The societal costs of Alcohol are incalculable.
Drunk driving, most use it as a tool b/c they are not able to be honest in their social interactions, and thus, their relationships are not honest.
Sure, alcohol has consequences, or can. But that's got nothing to do with my point, which is, again, the drinker, in the moment of drinking, inebriates only himself --- while the smoker, in the moment of smoking,
directly involves everybody breathing the same air. Whatever the effects of either one AFTER that point, has zero to do with the fact that only the latter is
involving others without their consent.
Nicotine on the other hand, it is a stimulant, not a depressant. . . it might have foul odor, but it is much better for your intellect. I was talking to my doctor once, and he told me that he knew A LOT of surgeons that smoke cigars. It is common knowlege that CEO's, bankers and traders do as well.
We're going with Appeal to Authority here to make an irrelevant point? With a dash of "Everybody Knows"?
Still irrelevant. As they used to say in my grammar school, 'if everybody jumped in the lake would you jump in too'? Sorry, the "four out of five doctors" a/k/a "best selling" etc line has never impressed me, even if it had been on the point.
Most folks that turn to alcohol are self-medicating for slight mental problems they need some form of relief from after suffering from all day/week. Whether it is mild chronic anxiety, depression, social awkwardness, OCD. . the list is endless that alcohol treats.
Possibly, wouldn't know. I don't use it myself but it sounds plausible. But this is on the topic of motivating factors, also irrelevant here.
The fact that you believe one drug is better than the other shows a very closed mind.
Actually I made no value judgments on either. I simply drew the distinction that one involves bystanders involuntarily, while the other does not.