NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building' in Minutes

[the watcher]

NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building' in Minutes​

​

ICE agents have set up shop at NYC immigration court and have been clearing it out on a daily basis. Activists are appalled, calling these deportation arrests illegal and immoral, however proponents say ICE remains within their legal authority to deport people who do not have permission to live in America... especially after due process has concluded. Journalistic report, includes news footage, commentary and analysis.
Commentary:
Imagine that! A court of law actually being used to enforce the law and punish criminals. It’s unheard of!!
Whatever happened to those NGO's that helped facilitate these fraudulent asylum claims. Why aren't they punished
People, that lied about or left out information on their naturalization papers, should have their naturalization of citizenship stripped.
It’s the person’s responsibility to ensure they are incompliance with their stay under visa laws..
However, they have used ICE to overstay their vacation and get a free flight home, so they only have to pay for a one way ticket to their vacation destination should they ever come and visit the States.
Meanwhile, DSAM Democrats say it’s illegal to enforce the law.

The danger here is that enforcing existing laws could negatively impact our dive into anarchy and communism. We must be careful. Liberals Warn Enforcing Immigration Law Is A Slippery Slope That May Lead To Enforcing Other Laws

 

[jackflash]

I was a member back in the 70's, before all the social darwinists with the pocket protectors who worked at General Dynamics, ironically, took over and ruined all the cookouts and made loony screeds at every meeting. I did vote for Ed Clark and Andre Marou for Prez later on, though.

Yeah, some Repubs revolted after that realignment election back in the latter 60's. The Original Lp USA was a winner but the RINO's & statist left infiltrated the Lp in depth & turned the Lp into a funny farm. Below; the RNC illegally blocks Ron Paul's delegates in his 3rd attempt o become the RNC's POTUS candidate.

 

[the watcher]

I was with our Libertarian Party USA from 1983 through 2014 as a Contributing Member. Back then the Lp was a constitutionally based political party but the statist lefties heavily infiltrated our ranks. After 31 years with our Lp USA I had to pull out as they were going totally bananas. The links below well illustrate what happens to a well intentioned movement/party when the statist left infiltrates an organization.

How a New Hampshire libertarian utopia was foiled by bears

Seriously, this happened. You should absolutely read about it.

www.vox.com

The Town That Went Feral

When a group of libertarians set about scrapping their local government, chaos descended. And then the bears moved in.

newrepublic.com

You have to realize what the uniparty does to independent candidates too, like Ross Perot, to maintain their iron fist. If an elected official even tries to show some uppity independence they go into full media jacket mode, like with Carter and Kennedy. The same would hold true with any 3rd party or a Constitutional Convention; it would be infiltrated and compromised even if it were to happen. The federal electoral commission promotes this tyranny with matching funds. There is no Calvery coming to save anyone.

 

[Lisa558]

If they have an immigration hearing they have legal status.

They had their hearing, and their fake asylum claim was denied. Out they go.

 

[pknopp]

You say it’s fake. Do you have any evidence for that claim?

How about you post a news story about it? Besides that, it's incredible obvious unless you are incredibly gullible.

 

[Crepitus]

Only if they are granted legal status. The vast majority of the faux asylum seekers don’t qualify and knew it before they crossed the border. They were instructed by the NGOs and Coyotes to claim asylum to get access to the interior of the USA.

If they were allowed to remain in the country for a court date they have at least temporary status to be here.

 

[BackAgain]

You say it’s fake. Do you have any evidence for that claim?

Pknopp’s laughing smileycon in reply means that “no” he has no support for his claim.

How completely expected.

 

[Picaro]

Pknopp’s laughing smileycon in reply means that “no” he has no support for his claim.

How completely expected.

It's silly answering their little demands anyway; they either never read them and just change the subject to some TDS rant or other, or they just post more fake news as a response.

Never take orders from halfwits. All the news is out there, they just don't want to find it for themselves, is all.

 

[BackAgain]

How about you post a news story about it? Besides that, it's incredible obvious unless you are incredibly gullible.

Ah. You are declaring your speculation as a fact. As expected.

It's silly answering their little demands anyway; they either never read them and just change the subject to some TDS rant or other, or they just post more fake news as a response.

Never take orders from halfwits. All the news is out there, they just don't want to find it for themselves, is all.

i sometimes stumble across a liberal who — mistakes notwithstanding — does try to answer the question with some actual support.

Here, we have one deciding to duck, bob, weave and evade, instead. Completely expected from him and most of them.

 

[pknopp]

Ah. You are declaring your speculation as a fact. As expected.

I'm declaring my fact as a fact.

 

[BackAgain]

I'm declaring my fact as a fact.

You declared you **** waffle babbling as fact. As always.

 

[pknopp]

You declared you **** waffle babbling as fact. As always.

This would be headline news. Odd no one can come up with a news link. All you are doing is showing how easy you are led.

 

[BackAgain]

This would be headline news. Odd no one can come up with a news link. All you are doing is showing how easy you are led.

Assuming (incorrectly) that no one can come up with a news link, doesn’t support your contention.

Sorry. Your facile “logic” is perpetually unpersuasive.

 

[pknopp]

Assuming (incorrectly) that no one can come up with a news link, doesn’t support your contention.

Sorry. Your facile “logic” is perpetually unpersuasive.

And yet it does. I'd be embarrassed if I was as gullible as you also.

 

[BackAgain]

And yet it does. I'd be embarrassed if I was as gullible as you also.

Yes. Your facile logic is always unpersuasive. We agree on something. You should be embarrassed. But I doubt you are. Alas.

 

[Delldude]

If they have an immigration hearing they have legal status.

Hal says BooSheet,

AI Overview

No, having an immigration hearing does not automatically grant legal status. An immigration hearing is a legal proceeding where an immigration judge will decide whether an individual is eligible to remain in the United States or should be deported. It's a step in the process, not a guarantee of legal status.

 

[pknopp]

Hal says BooSheet,

AI Overview

No, having an immigration hearing does not automatically grant legal status. An immigration hearing is a legal proceeding where an immigration judge will decide whether an individual is eligible to remain in the United States or should be deported. It's a step in the process, not a guarantee of legal status.

You posted nothing to counter what was said.

 

[San Souci]

If they have an immigration hearing they have legal status.

No. They are dirty 3rd world scum. They will never assimilate. Just bring us down to their scum level.

 

[Eman623]

If they were allowed to remain in the country for a court date they have at least temporary status to be here.

Or in a safe harbor country. If they are from say Honduras and entered the US from Mexico, they can wait in Mexico for their court date.

 

[pknopp]

Or in a safe harbor country. If they are from say Honduras and entered the US from Mexico, they can wait in Mexico for their court date.

They can but they don't have to.