didn't they?

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

You idiots believe the poor would be better off with no social support whatsoever. Have you ever seen the slums of Brazil or India, or an of these other third world countries. That is what you want. Unbelievable.

Dummy the have socialist governments

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

 

[thanatos144]

A zygote or fetus is not the same as a full grown baby .

A baby can live outside the mom on its own, a fetus cant.

Conservatives are pro death penalty anyway . So get off your moral high horse .

A baby will die without being fed and clothed so no your lie doesn't wash

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

 

[TimothysAlaska]

Obama Threatens To Veto Planned Parenthood Defunding Bill

Not good news for all the opponents to abortion who want deprive women their rights, better life and health. The Planned Parenthood won`t be defunded. Obama will veto Republican anti-abortion bill. Voila! Yet some of his presidential projects could be appreciated.

Good!

I do not understand what all the hubbub is about. The abortion happened, the women decided to terminate it, it is already dead. Would they be happier if the hospital just put it in the incinerator? It is not planned parenthood that is having abortions. It is pregnant women. And they use the unwanted material for science. They act like planned parenthood is impregnating women and forcing them to have abortions so they could make money off of the material.

I don't care if women get abortions. if they do not like abortions don't get them. Lol trying to control things that are out of your control is crazy. Just make a law saying no Christians are allowed to have abortions. Problem solved.

I am speechless. I have seen many posts from people who are utterly ignorant of a topic and proud of that ignorance - but in no way hindered from gasbagging about it, nonetheless - but you absolutely stand out from the crowd for both sheer imbecility and utterly erroneous self-satisfaction therein. If I thought for a second that you possessed an ounce of shame, I would suggest that you never, ever, EVER comment in public on anything more significant than the weather for the rest of your existence, because God knows, you are stunningly unqualified to do so.

But if you had a sense of shame, you wouldn't be such a mindwiped fuckstain in the first place, so . . .

Huh? You care about babies that were aborted? How many times have you helped babies that were not aborted? Don't give me your self righteous indignation of how aweful I am, when you don't do a damn thing to help anybody but yourself.

It is law, women can have abortions! Gays can get married to. So what? Your life hasn't changed. It does not affect you whatsoever. Get over yourself.

And what did I say that was untrue? go vote for trump or that other idiot huckabee. The quality and critical thinking skills of all politicians left and right, is atrocious. I would rather not have any president if this is all they offer.

 

[kaz]

So lets get this straight...

A woman of 18 is expecting a baby by a man who has just done a runner. He had no job and no means of support as well. She has no means of income apart from the government.
Who is paying for this kid to be brought up? Who is advocating the massive expanse in welfare?

So let's get this straight...

A woman of 18 just had a baby by a man who has just done a runner.

Why can't she just kill her baby?

A fallacy of false equivalency.

There is no excuse given for an abortion which could not apply to a birthed baby

Of course there is. Abortion is exercising a woman's right to her own body. that doesn't apply to a "birthed baby"

 

[thanatos144]

Obama Threatens To Veto Planned Parenthood Defunding Bill

Not good news for all the opponents to abortion who want deprive women their rights, better life and health. The Planned Parenthood won`t be defunded. Obama will veto Republican anti-abortion bill. Voila! Yet some of his presidential projects could be appreciated.

Good!

I do not understand what all the hubbub is about. The abortion happened, the women decided to terminate it, it is already dead. Would they be happier if the hospital just put it in the incinerator? It is not planned parenthood that is having abortions. It is pregnant women. And they use the unwanted material for science. They act like planned parenthood is impregnating women and forcing them to have abortions so they could make money off of the material.

I don't care if women get abortions. if they do not like abortions don't get them. Lol trying to control things that are out of your control is crazy. Just make a law saying no Christians are allowed to have abortions. Problem solved.

I am speechless. I have seen many posts from people who are utterly ignorant of a topic and proud of that ignorance - but in no way hindered from gasbagging about it, nonetheless - but you absolutely stand out from the crowd for both sheer imbecility and utterly erroneous self-satisfaction therein. If I thought for a second that you possessed an ounce of shame, I would suggest that you never, ever, EVER comment in public on anything more significant than the weather for the rest of your existence, because God knows, you are stunningly unqualified to do so.

But if you had a sense of shame, you wouldn't be such a mindwiped fuckstain in the first place, so . . .

Huh? You care about babies that were aborted? How many times have you helped babies that were not aborted? Don't give me your self righteous indignation of how aweful I am, when you don't do a damn thing to help anybody but yourself.

It is law, women can have abortions! Gays can get married to. So what? Your life hasn't changed. It does not affect you whatsoever. Get over yourself.

And what did I say that was untrue? go vote for trump or that other idiot huckabee. The quality and critical thinking skills of all politicians left and right, is atrocious. I would rather not have any president if this is all they offer.

What have you done to help babies not aborted? Only to a monster does the thought of killing a baby mean helping that baby.

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk