I have tried to explain, but I've been posting on my phone, and it's harder to get my point across.
Here are a few of the issues I was talking about:
1. The program is entirely funded by private donations, not federal funds. The "task force" is, as the article explains, nothing but a way to centralize the local efforts. The members of the "task force" are already employed by the government, and won't be getting a raise.
2. Who the initiative is intended to help is irrelevant. Intentions don't hold legal status, and nothing about this program will create any laws that discriminate, or deny any rights to anyone. Therefore, it doesn't violate the 14th. Domestic violence programs are generally "intended" to help battered women. Do you think those violate the 14th?
1) The program uses government agencies to implement. Are you seriously not getting the message yet? These agencies ARE run by Federal funds. And yep, this task force is already employed by the government, which means they are being paid taxpayer money. There is no such thing as a free lunch. Whether they receive a raise or not is irrelevant.
2) Aha! You were making such a big deal about who it was supposed to be serving earlier.
You said the it was meant to help "everyone." That, sir, is a concession. The very language of this initiative is discriminatory. "Color" this, and "color" that; to say that it doesn't discriminate against a certain demographic group is egregiously false. Presidential Memorandums are similar to, if not identical to Executive Orders, which means they BOTH carry with them the force of law.