I have asked this question a few times in other threads and no one seems to want to answer it. I don't know if they are to busy with their heated debates to notice my question or not. So I figure I will start a thread and ask it directly
In obama's Bio "Dreams of my Father" he said he went through the last two years of high school in a haze, meaning he was a stoner. He also hinted that he would rather drink and do drugs then do school work. Now how can someone with this mentality and thinking be able to enter into Harvard law school. This is why I would like to see he college transcripts. With how he does when he is not being directed by a teleprompter and the way he's running a country that he has been intrusted with I cannot see how he managed to even make a acceptable entrance exam dumb fuck college.
What we do know.... without doubt.... is that his grade average at Columbia College was not more than 3.3, because his PolSci was 'without honors'.
This is the 'smartest' POTUS we've ever had? Don't make me laugh.
why do you care?
he made harvard law review.... that means he was TOP 10% of his class at Harvard Law. I'd say that's pretty good. And the O/P knows it because it's been repeatedly explained to him. That means he must be trolling.
Are we really kidding here?
and who says he's our smartest president? bill clinton was our smartest... baby bush probably one of our least intelligent. but i know people who knew him at harvard and they said obama was brilliant there. *shrug*
but we can play these games to justify the anti-intellectualism of the radical right i suppose.
Oh PULLEEEZE tell me you aren't another one of those stupid liberals who ended up believing their own side's deliberate smear campaigns! What a cow! If you think Bush was one of our least intelligent Presidents you have a MAJOR screw loose. Calling Republicans stupid is TYPICAL liberal bullshit that has been going on all my life. And they NEVER tire of doing it because other liberals want to believe it and look for any reason to insist their own candidate is SOO smart but the Republican is SOO stupid. I can remember them insisting Nixon was stupid when in fact he was anything BUT stupid. Dishonest yes -stupid NO. They called Reagan stupid when in fact he was extremely intelligent and not only one of the most successful California governors but one of the most successful US Presidents as well. They insisted George H.W. Bush was stupid. They insisted Dan Quayle was stupid. Here are the reasons they said these people were stupid:
1. Nixon perspired heavily during a debate under hot lights which must mean he wasn't sure of his facts and therefore stupid!
2. Reagan was an actor originally and that meant he was stupid and just "acting" the role of President . Only a liberal would believe that one's early career is a reliable indicator of intelligence. All while overlooking the fact he "acted" his way through being one of the most successful and popular California governors first and then repeated his success relying on those same core domestic and foreign policy positions. On the other hand -maybe even liberals realize how stupid the general bulk of Hollywood actors really are since the average level of education for them is just 11th grade. But they got it wrong with Reagan.
3. George H.W. Bush was stupid because he chose Quayle as his running mate and the fact Quayle got set up by a teacher who handed him the spelling list with the word "potato" misspelled proved how stupid Quayle was as well. Apparently liberals believe Quayle should have embarrassed her in front of her entire class by calling her out -so since he didn't it only proved how really stupid Quayle was as if HE had misspelled that word when in fact it was the teacher who had. Liberals want us all to believe that misspelling even one word is proof of stupidity.
4. George W. Bush was stupid because he not only didn't have the "cultured" east coast accent but spoke with a lot of malapropisms. It is LIBERALS who are really stupid if they believe a gift of public speaking is in ANY way correlated to intelligence because not only is there zero correlation, many of the most intelligent people in the world cannot speak publicly at all without tripping all over their words.
Liberals demand a gift of public speaking from their candidate -but I demand more than that in mine and in fact will overlook choppy public speaking skills entirely in exchange for FAR more substance. For those who think reading eloquently from a teleprompter equals proof of intelligence -I suggest that belief is evidence of their lack of intelligence.
If Democrats are going to insist the Republican is the stupid one, then they ought to make sure the candidate they put up to run against him isn't even less intelligent. George W. Bush received degrees from both Harvard and Yale and received his top grades in business and economics. He was NOT accepted to Harvard and Yale because of his father's name whatsoever because his father was nothing but an unknown junior Congressman at the time unknown anywhere outside of his state. Both Harvard and Yale can and DO refuse to take the children of politicians all the time and have kicked them out for poor grades. Bush never came close to being tossed for any reason but Kennedys have! Law schools do not teach business or economics but they do produce a lot of lawyers who know how to pretend they know everything anyway. Bush was one of the few Presidents in modern history with both a business education and business experience and actually knew what he was talking about when discussing business and economics. Lawyers are the ones FAKING IT. I'm sorry, I have no respect for lawyers and I'm not impressed by lawyers - and there are at least three in my family right now. None of them are the smartest people in the family and no one in my family is stupid enough to believe being a lawyer means they are smarter than everyone else either! We have more lawyers per capita than any other nation on earth -and THAT should tell you just how EASY it is to be one and not some rarefied occupation only bestowed upon our best and brightest! What a joke!
