- Thread starter
- #281
Never gonna happen. I was just happy he didn't play games with it and defined it for what it was. Complaining that your Apple doesn't taste like an orange doesn't change the fact that you're eating apples.Were you unsure of what kind it was? Thinking maybe it was Irish terrorism? Perhaps Russian radicals?I WATCHED IT TOO, AND HE NEVER SAY'S WHAT "KIND" OF TERROR IT IS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THIS IS CLASSIC OBAMA WHO WILL NEVER CALL OUT ISLAM OR MUSLIMS !!
HE DOES HOWEVER BLAME THE INCIDENT ON THE AVAILABILITY OF GUNS !!
NEXT TIME BEFORE YOU MAKE YOUR OBAMA APOLOGIES, THINK FIRST !!!!!!
I knew exactly what kind of terrorism it was and I'm confident 99.9% of the rest of the world knows too.
Everyone may know, but Obama needs to come out and actually say it. The more a president actually publicly acknowledges who is behind the attacks, the more Americans can freely discuss it without being silenced by the left who will always be quick to refer to anyone blaming a specific group, as being a bigot.
Everyone knows the deal so it really doesn't matter how Obama categorizes it at this point. And I don't know about you but I don't give two shits what a loopy liberal calls me.
I completely DISAGREE with you.
I think it is extremely important for the leader of the free world to come out and actually use the words "Islam" and "Muslims" when discussing terrorism.
Yuh huh.
And did you come out and actually use the words "Christianity" and "Christians" when Eric Rudolph did the same thing? When Scott Roeder shot George Tiller? When Tim McVeigh blew up a building? Etc etc etc?
Yeah, I remember being all over internet message boards back in '93 discussing what McVeigh had just done.
Go you're an idiot.