S
Nuts!
- Thread starter WillowTree
- Start date
Modbert
Daydream Believer
- Sep 2, 2008
- 33,178
- 3,055
- 48
Part of your "evidence" comes from "fluffer union" - a blog? Fluffer Union??
Where I got the evidence from is all factual. Unless you can dispute criminal convictions and admitting by the people themselves.
Modbert
Daydream Believer
- Sep 2, 2008
- 33,178
- 3,055
- 48
You post blogs that spew BS. I post blogs that show the amount of criminal convictions on Republicans. And their amount of hypocrisy.
BIG difference.
Modbert
Daydream Believer
- Sep 2, 2008
- 33,178
- 3,055
- 48
Established and respected sources? Fox News is not a respected source.
Tell me how any of my sources are WRONG though?
You call them garbage, show me how MichelleAnn.
Umm, you posted an article from Newsmax. You don't get to bitch about other peoples sources after that.
AllieBaba
Rookie
- Oct 2, 2007
- 33,778
- 3,927
- 0
- Banned
- #28
Fox news is the #1 news source in the world, dear.
And WSJ is highly respected.
But here are the problems with your sources.
#1. They don't confirm what you say. If you say "Republicans commit more voter fraud than democrats and get caught at it more often" then your source had better have some hard evidence. To say Republicans commit more voter fraud then provide blogs where a bunch of times Republicans have been ACCUSED of voter fraud but not convicted is not supporting your own statement.
#2. They're shit sources. All they consist of are people, such as you and me, commenting on information they have gleaned from OTHER sources. They do not name the sources or provide links. You're just taking the word of these jackasses on what they've heard elsewhere.
Any good journalist knows that every story must have at least 3 sources, each named, and that for each allegation made against a person, the journalist has made a good faith effort to obtain a response from the other side.
For example, in my oft-linked WSJ story, the story is about Acorn's hideous track record...but it also quotes Acorn sources. The effective ones are the ones where they're PLEADING GUILTY TO VOTER FRAUD, but there are others.
There. That's my lesson for the day.
And WSJ is highly respected.
But here are the problems with your sources.
#1. They don't confirm what you say. If you say "Republicans commit more voter fraud than democrats and get caught at it more often" then your source had better have some hard evidence. To say Republicans commit more voter fraud then provide blogs where a bunch of times Republicans have been ACCUSED of voter fraud but not convicted is not supporting your own statement.
#2. They're shit sources. All they consist of are people, such as you and me, commenting on information they have gleaned from OTHER sources. They do not name the sources or provide links. You're just taking the word of these jackasses on what they've heard elsewhere.
Any good journalist knows that every story must have at least 3 sources, each named, and that for each allegation made against a person, the journalist has made a good faith effort to obtain a response from the other side.
For example, in my oft-linked WSJ story, the story is about Acorn's hideous track record...but it also quotes Acorn sources. The effective ones are the ones where they're PLEADING GUILTY TO VOTER FRAUD, but there are others.
There. That's my lesson for the day.
WillowTree
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2008
- 84,532
- 16,102
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #30
WillowTree
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2008
- 84,532
- 16,102
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #31
yes it is. It's the only place you get fair and balanced. I bet you think MSNBC is fair and balanced.
Modbert
Daydream Believer
- Sep 2, 2008
- 33,178
- 3,055
- 48
yes it is. It's the only place you get fair and balanced. I bet you think MSNBC is fair and balanced.
MSNBC I don't believe is exactly fair and balanced either.
However, I'm loving the fact that Republicans are not only defending these criminals but are saying I'm wrong because of my sources.
I didn't know these convictions were a myth, I suppose it's a just big Liberal lie huh?
Modbert
Daydream Believer
- Sep 2, 2008
- 33,178
- 3,055
- 48
Btw, in this link: Republican values create child molesters
Feel free to click on the names, they send you to all the lovely news sources you want MichelleAnn.
So much for biased news sources, all it is a collection of news sources put into one easy website to point out the hypocrisy of Republicans.
Feel free to click on the names, they send you to all the lovely news sources you want MichelleAnn.
So much for biased news sources, all it is a collection of news sources put into one easy website to point out the hypocrisy of Republicans.
AllieBaba
Rookie
- Oct 2, 2007
- 33,778
- 3,927
- 0
- Banned
- #35
I can find just as many greasy sources to affirm whatever nutty assertion I cared to make. I could find a million links to prove any bigoted ridiculous claptrap I wanted to assert. I could claim that redheads have lower i.q.s and find proof of it.
Modbert
Daydream Believer
- Sep 2, 2008
- 33,178
- 3,055
- 48
I guess them going to actual jail for it is not proof enough for you? Or being in court records that they got sentenced to such and such a crime? Or being arrested for such a crime?
Is that not enough proof for you MichelleAnn?
WhiteLion
WMS.
Throw it right back in their faces...
Power Line Forum | Federal Suit: Obama Not A ?Natural Born Citizen,? Obama & DNC Try To Delay Production of Obama?s Birth Certificate ’Till After Election
The Corner on National Review Online
O'S DANGEROUS PALS - New York Post
Newsmax.com – Obama Wants NRA Ads Banned
Newsmax.com – U.S., Breaking News, Politics, Conservative, News, President, Election
Manning's Fierce Prayer for Bristol Palin | Veoh Video Network
Modbert
Daydream Believer
- Sep 2, 2008
- 33,178
- 3,055
- 48
Aww looks like I seemed to upset the poor little extremist.It's okay, I'm sure you'd let your kids hang out with any of these guys right?
Republican values create child molesters
Modbert
Daydream Believer
- Sep 2, 2008
- 33,178
- 3,055
- 48
Not oddly attached, just one of the best ones to use since it has oh so many sources but even then you deny their being valid.
Because you know, Republicans being sentenced to jail is just a myth made up the Liberal media right?
How about you MichelleAnn? Would you let your kids spend a afternoon being babysitted by one of these guys?
Similar threads