Gore flunked out of one college, dropped out of another during the first semester -before using his father's status as Senator to get into a college that wouldn't have taken him otherwise given his lousy track record in college. Kerry's top grade was in French and it was the only A he ever received in college. In FRENCH! Gee, even the lawyers in my family did better than that.
Unlike Clinton, George W. Bush knew it was impossible for anyone to be an expert in EVERY field and EVERY issue -which is why he surrounded himself with some of the best minds in the country in their particular fields as his advisers. Clinton used those very same appointed positions to reward political supporters, friends and allies and he believed HE knew more on ANY subject than anyone else. THAT is pretty darn stupid in my book. But in fact this same behavior is typical of our most intelligent Presidents -which is why some of the least successful Presidents were also among the most intelligent Presidents who believed their intelligence made them the top expert in everything - and the most successful were those of average intelligence who understood it was impossible to be an expert on everything and relied on those who were the top experts in their particular field. Intelligence without common sense is dangerous and some of our most intelligent Presidents on paper had the least common sense. Otherwise how do you explain Clinton degrading the Oval Office by using it as a whorehouse and committing felonies in order to try and get a lawsuit settled in his favor. Nixon was the same way -extremely intelligent but thought he was smart enough to be able to cover up a crime that he didn't commit at all but was committed without his prior knowledge on his behalf.
Very intelligent people are dangerous because they end up overestimating their own intelligence and underestimating the intelligence of everyone else. I prefer Presidents who actually have a good grasp and realistic understanding of their limitations and know where to find the best experts in their fields. And those just don't tend to be the smartest Presidents on paper.
Public speaking skills is NOT correlated at all to intelligence. Saying "noo-cluh-yer" instead of "noo-clear" is not correlated to intelligence. That pronunciation is accepted as a correct one by Webster's dictionary and pronounced that way in several mid-western states. Just not on the east coast where arrogant snobs believe their own pronunciation if the only acceptable one. Knowing how to spell "potato" is not correlated whatsoever to intelligence. One's early career is not correlated at all to intelligence. George W. Bush not only has above average intelligence, he is one of the most successful governors to have served in Texas with a strong reputation for producing bipartisan support for all sorts of important legislation passed during his two terms that are still in effect to this day -including legislation that resulted in turning Texas from a state with one of the highest drop out rates in high school - to one of the lowest drop out rates. Texas guarantees college acceptance and paid tuition at state colleges and universities for the top 10% of ALL high school classes in the state, rewarding rich and poor alike for working hard in school and has already raised the average level of eduction in the state. Thanks to stupid George Bush.
And finally YOU are stupid if you think those who make the Harvard Law Review are the top of the class! NOT TRUE. The Harvard Law Review is a student run organization intended to help members improve their writing and editing skills. The Review publishes articles from professors, judges, attorneys and certain authors discussing relevant issues.
Membership in the Harvard Law Review is limited to 2nd and 3rd year law students who are chosen based on their performance in an annual WRITING COMPETITION. They are NOT chosen based on their grades at all. The fact Obama was a member of the Harvard Law Review indicates NOTHING about his intelligence OR his performance in law school! Obama is NOT very intelligent at all but wants to believe his own hype and people like you want to pretend you just KNOW how intelligent he is because hey -listen to how eloquently he can read from a teleprompter! Because you have NOTHING else to even pretend suggests his level of intelligence here! (Even if he doesn't do so well speaking off the cuff like Clinton could who had a real gift for gab.)
I guarantee you that if Obama had outstanding grades at Harvard -he would have released them. Bush released his transcript and promptly too -his grades were nothing to be ashamed of from those prestigious schools. So the fact
Obama refuses to release his transcript tells me his grades don't stack up well at all against the man people like you and he insisted was SOOO stupid. If they were good grades that could be used as "proof" about how stupid Bush was at Harvard -believe me, those grades would have been made public instead of being hidden to this day.