NRA readies lawsuit against tyrannical California ammunition law

We're about to see how NRA > California.

Beautiful! I can hear the wailing and gnashing of teefs already.
 
California's ammunition controls will do nothing to stop criminals from killing people. Criminals seldom buy any ammunition in the first place: They don't practice, and they use whatever shit ammo came with the gun they stole, borrowed, or bought illegally. In addition to that, if firearms are supposed to be so hard for criminals to obtain, ammunition is much easier to get a hold of.

If California keeps up with their retarded shit, they'll soon rival Chicago in gun murders.
 
AMENDMENT II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

if the gooberment outlaws my ammo then they are infringing on my right to bear arms...a weapon is only "armed" when loaded...without bullets its a fireplace mantle chotskie....
 
Of course Brainless357 thinks the constitution is funny....
 
AMENDMENT II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

if the gooberment outlaws my ammo then they are infringing on my right to bear arms...a weapon is only "armed" when loaded...without bullets its a fireplace mantle chotskie....
Well regulated means ammo.
Just about any gun law is unconstitutional. Idc what the activist SC says. The constitution is clear.
 
AMENDMENT II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

if the gooberment outlaws my ammo then they are infringing on my right to bear arms...a weapon is only "armed" when loaded...without bullets its a fireplace mantle chotskie....
Well regulated means ammo.
Just about any gun law is unconstitutional. Idc what the activist SC says. The constitution is clear.
No. That’s not what it means.
 
AMENDMENT II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

if the gooberment outlaws my ammo then they are infringing on my right to bear arms...a weapon is only "armed" when loaded...without bullets its a fireplace mantle chotskie....
Well regulated means ammo.
Just about any gun law is unconstitutional. Idc what the activist SC says. The constitution is clear.
No. That’s not what it means.
Damn right it does. It means arms are to be working efficiently and all means to use them are readily available.
Try reading history dingbat.
 
15th post
Dem's can't muster the votes to amend the Constitution lawfully so they plot and scheme ways around the constitution. They are truly the scum of the earth.
 
Second Amendment says nothing about bullets

Register all bullets
 
“They bar out-of-state ammunition purchases and require that all in-state purchases be made from a licensed dealer. This shrinks the supply, which will inevitably drive up price. Moreover, they require that any ammunition purchased online be sent to a licensed in-state dealer, who will then charge a processing fee for the ammo, thereby driving the price up even further.“


How could anyone object?
 
Dem's can't muster the votes to amend the Constitution lawfully so they plot and scheme ways around the constitution. They are truly the scum of the earth.

Talking about scum of the earth:



Beto Calls for Financial Industry to Boycott Gun Industry
Says 'credit cards have enabled' mass shootings

O'Rourke did not define "assault weapons," but the varying definitions between the handful of states that have implemented bans are broad enough that most gun companies likely produce at least one firearm that the former Texas representative would consider an "assault weapon." This means O'Rourke is calling on the financial industry to effectively boycott the entire gun industry as it exists now.

"If enough of us make our voices heard now, we will force banks and credit card companies to act," he further tweeted.

Remember when Democrats were still pretending not to be gun-grabbers, just the supporters of sensible gun control? LOL! You lunatics are actually willing to start a civil war.

 
Back
Top Bottom