Well that would tie into my theory that Americans are generally sick and tired of the hyper-partisan political theater that has ripped us apart over the past 20 years or so. I think that is why they nominated a guy who had a reputation for bucking the party and a relative newcomer who had a reputation for being able to bring diverse elements together.
But reading in some response to incremental bi-partisanship on one bill might be too optimistic for me.
IF it were just any bill, I may not put so much weight behind it. However, while Americans disagree on HOW healthcare should be reformed, the large majority agree that it does need to happen. The Democrats are finding a way to make it happen.
Yes they have. The most expensive way and the ONLY way that does not address the issue of rising premiums.
Contrary to what you want some of those that are not well informed to believe, the GOP HAS presented ideas that are proven solutions to the rising premium issue. Yet, for some reason NEITHER of them are addressed in the bill....so, of course, the GOP is deemed as obstructionists for not rolling over and playing dead.
So, if passed, the rising poremiums will still be an issue and the only change is that we all, as tax payers, will need to support the rising premiums not just for ourselves individually, but for everyone else as well.
The GOP ideas, coupled with the idea of "healthcare for all" would result in lower premiums to those that buy their own inusrance and only slightly higher taxes to support those that are presently uninsured.
Or....
We can do it the democrats way and increase taxes to cover the uninsured AND NOT stop the rising premiums to those that are paying for their own AND for the uninsured.
And poeple like you are OK with this....becuae you won!
Strange.