Nothing says family values like Florida MAGA GOP leaders

[Edgetho]

According to the religious right it is unless married to whomever your partner is!

They're wrong. Dead wrong.

Half the characters in the Bible believed in and practiced plural marriage. Mormons do.

If this is the best some dimocrap scumbag can come up with re; hypocritical Christians, it's pretty sad.

Which describes dimocraps pretty well.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Morality is still good even if that couple does not practice it

I agree but to each their own, just so they do not effect others negatively.
But to do something, most, find immoral and then being an extremely loud voice for others to be moral is beyond the pale.

 

[Mac-7]

Woke has nothing to do with it. Are you calling that married couple woke now?

No, they are all messed up as much as a junky hooked on heroin

But they can still save themselves if they truly repent

 

[Aldo Raine]

They're wrong. Dead wrong.

Half the characters in the Bible believed in and practiced plural marriage. Mormons do.

If this is the best some dimocrap scumbag can come up with re; hypocritical Christians, it's pretty sad.

Which describes dimocraps pretty well.

No pointing out the amoral and hypocritical right is all!

 

[Mac-7]

I agree but to each their own, just so they do not effect others negatively.

They have affected others in a negative way

 

[ElmerMudd]

No, they are all messed up as much as a junky hooked on heroin

But they can still save themselves if they truly repent

They need to save themselves instead of spending so much time trying to save others. HYPOCRITES.

 

[Edgetho]

No pointing out the amoral and hypocritical right is all!

There's nothing in the Bible about it, moron.

You're just pulling it out of your ass.

As usual.

Fortunately, nobody can tell the difference.

 

[Mac-7]

Good, so is that couple woke? They certainly didn't act or speak like that before getting caught. In fact the opposite. I noticed you failed to answer that part!

They hid their addiction just as some druggies can maintain for years before being exposed

 

[Aldo Raine]

No, they are all messed up as much as a junky hooked on heroin

But they can still save themselves if they truly repent

Agreed.
Would you call them amoral then?
Because this doesn't sound as though it was a 1 time thing.

 

[Mac-7]

They need to save themselves instead of spending so much time trying to save others. HYPOCRITES.

I think they have probably lost any positive influence they once had

Its a clear victory for libs

 

[Aldo Raine]

There's nothing in the Bible about it, moron.

You're just pulling it out of your ass.

As usual.

Fortunately, nobody can tell the difference.

Except it is the reprehensible right that keeps calling these kinds of things amoral while clutching tightly to their Bible.

 

[Mac-7]

Agreed.
Would you call them amoral then?
Because this doesn't sound as though it was a 1 time thing.

I dont know them well enough to say more than what little we know

This is a victory for Satan

 

[Edgetho]

No pointing out the amoral and hypocritical right is all!

I am Christian and I have nothing against a plural lifestyle. None of my, or your, goddamn business.

A woman, a younger woman, has a medical issue, a serious medical issue that won't allow her to have sex any more.

What's her husband to do if he's still a young, strong, vital Man (which you wouldn't understand anyway)?

Should he desert her and say, "Even though I will love you till my dying day, I won't break some bullshit, made-up rule, so I have to leave you to fend for yourself. Good luck."

Sex is for the people involved in it. Nobody else.

The old-time Bible didn't want people screwing everything that moved for practical reasons -- STD's. They didn't have penicillin in those days. In fact, most of the Old Testament is just telling people how to live. Don't murder your neighbor, don't screw his Ol' Lady, don't eat pork (trichinosis, doncha know)

There were many plural marriages because Men often died much sooner than women. Especially during times of War.

The biggest problem with dims is -- You just don't think. You're incapable of it. Without the DISGUSTING FILTH in the LSM, without your Masters telling you what to think and do, you're lost.

Try thinking for yourselves every now and then. It's contagious

 

[ElmerMudd]

They're wrong. Dead wrong.

Half the characters in the Bible believed in and practiced plural marriage. Mormons do.

If this is the best some dimocrap scumbag can come up with re; hypocritical Christians, it's pretty sad.

Which describes dimocraps pretty well.

Edgetho, who are you to say they are dead wrong. They may be right, they may be wrong. Those who think they know for sure what God wants and defines it to others, is playing God. You are not God.

 

[Aldo Raine]

I am Christian and I have nothing against a plural lifestyle. None of my, or your, goddamn business.

A woman, a younger woman, has a medical issue, a serious medical issue that won't allow her to have sex any more.

What's her husband to do if he's still a young, strong, vital Man (which you wouldn't understand anyway)?

Should he desert her and say, "Even though I will love you till my dying day, I won't break some bullshit, made-up rule, so I have to leave you to fend for yourself. Good luck."

Sex is for the people involved in it. Nobody else.

The old-time Bible didn't want people screwing everything that moved for practical reasons -- STD's. They didn't have penicillin in those days. In fact, most of the Old Testament is just telling people how to live. Don't murder your neighbor, don't screw his Ol' Lady, don't eat pork (trichinosis, doncha know)

There were many plural marriages because Men often died much sooner than women. Especially during times of War.

The biggest problem with dims is -- You just don't think. You're incapable of it. Without the DISGUSTING FILTH in the LSM, without your Masters telling you what to think and do, you're lost.

Try thinking for yourselves every now and then. It's contagious

I am using the reprehensible rights words not mine or yours. Do those Bible thumping freaks NOT say that extramarital sex is immoral? Of course they do and you know they do!

 

[Edgetho]

Except it is the reprehensible right that keeps calling these kinds of things amoral while clutching tightly to their Bible.

Like who(m)? TV Evangelists? Those clowns are one step removed from campaigning for a southern dimocrap.

What people do in the privacy of their own home is nobody's business. It is very telling that the side which keeps telling us that are the ones condemning what is done in the privacy of a person's home.

Now let's talk about hypocrisy.. Waddya say?

 

[Edgetho]

Edgetho, who are you to say they are dead wrong. They may be right, they may be wrong. Those who think they know for sure what God wants and defines it to others, is playing God. You are not God.

That's what you think

 

[ElmerMudd]

Are you suggesting that conservatives should throw in the towel and join the libs by supporting child porn?

I think everybody should focus on cleaning up their own house before they spend time telling others how they should clean up their house.
People do that from all political persuasions but MAGA minions are the worst.

 

[Edgetho]

I am using the reprehensible rights words not mine or yours. Do those Bible thumping freaks NOT say that extramarital sex is immoral? Of course they do and you know they do!

What constitutes a marriage? A Church? A State? Two or more people?

go away, you bother the adults

 

[Aldo Raine]

Like who(m)? TV Evangelists? Those clowns are one step removed from campaigning for a southern dimocrap.

What people do in the privacy of their own home is nobody's business. It is very telling that the side which keeps telling us that are the ones condemning what is done in the privacy of a person's home.

Now let's talk about hypocrisy.. Waddya say?

No, they support only the reprehensible right and most are 100% in love with your blob! Some even saying he was sent by god!