Jarhead
Gold Member
- Jan 11, 2010
- 20,670
- 2,378
- 245
it was not a chokehold. If it were, the cop would have been cited for it. It was not a choke hold. End of conversation.Liar.The medical examiner revised his opinion saying there was no chokehold.It. is. not. illegal.1. No it isn't. It's against NYPD policy. It is not illegal.Wow, so many lies.
1. The chokehold is an ILLEGAL procedure in the NYPD. That's a fact your precious Fox News won't tell you.
2. He was doing nothing wrong but standing there. All they could have done was leave him alone and he would be alive today. But no, for a petty misdemeanor they decided "Take him down by chokehold." that's totally appropriate.
3. And that's the problem that you fail to realize. The excessive force against a person who isn't doing anything violent.
But it's doesn't matter to you. The ends justify the means. Who cares that a person's life was lost, how dare you question the infallible police officer! They are gods that shall never be questioned.
You right winger bitch about the "police state", yet black people are experiencing that as we speak but you don't care.
Why do you advocate for the murder of all black female police officers?
Hence an illegal NYPD procedure. And I never said I advocated for murder of black female officers or any officers but nice straw man
It is against policy, meaning he can be punished or fired from the NYPD for using it, but he can't be prosecuted for a crime.
It's a moot point, anyway. The grand jury decided he did not use a chokehold.