Now that New York City failed to learn from Bud Light's mistakes

They found much fraud. Thus the huge disgorgement.

Do.you think NY shouldn't go after fraudsters?
The banks that gave him the loans said he didn't commit fraud against them. It was a joke. If you paid half attention and with a open mind you would see that. Hey they got Trump who cares how many laws they broke or streched to do it.
 
The banks that gave him the loans said he didn't commit fraud against them. It was a joke. If you paid half attention and with a open mind you would see that. Hey they got Trump who cares how many laws they broke or streched to do it.
I know that one or two did so I have been paying attention.

It's also irrelevant. He committed fraud.
 
I know that one or two did so I have been paying attention.

It's also irrelevant. He committed fraud.
How? There were no victims.
I was going to do a refinance on my home. I was asked the value of my home I spit out an educated guess based on sells in my area. The bank asked be to get an independent appraisal. The appraisal came in 20,000 less than what i told the bank, because of an easement for power lines on my property. Did i commit fraud by telling the bank my property was worth 20,000 more? According to NY and you I did.
 
How? There were no victims.

Victims are not required.

I was going to do a refinance on my home. I was asked the value of my home I spit out an educated guess based on sells in my area. The bank asked be to get an independent appraisal. The appraisal came in 20,000 less than what i told the bank, because of an easement for power lines on my property. Did i commit fraud by telling the bank my property was worth 20,000 more? According to NY and you I did.
Not sure. Trump committed fraud though.

Thus the disgorgement.
 
The endless list of things the right wing nuts claim they are boycotting. First, almost none of them actually have money to spend anyway so there is zero effect on Disney, Target, Barbie, Amazon, American Airlines, Ben and Jerries, Bud Light, Cracker Barrel, Hallmark Channel, M&Ms, NASCAR, NFL, NBA, MLB, Nike, Starbucks… the list just goes on and on and on and on.

You are all fucking snowflakes.
 
How? There were no victims.
I was going to do a refinance on my home. I was asked the value of my home I spit out an educated guess based on sells in my area. The bank asked be to get an independent appraisal. The appraisal came in 20,000 less than what i told the bank, because of an easement for power lines on my property. Did i commit fraud by telling the bank my property was worth 20,000 more? According to NY and you I did.
Commercial real estate, like any other business in a capitalist country, is competitive.

The victims are DJ's competitors that couldn't, or wouldn't, lie and cheat their way into enough money to compete with the fraudster.
 
Only a Trumper would boycott a city or a state because Trump was found liable for civil fraud.

Only a Trumper would also believe that there are enough people that give a damn about Trump to affect investment in or tourism to NYC or NYS.

Poor Babies. So lost…
All the Liberal ass wipes are boycotting GFM because they are accepting donations for President Trump. Only a cry baby Liberal believes in a boycott. See how that works?
 
Oh? Tell us more oh legal scholar….”not sure”…hurumph!

Here is a great argument from a reasonable source…

Hmmm...an opinion piece.

I guess I stand corrected. The defense, the prosecutors, the judges and the entirety of both sides legal scholars missed the victim requirement.

Trump's only hope now is whoever rules on the appeal is familiar with the victim requirement and that person rules appropriately.

Hopefully between now and then Trump's legal team orchestrates that defense moving forward...but one must wonder why it wasn't brought up in the courtroom previously.

Good job.
 
I am sorry you take it for a political party, I have none because they are lame ass operations that can't be trusted but you kneel and bob all yous likes.
says the commie shill that disparages republicans constantly but rarely if ever disparages democrats .
 
You being one I thought you'd know.
1708828411066.png
 
You really have to wonder about these Democrats. They lead by emotion and wow, it costs them billions and billions. Even if Trump were to Pay NY the googles of cash they've fined him for, that money doesn't begin to put a dent in the losses of that city and State, all because they were led by their non-binary johnsons.

And no amount of money can make these people sane. Would you want to live or do business there?
Seems that it's republicans who lead by emotions. Bud Weiser continues making huge money. And NYC won't be losing money because Trump was held accountable for his crimes.
 
The banks that gave him the loans said he didn't commit fraud against them. It was a joke. If you paid half attention and with a open mind you would see that. Hey they got Trump who cares how many laws they broke or streched to do it.
welcome B....you'll soon figger out half this boards intelligence equals 1 functioning retard
 
Seems that it's republicans who lead by emotions. Bud Weiser continues making huge money. And NYC won't be losing money because Trump was held accountable for his crimes.
^^^^...see what i mean B??....functioning retard....barely
 
Your emotions lead you to decide not to do business because Trump was held accountable for fraud.
you know how many businesses will leave over this smooth brain???....how many won't start up????............lolol
 
Commercial real estate, like any other business in a capitalist country, is competitive.

The victims are DJ's competitors that couldn't, or wouldn't, lie and cheat their way into enough money to compete with the fraudster.
The banks did there own appraisal of Trumps properties. It is the norm of loans when net properties are used as collateral. Once the banks determined the value of said property and both parties agreed on the terms of the loan then and only then was the loan issed. The banks that issued the loan said they were never swindled by Trump and would be glad to do business with him again. This was a joke. We know it. Keep turning a blind eye to the completed weaponization of our sytems and see want happens. If we the people keep allowing this to happen. We will be just like Cuba in less than 10 years. One party to rule them all.
 
Hmmm...an opinion piece.

I guess I stand corrected. The defense, the prosecutors, the judges and the entirety of both sides legal scholars missed the victim requirement.

Trump's only hope now is whoever rules on the appeal is familiar with the victim requirement and that person rules appropriately.

Hopefully between now and then Trump's legal team orchestrates that defense moving forward...but one must wonder why it wasn't brought up in the courtroom previously.

Good job.
I understand you don't like opinions that disagree with the RR job going on in front of our face...But, just to be clear, an 'ad-hom' is an immediate loss of the argument in debate. And you opened your post with it....So, I accept your surrender.
 
The endless list of things the right wing nuts claim they are boycotting. First, almost none of them actually have money to spend anyway so there is zero effect on Disney, Target, Barbie, Amazon, American Airlines, Ben and Jerries, Bud Light, Cracker Barrel, Hallmark Channel, M&Ms, NASCAR, NFL, NBA, MLB, Nike, Starbucks… the list just goes on and on and on and on.

You are all fucking snowflakes.
As less money goes into the inner-city neighborhoods, I am sure they will not be snowflakes. They are impassioned and strong Progressive Socialist voters as we all know. I just do not understand why they are crying about the illegals though. It just does not make sense. Progs are virtuous and above any self needs for themselves over others. As less money is available it will affect all groups within the Prog Party.
 
I understand you don't like opinions that disagree

Whether I like their opinion or not is irrelevant.

with the RR job going on in front of our face...

Are you not shocked that the judge, lawyers and legal teams from both sides didn't make this arguement in court?

Why only in public? Why would this compelling legal arguement not be made in court?

But, just to be clear, an 'ad-hom' is an immediate loss of the argument in debate. And you opened your post with it....So, I accept your surrender.
I don't blame you for declaring victory and running. Your arguement makes no logical sense and seems predicated on your own personal hubris concerning legal expertise.
 

Forum List

Back
Top